IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/schmbr/v70y2018i3d10.1007_s41464-018-0052-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individuals’ Perception and Processing of Risk Information: Exploratory Evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Kathrin Kureck

    (University of Rostock)

  • Susanne Homölle

    (University of Rostock)

Abstract

This paper presents a first exploratory study to analyze private investors’ perceptions regarding risk reporting. With the help of think-aloud protocols, we gain insight into how and to what extent readers perceive risk information of a German savings bank, which specific information cues are relevant for informed judgment and decision-making, and whether these assessments are correct in relation to an expert benchmark. The results reveal that, during the reading process, the perceived information broadly coincides with the structure of the risk report considered. Only little information is indeed relevant. Information about the risk exposure is more relevant than information about the risk management system for the participants’ judgments and decisions, but each of them play an important role. On average, the participants’ assessments are actually in line with the expert benchmark and can therefore be considered correct–even the information cues mentioned as relevant are similar. These results provide a first indication of preferable approaches to risk reporting from the addressees’ point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathrin Kureck & Susanne Homölle, 2018. "Individuals’ Perception and Processing of Risk Information: Exploratory Evidence from Germany," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 70(3), pages 255-284, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:schmbr:v:70:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s41464-018-0052-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s41464-018-0052-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41464-018-0052-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41464-018-0052-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elshandidy, Tamer & Shrives, Philip J., 2016. "Environmental Incentives for and Usefulness of Textual Risk Reporting: Evidence from Germany," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 464-486.
    2. Jacoby, Jacob & Chestnut, Robert W & Silberman, William, 1977. "Consumer Use and Comprehension of Nutrition Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(2), pages 119-128, Se.
    3. Niranjan Chipalkatti & Vinay Datar, 2006. "The relevance of value-at-risk disclosures: evidence from the LTCM crisis," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 14(2), pages 174-184, May.
    4. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2014. "Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(4), pages 1643-1671, August.
    5. Miihkinen, Antti, 2013. "The usefulness of firm risk disclosures under different firm riskiness, investor-interest, and market conditions: New evidence from Finland," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 312-331.
    6. Allen Berger & Rima Turk-Ariss, 2015. "Do Depositors Discipline Banks and Did Government Actions During the Recent Crisis Reduce this Discipline? An International Perspective," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 48(2), pages 103-126, October.
    7. Malhotra, Naresh K, 1982. "Information Load and Consumer Decision Making," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(4), pages 419-430, March.
    8. Libby, Robert & Bloomfield, Robert & Nelson, Mark W., 2002. "Experimental research in financial accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 775-810, November.
    9. Jannis Bischof, 2009. "The Effects of IFRS 7 Adoption on Bank Disclosure in Europe," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 167-194, December.
    10. Jason Ball & Victor Fang, 2010. "Value-At-Risk Disclosures And The Implications On Bank Stakeholders," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Lloyd P Blenman & Harold A Black & Edward J Kane (ed.), Banking And Capital Markets New International Perspectives, chapter 1, pages 3-27, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2011. "When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10‐Ks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(1), pages 35-65, February.
    12. Miihkinen, Antti, 2012. "What Drives Quality of Firm Risk Disclosure?," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 437-468.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Hussainey, Khaled & Nawaz, Tasawar & Ntim, Collins & Elamer, Ahmed, 2022. "A systematic literature review on risk disclosure research: State-of-the-art and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Acheampong, Albert & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2021. "Does soft information determine credit risk? Text-based evidence from European banks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Hyunkwon Cho & Robert Kim, 2021. "Asymmetric effects of voluntary disclosure on stock liquidity: evidence from 8‐K filings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 803-846, March.
    4. Azam Pouryousof & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Reza Hesarzadeh & Davood Askarany, 2022. "The Relationship between Managers’ Disclosure Tone and the Trading Volume of Investors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Kim, Hyonok & Yasuda, Yukihiro, 2018. "Business risk disclosure and firm risk: Evidence from Japan," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 413-426.
    6. Bonsall, Samuel B. & Leone, Andrew J. & Miller, Brian P. & Rennekamp, Kristina, 2017. "A plain English measure of financial reporting readability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 329-357.
    7. Wu, Chen-Hui & Lin, Chan-Jane, 2017. "The impact of media coverage on investor trading behavior and stock returns," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 151-172.
    8. Issal Haj-Salem & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "Does Risk Disclosure Matter for Trade Credit?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Yan Luo & Linying Zhou, 2020. "Textual tone in corporate financial disclosures: a survey of the literature," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 101-110, September.
    10. Qian Wang & Duowen Wu & Lina Yan, 2021. "Effect of positive tone in MD&A disclosure on capital structure adjustment speed: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5809-5845, December.
    11. Umar, Tarik, 2022. "Complexity aversion when SeekingAlpha," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    12. Liu, Pu & Nguyen, Hazel T., 2020. "CEO characteristics and tone at the top inconsistency," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Samuel B. Bonsall & Brian P. Miller, 2017. "The impact of narrative disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 608-643, June.
    14. Ahmed, Yousry & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2016. "The effect of bidder conservatism on M&A decisions: Text-based evidence from US 10-K filings," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 176-190.
    15. Li, Frank Weikai & Sun, Chengzhu, 2022. "Information acquisition and expected returns: Evidence from EDGAR search traffic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    16. Diego F. Téllez & Jesús M. Godoy, 2017. "Mission Power and Firm Financial Performance," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 15655, Universidad EAFIT.
    17. Beattie, Vivien, 2014. "Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 111-134.
    18. Stephen J. Smulowitz & Didier Cossin & Hongze Lu, 2023. "Managerial Short-Termism and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Role of External Monitoring," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 759-778, December.
    19. Sanjiv Das & Xin Huang & Soji Adeshina & Patrick Yang & Leonardo Bachega, 2023. "Credit Risk Modeling with Graph Machine Learning," INFORMS Joural on Data Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 197-217, October.
    20. Kumar, Rahul & Deb, Soumya Guha & Mukherjee, Shubhadeep, 2020. "Do words reveal the latent truth? Identifying communication patterns of corporate losers," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk reporting; Risk exposure; Risk management system; Text processing; Thinking aloud;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:schmbr:v:70:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s41464-018-0052-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.