IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v102y2022i3d10.1007_s10273-022-3139-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impfpflichten, Anreize und die effiziente Nutzung von Coronaimpfstoffen
[Vaccine Mandates, Private Incentives and the Efficient Use of Coronavirus Vaccines]

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Stolpe

    (Kiel Institut für Weltwirtschaft)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Impfpflichten sind aus ökonomischer Sicht ein negativer Anreiz, sich impfen zu lassen. Im Einzelfall genauso wirksame positive Anreize — etwa staatlich finanzierte Impfprämien — können flexibler gestaltet werden, einige Nachteile starrer gesetzlicher Impfpflichten vermeiden und womöglich eine höhere Impfquote erreichen helfen. Zuverlässige Antikörpertests können helfen, die Subventionierung auf Menschen ohne ausreichenden Immunschutz zu begrenzen. Wegen des hohen volkswirtschaftlichen Werts einer höheren Impfquote im Kampf gegen SARS-CoV-2 hat Deutschland einen großen ungenutzten Finanzierungsspielraum für Impfprämien. Denkbar sind auch Kombinationen von Impfprämien und -pflichten.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Stolpe, 2022. "Impfpflichten, Anreize und die effiziente Nutzung von Coronaimpfstoffen [Vaccine Mandates, Private Incentives and the Efficient Use of Coronavirus Vaccines]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(3), pages 224-228, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:102:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10273-022-3139-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-022-3139-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-022-3139-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-022-3139-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gandjour, Afschin, 2022. "Value-based pricing of a COVID-19 vaccine," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Katrin Schmelz & Samuel Bowles, 2021. "Overcoming COVID-19 vaccination resistance when alternative policies affect the dynamics of conformism, social norms, and crowding out," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(25), pages 2104912118-, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Colautti & Alice Cancer & Sara Magenes & Alessandro Antonietti & Paola Iannello, 2022. "Risk-Perception Change Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine’s Side Effects: The Role of Individual Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Louise Rawlings & Jeffrey C. L. Looi & Stephen J. Robson, 2022. "Economic Considerations in COVID‐19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal: A Survey of the Literature," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 98(321), pages 214-229, June.
    3. Bartscher, Alina Kristin & Seitz, Sebastian & Siegloch, Sebastian & Slotwinski, Michaela & Wehrhöfer, Nils, 2021. "Social capital and the spread of covid-19: Insights from european countries," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Keser, Claudia & Rau, Holger A., 2022. "Policy incentives and determinants of citizens' COVID-19 vaccination motives," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 434, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    5. Reddinger, J. Lucas & Charness, Gary & Levine, David, 2022. "Prosocial motivation for vaccination," SocArXiv emj6v, Center for Open Science.
    6. Yihan Zhao & Rong Chen & Mitsuyasu Yabe & Buxin Han & Pingping Liu, 2021. "I Am Better Than Others: Waste Management Policies and Self-Enhancement Bias," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Fadwa El Guindi, 2022. "Turning the world on its head: The virus that disrupted “business as usual”," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 149-154, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    I12; I18;

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:102:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10273-022-3139-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.