IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v80y2009i1d10.1007_s11192-007-2054-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International differences of productivity in scholarly management knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Ernesto R. Gantman

    (Universidad de Belgrano)

Abstract

Using a dataset of refereed conference papers, this work explores the determinants of academic production in the field of management. The estimation of a count data model shows that the countries’ level of economic development and their economy size have a positive and highly significant effect on scholarly management knowledge production. The linguistic variable (English as official language), which has been cited by the literature as an important factor facilitating the participation in the international scientific arena, has also a positive and statistically significant effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernesto R. Gantman, 2009. "International differences of productivity in scholarly management knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(1), pages 153-165, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:80:y:2009:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-007-2054-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-2054-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-007-2054-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-007-2054-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeileis, Achim & Kleiber, Christian & Jackman, Simon, 2008. "Regression Models for Count Data in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 27(i08).
    2. Engwall, Lars, 2007. "The anatomy of management education," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 4-35, March.
    3. Hodgson, Geoffrey M & Rothman, Harry, 1999. "The Editors and Authors of Economics Journals: A Case of Institutional Oligopoly?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 109(453), pages 165-186, February.
    4. Carmelo Mazza, 1998. "The Popularization of Business Knowledge Diffusion: From Academic Knowledge to Popular Culture?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: José Luis Alvarez (ed.), The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge, chapter 6, pages 164-181, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Thed van Leeuwen, 2006. "The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(1), pages 133-154, January.
    6. Engwall, Lars, 1996. "The Vikings versus the world: An examination of Nordic business research," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 425-436, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Emanuel Mueller, 2016. "Accurate forecast of countries’ research output by macro-level indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 1307-1328, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John E. Cicala & Natasha Delcoure & Barbara R. Oates, 2017. "Does Benchmarking Hinder Mission Diversity Of Aacsb-Accredited Schools: Evidence From The U.S. And Europe," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14.
    2. Totterman, Stephen, 2021. "Vehicle-based recreation and compliance for three beaches in northern New South Wales," OSF Preprints ja8h6, Center for Open Science.
    3. Fine, Ben, 2002. "Economics Imperialism and the New Development Economics as Kuhnian Paradigm Shift?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2057-2070, December.
    4. Jong-Hyun Kim & Yong-Gil Lee, 2021. "Factors of Collaboration Affecting the Performance of Alternative Energy Patents in South Korea from 2010 to 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Olga Alipova & Lada Litvinova & Andrey Lovakov & Maria Yudkevich, 2018. "Inbreds And Non-Inbreds Among Russian Academics: Short-Term Similarity And Long-Term Differences In Productivity," HSE Working papers WP BRP 48/EDU/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Christian Kleiber & Achim Zeileis, 2016. "Visualizing Count Data Regressions Using Rootograms," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 296-303, July.
    7. Justus Haucap & Johannes Muck, 2015. "What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 849-877, June.
    8. Cloos, Janis & Greiff, Matthias & Rusch, Hannes, 2020. "Geographical Concentration and Editorial Favoritism within the Field of Laboratory Experimental Economics (RM/19/029-revised-)," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    9. Sewando, Ponsian T. & Mdoe, N. Y. S. & Mutabazi, K. D. S, 2011. "Farmers’ preferential choice decisions to alternative cassava value chain strands in Morogoro rural district, Tanzania," MPRA Paper 29797, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. João Faria & Rajeev Goel, 2010. "Returns to networking in academia," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 103-117, July.
    11. Anne-Wil Harzing & Isabel Metz, 2013. "Practicing what We Preach," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 169-187, April.
    12. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    13. Sean J. Blamires & Cheng-Hui Lai & Ren-Chung Cheng & Chen-Pan Liao & Pao-Sheng Shen & I-Min Tso, 2012. "Body spot coloration of a nocturnal sit-and-wait predator visually lures prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 69-74.
    14. Geert Campenhout & Tom Caneghem & Steve Uytbergen, 2008. "A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 61-90, October.
    15. Lawrence N Kazembe, 2013. "A Bayesian Two Part Model Applied to Analyze Risk Factors of Adult Mortality with Application to Data from Namibia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
    16. Oliver Fabel & Miriam Hein & Robert Hofmeister, 2008. "Research Productivity in Business Economics: An Investigation of Austrian, German and Swiss Universities," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(4), pages 506-531, November.
    17. Hanen Khaldi & Vicente Prado-Gascó, 2021. "Bibliometric maps and co-word analysis of the literature on international cooperation on migration," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1845-1869, October.
    18. Zhigao Liu & Yimei Yin & Weidong Liu & Michael Dunford, 2015. "Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 135-158, April.
    19. Erich Striessnig & Elke Loichinger, 2015. "Future differential vulnerability to natural disasters by level of education," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 13(1), pages 221-240.
    20. Matthias Aistleitner & Jakob Kapeller & Stefan Steinerberger, 2018. "Citation Patterns in Economics and Beyond," Working Papers Series 85, Institute for New Economic Thinking.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:80:y:2009:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-007-2054-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.