IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aistmt/v71y2019i2d10.1007_s10463-018-0649-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AIC for the non-concave penalized likelihood method

Author

Listed:
  • Yuta Umezu

    (Nagoya Institute of Technology)

  • Yusuke Shimizu

    (Josai University)

  • Hiroki Masuda

    (Kyushu University)

  • Yoshiyuki Ninomiya

    (Kyushu University)

Abstract

Non-concave penalized maximum likelihood methods are widely used because they are more efficient than the Lasso. They include a tuning parameter which controls a penalty level, and several information criteria have been developed for selecting it. While these criteria assure the model selection consistency, they have a problem in that there are no appropriate rules for choosing one from the class of information criteria satisfying such a preferred asymptotic property. In this paper, we derive an information criterion based on the original definition of the AIC by considering minimization of the prediction error rather than model selection consistency. Concretely speaking, we derive a function of the score statistic that is asymptotically equivalent to the non-concave penalized maximum likelihood estimator and then provide an estimator of the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the true distribution and the estimated distribution based on the function, whose bias converges in mean to zero.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuta Umezu & Yusuke Shimizu & Hiroki Masuda & Yoshiyuki Ninomiya, 2019. "AIC for the non-concave penalized likelihood method," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 247-274, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:71:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10463-018-0649-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10463-018-0649-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10463-018-0649-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10463-018-0649-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nakahiro Yoshida, 2011. "Polynomial type large deviation inequalities and quasi-likelihood analysis for stochastic differential equations," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(3), pages 431-479, June.
    2. R. T. Rockafellar, 1976. "Augmented Lagrangians and Applications of the Proximal Point Algorithm in Convex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 97-116, May.
    3. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    4. Hansheng Wang & Bo Li & Chenlei Leng, 2009. "Shrinkage tuning parameter selection with a diverging number of parameters," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 671-683, June.
    5. Yingying Fan & Cheng Yong Tang, 2013. "Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 531-552, June.
    6. Hansheng Wang & Runze Li & Chih-Ling Tsai, 2007. "Tuning parameter selectors for the smoothly clipped absolute deviation method," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(3), pages 553-568.
    7. Pollard, David, 1991. "Asymptotics for Least Absolute Deviation Regression Estimators," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 186-199, June.
    8. Zhang, Yiyun & Li, Runze & Tsai, Chih-Ling, 2010. "Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(489), pages 312-323.
    9. Mazumder, Rahul & Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor, 2011. "SparseNet: Coordinate Descent With Nonconvex Penalties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(495), pages 1125-1138.
    10. Ming Yuan & Yi Lin, 2007. "Model selection and estimation in the Gaussian graphical model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(1), pages 19-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nakahiro Yoshida, 2022. "Quasi-likelihood analysis and its applications," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 43-60, April.
    2. Simon Clinet, 2020. "Quasi-likelihood analysis for marked point processes and application to marked Hawkes processes," Papers 2001.11624, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    3. Simon Clinet, 2022. "Quasi-likelihood analysis for marked point processes and application to marked Hawkes processes," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 189-225, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eun Ryung Lee & Hohsuk Noh & Byeong U. Park, 2014. "Model Selection via Bayesian Information Criterion for Quantile Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 216-229, March.
    2. Fan, Rui & Lee, Ji Hyung & Shin, Youngki, 2023. "Predictive quantile regression with mixed roots and increasing dimensions: The ALQR approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    3. Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2017. "Regularized Latent Class Analysis with Application in Cognitive Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 660-692, September.
    4. Fei Jin & Lung-fei Lee, 2018. "Lasso Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Parametric Models with Singular Information Matrices," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Jin, Fei & Lee, Lung-fei, 2018. "Irregular N2SLS and LASSO estimation of the matrix exponential spatial specification model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 336-358.
    6. Ping Zeng & Yongyue Wei & Yang Zhao & Jin Liu & Liya Liu & Ruyang Zhang & Jianwei Gou & Shuiping Huang & Feng Chen, 2014. "Variable selection approach for zero-inflated count data via adaptive lasso," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 879-894, April.
    7. Hirose, Kei & Tateishi, Shohei & Konishi, Sadanori, 2013. "Tuning parameter selection in sparse regression modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 28-40.
    8. Katayama, Shota & Imori, Shinpei, 2014. "Lasso penalized model selection criteria for high-dimensional multivariate linear regression analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 138-150.
    9. Kaixu Yang & Tapabrata Maiti, 2022. "Ultrahigh‐dimensional generalized additive model: Unified theory and methods," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 917-942, September.
    10. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou & Liu, Jingchen & Ying, Zhiliang, 2017. "Regularized latent class analysis with application in cognitive diagnosis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103182, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Eduardo F. Mendes & Gabriel J. P. Pinto, 2023. "Generalized Information Criteria for Structured Sparse Models," Papers 2309.01764, arXiv.org.
    12. Yingying Fan & Cheng Yong Tang, 2013. "Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 531-552, June.
    13. Gaorong Li & Liugen Xue & Heng Lian, 2012. "SCAD-penalised generalised additive models with non-polynomial dimensionality," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 681-697.
    14. Caner, Mehmet & Fan, Qingliang, 2015. "Hybrid generalized empirical likelihood estimators: Instrument selection with adaptive lasso," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 256-274.
    15. Guang Cheng & Hao Zhang & Zuofeng Shang, 2015. "Sparse and efficient estimation for partial spline models with increasing dimension," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(1), pages 93-127, February.
    16. Joel L. Horowitz & Lars Nesheim, 2018. "Using penalized likelihood to select parameters in a random coefficients multinomial logit model," CeMMAP working papers CWP29/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    17. Sakyajit Bhattacharya & Paul McNicholas, 2014. "A LASSO-penalized BIC for mixture model selection," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 45-61, March.
    18. Dengke Xu & Zhongzhan Zhang & Liucang Wu, 2014. "Variable selection in high-dimensional double generalized linear models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 327-347, May.
    19. Ling Zhou & Huazhen Lin & Xinyuan Song & Yi Li, 2014. "Selection of Latent Variables for Multiple Mixed-outcome Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1064-1082, December.
    20. Xin Cheng & Wenbin Lu & Mengling Liu, 2015. "Identification of homogeneous and heterogeneous variables in pooled cohort studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 397-403, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:71:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10463-018-0649-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.