IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v41y2007i2p177-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Distance, Respondent Cooperation and Item Nonresponse in Sex Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Su-Hao Tu
  • Pei-Shan Liao

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Su-Hao Tu & Pei-Shan Liao, 2007. "Social Distance, Respondent Cooperation and Item Nonresponse in Sex Survey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 177-199, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:41:y:2007:i:2:p:177-199
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-007-9088-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-007-9088-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-007-9088-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darren W. Davis & Brian D. Silver, 2003. "Stereotype Threat and Race of Interviewer Effects in a Survey on Political Knowledge," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 33-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eugenio Paglino & Tom Emery, 2020. "Evaluating interviewer manipulation in the new round of the Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(50), pages 1461-1494.
    2. Himelein,Kristen, 2015. "Interviewer effects in subjective survey questions: evidence from Timor-Leste," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7208, The World Bank.
    3. Harris, J. Andrew & van der Windt, Peter, 2023. "Empowering women or increasing response bias? Experimental evidence from Congo," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Phillips Angelica & Stenger Rachel, 2022. "The Effect of Burdensome Survey Questions on Data Quality in an Omnibus Survey," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 1019-1050, December.
    5. Bonaccolto-Töpfer, Marina & Briel, Stephanie, 2022. "The gender pay gap revisited: Does machine learning offer new insights?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tricia Koroknay†Palicz & Joao Montalvao, 2020. "Sex, Lies, and Surveys: The Role of Interviewer Characteristics," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 3313-3324.
    2. Niklas Egels-Zandén, 2014. "Revisiting Supplier Compliance with MNC Codes of Conduct: Recoupling Policy and Practice at Chinese Toy Suppliers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 59-75, January.
    3. Eugenio Paglino & Tom Emery, 2020. "Evaluating interviewer manipulation in the new round of the Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(50), pages 1461-1494.
    4. Rebecca Pietrelli & Marco d’Errico & Kate Dassesse, 2021. "Measuring household food security through surveys: Do the characteristics of the enumerators matter?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(6), pages 911-925, November.
    5. Niklas Egels‐Zandén & Markus Kallifatides, 2009. "The UN Global Compact and the Enlightenment tradition: a rural electrification project under the aegis of the UN Global Compact," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(5), pages 264-277, September.
    6. A. Olu Oyinlade & Alex Losen, 2014. "Extraneous Effects of Race, Gender, and Race-Gender Homo- and Heterophily Conditions on Data Quality," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    7. McGinnity, Frances & Creighton, Mathew & Fahey, Éamonn, 2020. "Hidden versus revealed attitudes: a list experiment on support for minorities in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT372, June.
    8. Niklas Egels-Zandén, 2007. "Suppliers’ Compliance with MNCs’ Codes of Conduct: Behind the Scenes at Chinese Toy Suppliers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 45-62, September.
    9. Kissner, Jason & Pyrooz, David C., 2009. "Self-control, differential association, and gang membership: A theoretical and empirical extension of the literature," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 478-487, September.
    10. Weihua An & Christopher Winship, 2017. "Causal Inference in Panel Data With Application to Estimating Race-of-Interviewer Effects in the General Social Survey," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(1), pages 68-102, January.
    11. Catherine Simpson Bueker, 2021. "“It’s Because You Don’t See Yourself as Unequal to Anybody”: Exploring the Segmented Assimilation Model in the Experiences of 1.5- and 2nd-Generation Women in an Elite Public High School," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 791-807, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:41:y:2007:i:2:p:177-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.