IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v102y2022i10d10.1007_s10273-022-3288-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optionen und Herausforderungen für ein neues Strommarktdesign in der Krise
[Options and Challenges for a New Electricity Market Design in the Crisis]

Author

Listed:
  • Axel Ockenfels

    (Universität zu Köln)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Die Politik scheint entschlossen, in die Gestaltung des Stromgroßhandelsmarktes einzugreifen, um Krisengewinne und -belastungen umzuverteilen. Einige Vorschläge in diese Richtung würden die Probleme jedoch verschärfen. Es werden Handlungsoptionen für ein neues Strommarktdesign aufgezeigt und die damit verbundenen Herausforderungen bei der Implementierung diskutiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Axel Ockenfels, 2022. "Optionen und Herausforderungen für ein neues Strommarktdesign in der Krise [Options and Challenges for a New Electricity Market Design in the Crisis]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(10), pages 766-769, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:102:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s10273-022-3288-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-022-3288-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-022-3288-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-022-3288-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg Zachmann, . "Electricity without borders- a plan to make the internal market work," Blueprints, Bruegel, number 791, December.
    2. Paul L. Joskow, 2001. "California's Electricity Crisis," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 365-388.
    3. Peter Cramton, 2022. "Fostering Resiliency with Good Market Design: Lessons from Texas," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 145, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    4. Ockenfels Axel, 2021. "Marktdesign für eine resiliente Impfstoff-produktion," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 22(3), pages 259-269, September.
    5. Peter Cramton & Axel Ockenfels & Alvin E. Roth & Robert B. Wilson, 2020. "Borrow crisis tactics to get COVID-19 supplies to where they are needed," Nature, Nature, vol. 582(7812), pages 334-336, June.
    6. Peter Cramton, 2017. "Electricity market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 589-612.
    7. repec:bre:polbrf:node_7985 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:bre:polcon:49082 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Grégory Claeys & Gustav Fredriksson & Georg Zachmann, . "The distributional effects of climate policies," Blueprints, Bruegel, number 28291, December.
    10. Peter Cramton & Axel Ockenfels & Steven Stoft, 2013. "Capacity Market Fundamentals," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Axel Ockenfels, 2022. "Marktdesign für die Gasmangellage," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 040, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    2. Axel Ockenfels, 2022. "Marktdesign für die Gasmangellage [Market Design for a Gas Shortage]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(11), pages 855-857, November.
    3. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Peter Cramton, 2022. "Fostering Resiliency with Good Market Design: Lessons from Texas," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 145, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    5. Mier, Mathias, 2021. "Efficient pricing of electricity revisited," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Vitali Gretschko & Axel Ockenfels, 2023. "Empfehlungen für das Marktdesign zur Befüllung der Gasspeicher," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 046, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    7. Fabra, Natalia & Motta, Massimo & Peitz, Martin, 2022. "Learning from electricity markets: How to design a resilience strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Yan Chen & Peter Cramton & John A. List & Axel Ockenfels, 2021. "Market Design, Human Behavior, and Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5317-5348, September.
    9. Hanny, Lisa & Wagner, Jonathan & Buhl, Hans Ulrich & Heffron, Raphael & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Schöpf, Michael & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2022. "On the progress in flexibility and grid charges in light of the energy transition: The case of Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Crampes, Claude & Salant, David, 2018. "A multi-regional model of electric resource adequacy," TSE Working Papers 18-877, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    11. Ahmed Gailani & Maher Al-Greer & Michael Short & Tracey Crosbie & Nashwan Dawood, 2020. "Lifetime Degradation Cost Analysis for Li-Ion Batteries in Capacity Markets using Accurate Physics-Based Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Axel Ockenfels, 2021. "Pandemiebereitschaft, internationale Kooperation und Marktdesign," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(8), pages 594-596, August.
    13. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Tin Cheuk Leung & Kwok Ping Ping & Kevin K. Tsui, 2019. "What can deregulators deregulate? The case of electricity," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-32, August.
    15. Karsten Neuhoff & Sophia Rüster & Sebastian Schwenen, 2015. "Power Market Design beyond 2020: Time to Revisit Key Elements?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1456, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    16. Christian Gambardella & Michael Pahle & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2016. "Do Benefits from Dynamic Tariffing Rise? Welfare Effects of Real-Time Pricing under Carbon-Tax-Induced Variable Renewable Energy Supply," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1621, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    18. Jonathan M. Lee, 2015. "The Impact of Heterogeneous NOx Regulations on Distributed Electricity Generation in U.S. Manufacturing," Working Papers 15-12, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    19. Robert Gary‐Bobo & Yossi Spiegel, 2006. "Optimal state‐contingent regulation under limited liability," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(2), pages 431-448, June.
    20. Simshauser, Paul, 2024. "On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    D47; H12; H23;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • H12 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Crisis Management
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:102:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s10273-022-3288-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.