IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v44y1979i1p93-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between external variables and common factors

Author

Listed:
  • James Steiger

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • James Steiger, 1979. "The relationship between external variables and common factors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 44(1), pages 93-97, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:44:y:1979:i:1:p:93-97
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02293788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02293788
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02293788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanley Mulaik & Roderick McDonald, 1978. "The effect of additional variables on factor indeterminacy in models with a single common factor," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(2), pages 177-192, June.
    2. Peter Schönemann & Ming-Mei Wang, 1972. "Some new results on factor indeterminacy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 61-91, March.
    3. Roderick McDonald, 1974. "The measurement of factor indeterminacy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(2), pages 203-222, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niels G. Waller, 2023. "Breaking Our Silence on Factor Score Indeterminacy," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(2), pages 244-261, April.
    2. Edward E. Rigdon & Jan-Michael Becker & Marko Sarstedt, 2019. "Parceling Cannot Reduce Factor Indeterminacy in Factor Analysis: A Research Note," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 772-780, September.
    3. Désiré Avom & Chrysost Bangaké & Hermann Ndoya, 2021. "Measuring financial inclusion in African countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 848-866.
    4. Rigdon, Edward E., 2016. "Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 598-605.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wim Krijnen, 2002. "On the construction of all factors of the model for factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 161-172, March.
    2. Niels G. Waller, 2023. "Breaking Our Silence on Factor Score Indeterminacy," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(2), pages 244-261, April.
    3. Roderick McDonald, 1986. "Describing the elephant: Structure and function in multivariate data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 513-534, December.
    4. Wim Krijnen & Theo Dijkstra & Richard Gill, 1998. "Conditions for factor (in)determinacy in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 359-367, December.
    5. Dennis Cook, R. & Forzani, Liliana, 2023. "On the role of partial least squares in path analysis for the social sciences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Willem E. Saris & Marius de Pijper & Jan Mulder, 1978. "Optimal Procedures for Estimation of Factor Scores," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 7(1), pages 85-106, August.
    7. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    8. Wayne Velicer, 1976. "Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(3), pages 321-327, September.
    9. Roderick McDonald, 1974. "The measurement of factor indeterminacy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(2), pages 203-222, June.
    10. Frank Baker & Roderick McDonald, 1996. "Reviews," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 697-703, December.
    11. Raymond Hubbard & Stuart J. Allen, 1987. "A Cautionary Note on the Use of Principal Components Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 16(2), pages 301-308, November.
    12. Stegeman, Alwin, 2016. "A new method for simultaneous estimation of the factor model parameters, factor scores, and unique parts," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 189-203.
    13. Stanley Mulaik & Roderick McDonald, 1978. "The effect of additional variables on factor indeterminacy in models with a single common factor," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(2), pages 177-192, June.
    14. K. Haagen & W. Oberhofer, 1999. "The replicated common factor-analysis model," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3-4), pages 35-45.
    15. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Ringle, Christian M. & Thiele, Kai O. & Gudergan, Siegfried P., 2016. "Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3998-4010.
    16. James Williams, 1978. "A definition for the common-factor analysis model and the elimination of problems of factor score indeterminacy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 293-306, September.
    17. Bert Green, 1976. "On the factor score controversy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(2), pages 263-266, June.
    18. James Steiger, 1979. "Factor indeterminacy in the 1930's and the 1970's some interesting parallels," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 44(2), pages 157-167, June.
    19. William Strout, 1990. "A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 293-325, June.
    20. Jules Ellis & Brian Junker, 1997. "Tail-measurability in monotone latent variable models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 495-523, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:44:y:1979:i:1:p:93-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.