IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v55y1990i1p19-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The robustness of the usual correction for restriction in range due to explicit selection

Author

Listed:
  • D. Holmes

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Holmes, 1990. "The robustness of the usual correction for restriction in range due to explicit selection," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 19-32, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:55:y:1990:i:1:p:19-32
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02294740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02294740
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02294740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven Andrew Culpepper, 2016. "Revisiting the 4-Parameter Item Response Model: Bayesian Estimation and Application," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1142-1163, December.
    2. Steven Culpepper, 2012. "Using the Criterion-Predictor Factor Model to Compute the Probability of Detecting Prediction Bias with Ordinary Least Squares Regression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 561-580, July.
    3. Elaine Zanutto & Eric Bradlow, 2006. "Data pruning in consumer choice models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 267-287, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:55:y:1990:i:1:p:19-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.