IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v26y2017i4d10.1007_s10260-017-0381-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformation approaches of linear random-effects models

Author

Listed:
  • Yongge Tian

    (Central University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

Assume that a linear random-effects model $$\mathbf{y}= \mathbf{X}\varvec{\beta }+ \varvec{\varepsilon }= \mathbf{X}(\mathbf{A}\varvec{\alpha }+ \varvec{\gamma }) + \varvec{\varepsilon }$$ y = X β + ε = X ( A α + γ ) + ε is transformed as $$\mathbf{T}\mathbf{y}= \mathbf{T}\mathbf{X}\varvec{\beta }+ \mathbf{T}\varvec{\varepsilon }= \mathbf{T}\mathbf{X}(\mathbf{A}\varvec{\alpha }+ \varvec{\gamma }) + \mathbf{T}\varvec{\varepsilon }$$ T y = T X β + T ε = T X ( A α + γ ) + T ε by pre-multiplying a given matrix $$\mathbf{T}$$ T of arbitrary rank. These two models are not necessarily equivalent unless $$\mathbf{T}$$ T is of full column rank, and we have to work with this derived model in many situations. Because predictors/estimators of the parameter spaces under the two models are not necessarily the same, it is primary work to compare predictors/estimators in the two models and to establish possible links between the inference results obtained from two models. This paper presents a general algebraic approach to the problem of comparing best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) of parameter spaces in an original linear random-effects model and its transformations, and provides a group of fundamental and comprehensive results on mathematical and statistical properties of the BLUPs. In particular, we construct many equalities for the BLUPs under an original linear random-effects model and its transformations, and obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the equalities to hold.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongge Tian, 2017. "Transformation approaches of linear random-effects models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(4), pages 583-608, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:26:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-017-0381-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-017-0381-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-017-0381-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-017-0381-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth Lange & Eric C. Chi & Hua Zhou, 2014. "A Brief Survey of Modern Optimization for Statisticians," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(1), pages 46-70, April.
    2. Stephen Haslett & Simo Puntanen, 2011. "On the equality of the BLUPs under two linear mixed models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 381-395, November.
    3. Andrzej Kornacki, 1995. "The linear sufficiency and invariant linear sufficiency in a multivariate Gauss-Markov model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 240-241, December.
    4. Drygas, Hilmar, 1985. "Linear sufficiency and some applications in multilinear estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 71-84, February.
    5. Renjun Ma & Bent Jørgensen, 2007. "Nested generalized linear mixed models: an orthodox best linear unbiased predictor approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 625-641, September.
    6. Radosław Kala & Simo Puntanen & Yongge Tian, 2017. "Some notes on linear sufficiency," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Markiewicz, Augustyn, 1998. "Comparison of linear restricted models with respect to the validity of admissible and linearly sufficient estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 347-354, July.
    8. Dong, Baomin & Guo, Wenxing & Tian, Yongge, 2014. "On relations between BLUEs under two transformed linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 279-292.
    9. Louis Guttman, 1944. "General theory and methods for matric factoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Rao, C. Radhakrishna, 1973. "Representations of best linear unbiased estimators in the Gauss-Markoff model with a singular dispersion matrix," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 276-292, September.
    11. Shengjun Gan & Yuqin Sun & Yongge Tian, 2017. "Equivalence of predictors under real and over-parameterized linear models," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(11), pages 5368-5383, June.
    12. J. Shao & J. Zhang, 2015. "A transformation approach in linear mixed-effects models with informative missing responses," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(1), pages 107-119.
    13. Heiligers, Berthold & Markiewicz, Augustyn, 1996. "Linear sufficiency and admissibility in restricted linear models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 105-111, October.
    14. Radosław Kala & Paweł Pordzik, 2009. "Estimation in singular partitioned, reduced or transformed linear models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 633-638, June.
    15. B. Arendacká & S. Puntanen, 2015. "Further remarks on the connection between fixed linear model and mixed linear model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1235-1247, November.
    16. Yongge Tian, 2015. "A new derivation of BLUPs under random-effects model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(8), pages 905-918, November.
    17. Augustyn Markiewicz & Simo Puntanen, 2009. "Admissibility and linear sufficiency in linear model with nuisance parameters," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 847-854, August.
    18. S. Haslett & S. Puntanen & B. Arendacká, 2015. "The link between the mixed and fixed linear models revisited," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 849-861, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nesrin Güler & Melek Eriş Büyükkaya & Melike Yiğit, 2022. "Comparison of Covariance Matrices of Predictors in Seemingly Unrelated Regression Models," Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 801-809, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. J. Haslett & X. Q. Liu & A. Markiewicz & S. Puntanen, 2020. "Some properties of linear sufficiency and the BLUPs in the linear mixed model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 385-401, February.
    2. Changli Lu & Yuqin Sun & Yongge Tian, 2018. "Two competing linear random-effects models and their connections," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1101-1115, September.
    3. Liu, Xu-Qing & Rong, Jian-Ying & Liu, Xiu-Ying, 2008. "Best linear unbiased prediction for linear combinations in general mixed linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(8), pages 1503-1517, September.
    4. Yongge Tian & Wenxing Guo, 2016. "On comparison of dispersion matrices of estimators under a constrained linear model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(4), pages 623-649, November.
    5. Liu, Xu-qing & Rong, Jian-ying, 2007. "Nonnegative quadratic estimation and quadratic sufficiency in general linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 1180-1194, July.
    6. Y. Tian, 2017. "Some equalities and inequalities for covariance matrices of estimators under linear model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 467-484, June.
    7. Tian, Yongge & Zhang, Xuan, 2016. "On connections among OLSEs and BLUEs of whole and partial parameters under a general linear model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 105-112.
    8. Liu, Xu-Qing & Wang, Dong-Dong & Rong, Jian-Ying, 2009. "Quadratic prediction and quadratic sufficiency in finite populations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 1979-1988, October.
    9. Nesrin Güler & Melek Eriş Büyükkaya & Melike Yiğit, 2022. "Comparison of Covariance Matrices of Predictors in Seemingly Unrelated Regression Models," Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 801-809, September.
    10. Jiang, Bo & Tian, Yongge, 2017. "Rank/inertia approaches to weighted least-squares solutions of linear matrix equations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 315(C), pages 400-413.
    11. Yongge Tian & Bo Jiang, 2017. "Quadratic properties of least-squares solutions of linear matrix equations with statistical applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1645-1663, December.
    12. Tian, Yongge & Wang, Cheng, 2017. "On simultaneous prediction in a multivariate general linear model with future observations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 52-59.
    13. Bo Jiang & Yongge Tian, 2022. "Equivalence Analysis of Statistical Inference Results under True and Misspecified Multivariate Linear Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Tian, Yongge & Jiang, Bo, 2016. "Equalities for estimators of partial parameters under linear model with restrictions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 299-313.
    15. Markiewicz, Augustyn, 1998. "Comparison of linear restricted models with respect to the validity of admissible and linearly sufficient estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 347-354, July.
    16. Liu, Xin & Wang, Qing-Wen, 2013. "Equality of the BLUPs under the mixed linear model when random components and errors are correlated," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 297-309.
    17. Ren, Xingwei, 2016. "Estimation in singular linear models with stepwise inclusion of linear restrictions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 60-72.
    18. Louis Guttman, 1955. "A generalized simplex for factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 20(3), pages 173-192, September.
    19. Stephen Haslett & Simo Puntanen, 2011. "On the equality of the BLUPs under two linear mixed models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 381-395, November.
    20. Louis Guttman, 1954. "Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(2), pages 149-161, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:26:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-017-0381-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.