IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v86y2021i1d10.1007_s11336-020-09742-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Penalized EM Algorithm to Infer Learning Trajectories in Latent Transition CDM

Author

Listed:
  • Chun Wang

    (University of Washington)

Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) have arisen as advanced psychometric models in the past few decades for assessments that intend to measure students’ mastery of a set of attributes. Recently, quite a few studies attempted to extend CDMs to longitudinal versions, and they all tended to model transition probabilities from non-mastery to mastery or vice versa for each attribute separately, with an exception of a few studies (e.g., Chen et al. 2018; Madison & Bradshaw 2018). However, these pioneering works have not taken into consideration the attribute relationships and the ever-changing attributes in a learning period. In this paper, we consider a profile-level latent transition CDM (TCDM hereafter), which can not only identify transition probabilities across the same attributes over time, but also the transition pathways across different attributes. Two versions of the penalized expectation-maximization (PEM) algorithms are proposed to shrink the probabilities associated with impermissible transition pathways to 0 and, thereby, help explore attribute relationships in a longitudinal setting. Simulation results reveal that PEM with group penalty holds great promise for identifying learning trajectories.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun Wang, 2021. "Using Penalized EM Algorithm to Infer Learning Trajectories in Latent Transition CDM," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 167-189, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:86:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11336-020-09742-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-020-09742-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-020-09742-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-020-09742-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiahua Chen & Zehua Chen, 2008. "Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(3), pages 759-771.
    2. Susan Embretson (Whitely), 1984. "A general latent trait model for response processes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(2), pages 175-186, June.
    3. Jimmy de la Torre, 2011. "The Generalized DINA Model Framework," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 179-199, April.
    4. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    5. Hansheng Wang & Bo Li & Chenlei Leng, 2009. "Shrinkage tuning parameter selection with a diverging number of parameters," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 671-683, June.
    6. Curtis Tatsuoka, 2002. "Data analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 51(3), pages 337-350, July.
    7. David Siegmund, 2004. "Model selection in irregular problems: Applications to mapping quantitative trait loci," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(4), pages 785-800, December.
    8. Yingying Fan & Cheng Yong Tang, 2013. "Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 531-552, June.
    9. Susan Embretson & Xiangdong Yang, 2013. "A Multicomponent Latent Trait Model for Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 14-36, January.
    10. Karl W. Broman & Terence P. Speed, 2002. "A model selection approach for the identification of quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 641-656, October.
    11. Jimmy Torre, 2011. "Erratum to: The Generalized DINA Model Framework," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 510-510, July.
    12. Hwan Chung & Brian P. Flaherty & Joseph L. Schafer, 2006. "Latent class logistic regression: application to marijuana use and attitudes among high school seniors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(4), pages 723-743, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi, 2023. "Bayesian Analysis Methods for Two-Level Diagnosis Classification Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(6), pages 773-809, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2017. "Regularized Latent Class Analysis with Application in Cognitive Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 660-692, September.
    2. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou & Liu, Jingchen & Ying, Zhiliang, 2017. "Regularized latent class analysis with application in cognitive diagnosis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103182, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Wang, Tao & Zhu, Lixing, 2011. "Consistent tuning parameter selection in high dimensional sparse linear regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(7), pages 1141-1151, August.
    4. Juntao Wang & Yuan Li, 2023. "DINA Model with Entropy Penalization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Chenchen Ma & Jing Ouyang & Gongjun Xu, 2023. "Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 175-207, March.
    6. Yawei He & Zehua Chen, 2016. "The EBIC and a sequential procedure for feature selection in interactive linear models with high-dimensional data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 68(1), pages 155-180, February.
    7. Kaixu Yang & Tapabrata Maiti, 2022. "Ultrahigh‐dimensional generalized additive model: Unified theory and methods," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 917-942, September.
    8. Burman, Prabir & Paul, Debashis, 2017. "Smooth predictive model fitting in regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 165-179.
    9. Matthew S. Johnson & Sandip Sinharay, 2020. "The Reliability of the Posterior Probability of Skill Attainment in Diagnostic Classification Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(1), pages 5-31, February.
    10. Zak-Szatkowska, Malgorzata & Bogdan, Malgorzata, 2011. "Modified versions of the Bayesian Information Criterion for sparse Generalized Linear Models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2908-2924, November.
    11. Sakyajit Bhattacharya & Paul McNicholas, 2014. "A LASSO-penalized BIC for mixture model selection," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 45-61, March.
    12. Zhang, Shucong & Zhou, Yong, 2018. "Variable screening for ultrahigh dimensional heterogeneous data via conditional quantile correlations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Luoying Yang & Tong Tong Wu, 2023. "Model‐based clustering of high‐dimensional longitudinal data via regularization," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 761-774, June.
    14. Chen-Wei Liu & Björn Andersson & Anders Skrondal, 2020. "A Constrained Metropolis–Hastings Robbins–Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 322-357, June.
    15. Hui Xiao & Yiguo Sun, 2019. "On Tuning Parameter Selection in Model Selection and Model Averaging: A Monte Carlo Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Mingli Chen & Kengo Kato & Chenlei Leng, 2021. "Analysis of networks via the sparse β‐model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 887-910, November.
    17. Motonori Oka & Kensuke Okada, 2023. "Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 302-331, March.
    18. Yuta Umezu & Yusuke Shimizu & Hiroki Masuda & Yoshiyuki Ninomiya, 2019. "AIC for the non-concave penalized likelihood method," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 247-274, April.
    19. Katayama, Shota & Imori, Shinpei, 2014. "Lasso penalized model selection criteria for high-dimensional multivariate linear regression analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 138-150.
    20. Shi, Zhentao & Huang, Jingyi, 2023. "Forward-selected panel data approach for program evaluation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 512-535.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:86:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11336-020-09742-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.