IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v26y1961i4p347-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient

Author

Listed:
  • John Carroll

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • John Carroll, 1961. "The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 26(4), pages 347-372, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:26:y:1961:i:4:p:347-372
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02289768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02289768
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02289768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Carroll, 1945. "The effect of difficulty and chance success on correlations between items or between tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. George Ferguson, 1941. "The factorial interpretation of test difficulty," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 6(5), pages 323-329, October.
    3. J. Guilford, 1941. "The difficulty of a test and its factor composition," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 6(2), pages 67-77, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bengt O. Muthã‰N, 1989. "Dichotomous Factor Analysis of Symptom Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 18(1), pages 19-65, August.
    2. Wolfgang Messner, 2021. "Empirically assessing noisy necessary conditions with activation functions," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Florian Schuberth & Jörg Henseler & Theo K. Dijkstra, 2018. "Partial least squares path modeling using ordinal categorical indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 9-35, January.
    4. Ivan Mervielde, 1977. "Methodological problems of research about attitude-behavior consistency," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 259-281, September.
    5. Jansen, Nora & Hinz, Oliver & Deusser, Clemens & Strufe, Thorsten, 2021. "Is the Buzz on? – A Buzz Detection System for Viral Posts in Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-17.
    6. Keith Hope, 1980. "A geometrical approach to sociological analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 309-325, March.
    7. repec:ers:journl:v:x:y:2007:i:3-4:p:89-98 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Zvi Maimon & Adi Raveh & Gur Mosheiov, 1986. "Additional cautionary notes about the Pearson's correlation coefficient," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 313-325, December.
    9. Daniela-Emanuela Danacica, 2017. "Methodological and Applicative Problems of using Pearson Correlation Coefficient in the Analysis of Socio-Economic Variables," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(2), pages 148-163, February.
    10. Bailey K. Fosdick & Adrian E. Raftery, 2012. "Estimating the Correlation in Bivariate Normal Data With Known Variances and Small Sample Sizes," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(1), pages 34-41, February.
    11. Anne Pignault & Emilie Vayre & Claude Houssemand, 2022. "What Do They Want from a Career? University Students’ Future Career Expectations and Resources in a Health Crisis Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karl Schweizer & Siegbert Reiß, 2019. "On the Contextual Conditions Driving a Difficulty Factor," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Harold Gulliksen, 1945. "The relation of item difficulty and inter-item correlation to test variance and reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 10(2), pages 79-91, June.
    3. Stephen Schilling & R. Bock, 2005. "High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 533-555, September.
    4. W. Gibson, 1960. "Nonlinear factors in two dimensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 25(4), pages 381-392, December.
    5. Paul Horst, 1954. "The maximum expected correlation between two multiple-choice tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(4), pages 291-296, December.
    6. Jake Olivier & Melanie L Bell, 2013. "Effect Sizes for 2×2 Contingency Tables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-7, March.
    7. Robert MacCann, 2004. "Reliability as a function of the number of item options derived from the “knowledge or random guessing” model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 147-157, March.
    8. Lynnette Plumlee, 1954. "The predicted and observed effect of chance success on multiple-choice test validity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(1), pages 65-70, March.
    9. W. Gibson, 1967. "A latent structure for the simplex," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(1), pages 35-46, March.
    10. Lynnette Plumlee, 1952. "The effect of difficulty and chance success on item-test correlation and on test reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 17(1), pages 69-86, March.
    11. Hössjer, Ola & Sjölander, Arvid, 2022. "Sharp lower and upper bounds for the covariance of bounded random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Morgane Innocent & Julie Lassalle & Adélaïde Amelot, 2016. "Livrable L7.1_2 : Résultats de l’étude quantitative avant lancement des dispositifs dite étude n° 1 du projet SOLENN," Working Papers hal-02016473, HAL.
    13. Hubert Brogden, 1946. "Variation in test validity with variation in the distribution of item difficulties, number of items, and degree of their intercorrelation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 197-214, December.
    14. Bengt O. Muthã‰N, 1989. "Dichotomous Factor Analysis of Symptom Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 18(1), pages 19-65, August.
    15. W. Gibson, 1959. "Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 24(3), pages 229-252, September.
    16. John Cotton & Donald Campbell & R. Malone, 1957. "The relationship between factorial composition of test items and measures of test reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 22(4), pages 347-357, December.
    17. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    18. David J. Bartholomew & Ian J. Deary & Martin Lawn, 2009. "Sir Godfrey Thomson: a statistical pioneer," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(2), pages 467-482, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:26:y:1961:i:4:p:347-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.