IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v90y2018i3d10.1007_s11134-018-9571-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Queuing network models for panel sizing in oncology

Author

Listed:
  • Peter T. Vanberkel

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Nelly Litvak

    (University of Twente
    Eindhoven University of Technology)

  • Martin L. Puterman

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Scott Tyldesley

    (British Columbia Cancer Agency)

Abstract

Motivated by practices and issues at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), we develop queuing network models to determine the appropriate number of patients to be managed by a single physician. This is often referred to as a physician’s panel size. The key features that distinguish our study of oncology practices from other panel size models are high patient turnover rates, multiple patient and appointment types, and follow-up care. The paper develops stationary and non-stationary queuing network models corresponding to stabilized and developing practices, respectively. These models are used to determine new patient arrival rates that ensure practices operate within certain performance thresholds. Data from the BCCA are used to calibrate and illustrate the implications of these models.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter T. Vanberkel & Nelly Litvak & Martin L. Puterman & Scott Tyldesley, 2018. "Queuing network models for panel sizing in oncology," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 291-306, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:90:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-018-9571-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-018-9571-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-018-9571-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-018-9571-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Kan & McGinnis, Leon, 2012. "Performance evaluation for general queueing networks in manufacturing systems: Characterizing the trade-off between queue time and utilization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 328-339.
    2. Linda V. Green & Sergei Savin, 2008. "Reducing Delays for Medical Appointments: A Queueing Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1526-1538, December.
    3. Asli Ozen & Hari Balasubramanian, 2013. "The impact of case mix on timely access to appointments in a primary care group practice," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 101-118, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zander, Anne & Nickel, Stefan & Vanberkel, Peter, 2021. "Managing the intake of new patients into a physician panel over time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 391-403.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hessam Bavafa & Sergei Savin & Christian Terwiesch, 2021. "Customizing Primary Care Delivery Using E‐Visits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4306-4327, November.
    2. Xiao Yu & Armagan Bayram, 2021. "Managing capacity for virtual and office appointments in chronic care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 742-767, December.
    3. Farbod Farhadi & Sina Ansari & Francisco Jara-Moroni, 2023. "Optimization models for patient and technician scheduling in hemodialysis centers," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 558-582, September.
    4. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    5. Zander, Anne & Nickel, Stefan & Vanberkel, Peter, 2021. "Managing the intake of new patients into a physician panel over time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 391-403.
    6. Masoud Kamalahmadi & Kurt M. Bretthauer & Jonathan E. Helm & Alex F. Mills & Edwin C. Coe & Alisa Judy-Malcolm & Areeba Kara & Julian Pan, 2023. "Mixing It Up: Operational Impact of Hospitalist Caseload and Case-Mix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 283-307, January.
    7. Dogru, Ali K. & Melouk, Sharif H., 2019. "Adaptive appointment scheduling for patient-centered medical homes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 166-181.
    8. Izady, Navid, 2019. "An integrated approach to demand and capacity planning in outpatient clinics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 645-656.
    9. Wen-Ya Wang & Diwakar Gupta, 2011. "Adaptive Appointment Systems with Patient Preferences," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 373-389, July.
    10. Morabito, Reinaldo & de Souza, Mauricio C. & Vazquez, Mariana, 2014. "Approximate decomposition methods for the analysis of multicommodity flow routing in generalized queuing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 618-629.
    11. Katsumi Morikawa & Katsuhiko Takahashi & Daisuke Hirotani, 2018. "Performance evaluation of candidate appointment schedules using clearing functions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 509-518, March.
    12. Li Luo & Ying Zhou & Bernard T. Han & Jialing Li, 2019. "An optimization model to determine appointment scheduling window for an outpatient clinic with patient no-shows," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 68-84, March.
    13. Nan Liu & Serhan Ziya & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni, 2010. "Dynamic Scheduling of Outpatient Appointments Under Patient No-Shows and Cancellations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 347-364, September.
    14. Qu, Xiuli & Shi, Jing, 2011. "Modeling the effect of patient choice on the performance of open access scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 314-327, February.
    15. Wu, Kan & Zhao, Ning, 2015. "Dependence among single stations in series and its applications in productivity improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 245-258.
    16. Fengfeng Huang & Pengfei Guo & Yulan Wang, 2022. "Modeling Patients' Illness Perception and Equilibrium Analysis of Their Doctor Shopping Behavior," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1216-1234, March.
    17. Lara Wiesche & Matthias Schacht & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "Strategies for interday appointment scheduling in primary care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 403-418, September.
    18. Gang Du & Xinyue Li & Hui Hu & Xiaoling Ouyang, 2018. "Optimizing Daily Service Scheduling for Medical Diagnostic Equipment Considering Patient Satisfaction and Hospital Revenue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    19. Hessam Bavafa & Lorin M. Hitt & Christian Terwiesch, 2018. "The Impact of E-Visits on Visit Frequencies and Patient Health: Evidence from Primary Care," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(12), pages 5461-5480, December.
    20. David D. Cho & Kurt M. Bretthauer & Jan Schoenfelder, 2023. "Patient-to-nurse ratios: Balancing quality, nurse turnover, and cost," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 807-826, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:90:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-018-9571-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.