IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v3y2022i4d10.1007_s43069-022-00173-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Partially Backlogged Inventory Model for Time-Deteriorating Items Using Penalty Cost and Time-Dependent Holding Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Biman Kanti Nath

    (Assam University)

  • Nabendu Sen

    (Assam University)

Abstract

This paper presents an inventory model for items that do not deteriorate for some period of time but after that period they continuously deteriorate and lose their utility, thereby incorporating loss to the system. This degree of loss is expressed by penalty cost function. The prime focus of this work is to develop the economic order quantity model for time-deteriorating items that takes into account penalty cost incurred due to utility deterioration. The demand of the item is considered to be time-dependent. To represent a dynamic market behaviour, holding cost is taken as linear function of time. The objective of this model is to find optimal ordering quantity and optimal shortage occurrence time with a view to minimize the total average cost of the system. Necessary theoretical results are formulated in order to minimizing total cost function and based on which a solution algorithm is designed. Furthermore, a numerical example is taken to illustrate the model and sensitivity analysis is performed with respect to some important inventory parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Biman Kanti Nath & Nabendu Sen, 2022. "A Partially Backlogged Inventory Model for Time-Deteriorating Items Using Penalty Cost and Time-Dependent Holding Cost," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:3:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-022-00173-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-022-00173-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-022-00173-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-022-00173-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Amin Khan, Md. & Shaikh, Ali Akbar & Konstantaras, Ioannis & Bhunia, Asoke Kumar & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2020. "Inventory models for perishable items with advanced payment, linearly time-dependent holding cost and demand dependent on advertisement and selling price," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. C.K. Sivashankari, 2019. "Purchasing inventory models for exponential demand with deteriorating items and discounted cost-in third order equation," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 321-335.
    3. Jain, Karuna & Silver, Edward A., 1994. "Lot sizing for a product subject to obsolescence or perishability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 287-295, June.
    4. Steven Nahmias, 1982. "Perishable Inventory Theory: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 680-708, August.
    5. Wu, Jiang & Chang, Chun-Tao & Teng, Jinn-Tsair & Lai, Kuei-Kuei, 2017. "Optimal order quantity and selling price over a product life cycle with deterioration rate linked to expiration date," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 343-351.
    6. Goyal, S. K. & Giri, B. C., 2001. "Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Nabendu Sen & Sumit Saha, 2018. "An inventory model for deteriorating items with time dependent holding cost and shortages under permissible delay in payment," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 518-531.
    8. Md. Al-Amin Khan & Ali Akbar Shaikh & Gobinda Chandra Panda & Asoke Kumar Bhunia & Ioannis Konstantaras, 2020. "Non-instantaneous deterioration effect in ordering decisions for a two-warehouse inventory system under advance payment and backlogging," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 243-275, June.
    9. Purushottaman Nandakumar & Thomas E. Morton, 1993. "Near Myopic Heuristics for the Fixed-Life Perishability Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(12), pages 1490-1498, December.
    10. R.P. Tripathi, 2018. "Deterministic inventory models with nonlinear time-dependent and stock-dependent holding cost under non-increasing time-sensitive demand," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3), pages 326-336.
    11. Sushil Kumar, 2019. "An EOQ model for deteriorating items with time-dependent exponential demand rate and penalty cost," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 29(3), pages 37-49.
    12. R.P. Tripathi & S.M. Mishra, 2016. "EOQ model with linear time dependent demand and different holding cost functions," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 452-466.
    13. Fujiwara, Okitsugu & Perera, U. L. J. S. R., 1993. "EOQ models for continuously deteriorating products using linear and exponential penalty costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 104-114, October.
    14. Pal, S. & Goswami, A. & Chaudhuri, K. S., 1993. "A deterministic inventory model for deteriorating items with stock-dependent demand rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 291-299, November.
    15. Chang, Chun-Tao & Ouyang, Liang-Yuh & Teng, Jinn-Tsair & Lai, Kuei-Kuei & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2019. "Manufacturer's pricing and lot-sizing decisions for perishable goods under various payment terms by a discounted cash flow analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 83-95.
    16. Ming-Feng Yang & Wei-Chung Tseng, 2015. "Deteriorating Inventory Model for Chilled Food," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-10, April.
    17. Bakker, Monique & Riezebos, Jan & Teunter, Ruud H., 2012. "Review of inventory systems with deterioration since 2001," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 275-284.
    18. Hariga, Moncer, 1997. "Optimal inventory policies for perishable items with time-dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 35-41, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Lin & Wang, Wan-Chih & Teng, Jinn-Tsair & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2022. "Pricing and lot-sizing decision for fresh goods when demand depends on unit price, displaying stocks and product age under generalized payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 940-952.
    2. Goyal, S. K. & Giri, B. C., 2001. "Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Gorria, Carlos & Lezaun, Mikel & López, F. Javier, 2022. "Performance measures of nonstationary inventory models for perishable products under the EWA policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1137-1150.
    4. Kun-Jen Chung & Jui-Jung Liao & Hari Mohan Srivastava & Shih-Fang Lee & Shy-Der Lin, 2021. "The EOQ Model for Deteriorating Items with a Conditional Trade Credit Linked to Order Quantity in a Supply Chain System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-28, September.
    5. Feng, Lin & Chan, Ya-Lan & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo, 2017. "Pricing and lot-sizing polices for perishable goods when the demand depends on selling price, displayed stocks, and expiration date," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 11-20.
    6. Yan Shi & Zhiyong Zhang & Sunil Tiwari & Zhiwen Tao, 2022. "Retailer's optimal strategy for a perishable product with increasing demand under various payment schemes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 899-929, August.
    7. Ruibin Bai & Graham Kendall, 2008. "A Model for Fresh Produce Shelf-Space Allocation and Inventory Management with Freshness-Condition-Dependent Demand," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 78-85, February.
    8. V. Radhamani & B. Sivakumar & G. Arivarignan, 2022. "A Comparative Study on Replenishment Policies for Perishable Inventory System with Service Facility and Multiple Server Vacation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 229-265, March.
    9. Alamri, Adel A. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2018. "Beyond LIFO and FIFO: Exploring an Allocation-In-Fraction-Out (AIFO) policy in a two-warehouse inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 33-45.
    10. Ketzenberg, Michael & Oliva, Rogelio & Wang, Yimin & Webster, Scott, 2023. "Retailer inventory data sharing in a fresh product supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 680-693.
    11. Janssen, Larissa & Diabat, Ali & Sauer, Jürgen & Herrmann, Frank, 2018. "A stochastic micro-periodic age-based inventory replenishment policy for perishable goods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 445-465.
    12. Omar Ahumada & J. Villalobos, 2011. "A tactical model for planning the production and distribution of fresh produce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 339-358, October.
    13. Duan, Qinglin & Liao, T. Warren, 2013. "A new age-based replenishment policy for supply chain inventory optimization of highly perishable products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 658-671.
    14. Hwang, Hark & Hahn, Kyu Hun, 2000. "An optimal procurement policy for items with an inventory level-dependent demand rate and fixed lifetime," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(3), pages 537-545, December.
    15. Dobson, Gregory & Pinker, Edieal J. & Yildiz, Ozlem, 2017. "An EOQ model for perishable goods with age-dependent demand rate," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 84-88.
    16. S. Panda & S. Saha & M. Basu, 2009. "An EOQ model for perishable products with discounted selling price and stock dependent demand," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 17(1), pages 31-53, March.
    17. Beullens, Patrick & Ghiami, Yousef, 2022. "Waste reduction in the supply chain of a deteriorating food item – Impact of supply structure on retailer performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1017-1034.
    18. Li‐Ming Chen & Amar Sapra, 2021. "Inventory renewal for a perishable product: Economies of scale and age‐dependent demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(3), pages 359-377, April.
    19. N. Saranya & A. Shophia Lawrence, 2019. "A stochastic inventory system with replacement of perishable items," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 563-582, June.
    20. Onur Kaya & Aylin Lelizar Polat, 2017. "Coordinated pricing and inventory decisions for perishable products," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 589-606, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:3:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-022-00173-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.