IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v52y2018i2d10.1007_s11135-018-0697-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel method as a diagnostic tool for the detection of influential observations in the Cox proportional hazards model

Author

Listed:
  • Nuriye Sancar

    (Near East University)

  • Deniz Inan

    (Marmara University)

Abstract

It is important that the process of studying and modelling the prognosis of disability should be conducted using time-to-event data, as the dynamic nature of disability could cause intervention on the modifiable (prognostic) factors, thus changing the course to a more favourable outcome. In disability research, the Cox PH model is frequently used to identify prognostic factors for the life expectancy of people with disabilities and to evaluate the treatment effects on the time to event. Accurate detection of influential observations is an important factor when fitting the Cox PH model, as influential observations in the Cox PH model can cause model misspecification, inaccurately determined factors, missed valuable biological information and/or violation of the proportional hazard assumption. In this paper, a novel multiple case detection method for influential observations is recommended in the Cox model. The aim of the paper is to inform clinicians and researchers who use the Cox PH model for describing the survival time as a function of multiple prognostic factors, regarding the importance of the detection of influential observations that can lead to misleading conclusions if they are present in the data set. The efficiency of the proposed method is presented through the real dataset. Additionally, in the specific case of North Cyprus, the aim is emphasize the importance of survival modelling studies that determine the prognostic factors affecting the lives of people with disabilities, to improve life quality and to develop a plan for healthier and higher quality life styles programmes for people with disabilities. As a first step, it is recommended that a system of database records of disabilities should be established and maintained by the government to raise public awareness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuriye Sancar & Deniz Inan, 2018. "A novel method as a diagnostic tool for the detection of influential observations in the Cox proportional hazards model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 1253-1266, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-018-0697-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-018-0697-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-018-0697-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-018-0697-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mithat Gonen & Glenn Heller, 2005. "Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regression," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(4), pages 965-970, December.
    2. Majer, I.M. & Nusselder, W.J. & Mackenbach, J.P. & Klijs, B. & Van Baal, P.H.M., 2011. "Mortality risk associated with disability: A population-based record linkage study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(12), pages 9-15.
    3. Alessandra Nardi & Michael Schemper, 1999. "New Residuals for Cox Regression and Their Application to Outlier Screening," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 523-529, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Fanyin & Fu, Lijun & Li, Zhiyong & Xu, Jiawei, 2022. "The recurrence of financial distress: A survival analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1100-1115.
    2. Lin Lu & Laurent Dercle & Binsheng Zhao & Lawrence H. Schwartz, 2021. "Deep learning for the prediction of early on-treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer from serial medical imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Arazmuradov, Annageldy, 2016. "Assessing sovereign debt default by efficiency," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 100-113.
    4. Liu Xinhua & Jin Zhezhen, 2009. "A Non-Parametric Approach to Scale Reduction for Uni-Dimensional Screening Scales," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Irene Albarrán Lozano & Pablo J. Alonso-González & José Javier Núñez-Velázquez, 2021. "Estimation of Life Expectancy for Dependent Population in a Multi-State Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Chrianna I Bharat & Kevin Murray & Edward Cripps & Melinda R Hodkiewicz, 2018. "Methods for displaying and calibration of Cox proportional hazards models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 105-115, February.
    7. Jinwook Bahk & Hee-Yeon Kang & Young-Ho Khang, 2019. "The Life Expectancy Gap between Registered Disabled and Non-Disabled People in Korea from 2004 to 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-9, July.
    8. Jung Min Park & Ukchan Oh & Beop-Rae Roh & Yeongmin Moon, 2017. "Disparities in mortality by disability: an 11-year follow-up study of 1 million individuals," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(9), pages 989-996, December.
    9. J. Iñaki De La Peña & M. Cristina Fernández-Ramos & Asier Garayeta & Iratxe D. Martín, 2022. "Transforming Private Pensions: An Actuarial Model to Face Long-Term Costs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Farcomeni, Alessio & Nardi, Alessandra, 2010. "A two-component Weibull mixture to model early and late mortality in a Bayesian framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 416-428, February.
    11. Steven A. Haas & Katsuya Oi & Zhangjun Zhou, 2017. "The Life Course, Cohort Dynamics, and International Differences in Aging Trajectories," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(6), pages 2043-2071, December.
    12. Morbiducci, Marta & Nardi, Alessandra & Rossi, Carla, 2003. "Classification of "cured" individuals in survival analysis: the mixture approach to the diagnostic-prognostic problem," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 515-529, January.
    13. Sean M. Devlin & Mithat Gönen & Glenn Heller, 2020. "Measuring the temporal prognostic utility of a baseline risk score," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 856-871, October.
    14. Yilong Zhang & Xiaoxia Han & Yongzhao Shao, 2021. "The ROC of Cox proportional hazards cure models with application in cancer studies," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 195-215, April.
    15. Schmid, Matthias & Tutz, Gerhard & Welchowski, Thomas, 2018. "Discrimination measures for discrete time-to-event predictions," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 153-164.
    16. Claire Marbot & Delphine Roy, 2015. "Projections du coût de l’APA et des caractéristiques de ses bénéficiaires à l’horizon 2040 à l’aide du modèle Destinie," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 481(1), pages 185-209.
    17. Charmaine Pei Ling Lee & Hyungwon Choi & Khee Chee Soo & Min-Han Tan & Wen Yee Chay & Kee Seng Chia & Jenny Liu & Jingmei Li & Mikael Hartman, 2015. "Mammographic Breast Density and Common Genetic Variants in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Olga Grigoriev & Gabriele Doblhammer, 2022. "Does the Mortality of Individuals with Severe Disabilities Contribute to the Persistent East–West Mortality Gap Among German Men?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(2), pages 247-271, May.
    19. Ruosha Li & Jing Ning & Ziding Feng, 2022. "Estimation and inference of predictive discrimination for survival outcome risk prediction models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 219-240, April.
    20. Saskia Groot & Irene Santi & Pieter Bakx & Bram Wouterse & Pieter Baal, 2023. "Informal Care Costs According to Age and Proximity to Death to Support Cost-Effectiveness Analyses," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(9), pages 1137-1149, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-018-0697-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.