IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v5y2012i1p57-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burden of a Multiple Sclerosis Relapse

Author

Listed:
  • MerriKay Oleen-Burkey
  • Jane Castelli-Haley
  • Maureen Lage
  • Kenneth Johnson

Abstract

Background: Relapses are a common feature of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and increasing severity has been shown to be associated with higher healthcare costs, and to result in transient increases in disability. Increasing disability likely impacts work and leisure productivity, and lowers quality of life. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize from the patient’s perspective the impact of a multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse in terms of the economic cost, work and leisure productivity, functional ability, and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), for a sample of patients with RRMS in the US treated with immunomodulatory agents. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based, self-report survey was conducted among members of MSWatch.com, a patient support website now known as Copaxone.com. Qualified respondents in the US had been diagnosed with RRMS and were using an immunomodulatory agent. The survey captured costs of RRMS with questions about healthcare resource utilization, use of community services, and purchased alterations and assistive items related to MS. The Work and Leisure Impairment instrument and the EQ-5D were used to measure productivity losses and HR-QOL (health utility), respectively. The Goodin MS neurological impairment questionnaire was used to measure functional disability; questions were added about relapses in the past year. Results: Of 711 qualified respondents, 67% reported having at least one relapse during the last year, with a mean of 2.2 ± 2.3 relapses/year. Respondents who experienced at least one relapse had significantly higher mean annual direct and indirect costs compared with those who did not experience a relapse ($US38 458 vs $US28 669; p=0.0004) [year 2009 values]. Direct health-related costs accounted for the majority of the increased cost ($US5201; 53%) and were mainly due to increases in hospitalizations, medications, and ambulatory care. Indirect costs, including informal care and productivity loss, accounted for the additional 47% of increased cost ($US4588). Accounting for the mean number of relapses associated with these increased costs, the total economic cost of one relapse episode could be estimated at about $US4449, exclusive of intangible costs. The mean self-reported Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, derived from the Goodin MS questionnaire, was significantly higher with relapse than with a clinically stable state (EDSS 4.3 vs 3.7; p>0.0001), while the mean health utility score was significantly lower with relapse compared with a clinically stable state (0.66 vs 0.75; p=0.0001). The value of these intangible costs of relapse can be estimated at $US5400. The overall burden (direct, indirect, and intangible costs) of one relapse in patients treated with immunomodulatory agents is therefore estimated conservatively at $US9849. Conclusions: This study shows that from a patient’s perspective an MS relapse is associated with a significant increase in the economic costs as well as a decline in HR-QOL and functional ability. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2012

Suggested Citation

  • MerriKay Oleen-Burkey & Jane Castelli-Haley & Maureen Lage & Kenneth Johnson, 2012. "Burden of a Multiple Sclerosis Relapse," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 5(1), pages 57-69, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:5:y:2012:i:1:p:57-69
    DOI: 10.2165/11592160-000000000-00000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/11592160-000000000-00000
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/11592160-000000000-00000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & P. Lindgren & J. Kerrigan & N. Russell & R. Nixon, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 96-104, July.
    2. Kobelt, Gisela & Lindgren, Peter & Parkin, David & Francis, David A. & Johnson, Michael & Bates, David & Jönsson, Bengt, 2000. "Costs and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis. A Cross-Sectional Observational Study in the UK," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 398, Stockholm School of Economics.
    3. Paul Dolan & Claire Gudex & Paul Kind & Alan Williams, 1995. "A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey," Working Papers 138chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olivia Ernstsson & Hanna Gyllensten & Kristina Alexanderson & Petter Tinghög & Emilie Friberg & Anders Norlund, 2016. "Cost of Illness of Multiple Sclerosis - A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    2. Pamela K. Newland & Louise H. Flick & Florian P. Thomas & William D. Shannon, 2014. "Identifying Symptom Co-Occurrence in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 23(5), pages 529-543, October.
    3. A. J. Hawton & C. Green, 2016. "Multiple sclerosis: relapses, resource use, and costs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(7), pages 875-884, September.
    4. Pamela K. Newland & Rebecca Lorenz & Chakra Budhathoki & Mark P. Jensen, 2016. "The Presence of Symptoms With Comorbid Conditions in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(5), pages 532-548, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gisela Kobelt & J. Berg & P. Lindgren & G. Izquierdo & O. Sánchez-Soliño & J. Pérez-Miranda & M. Casado, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Spain," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 65-74, July.
    2. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & Peter Lindgren & M. Battaglia & C. Lucioni & A. Uccelli, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Italy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 45-54, July.
    3. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & P. Lindgren & J. Kerrigan & N. Russell & R. Nixon, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(02), pages 96-104, July.
    4. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & Peter Lindgren & Carlotta Plesnilla & Ulf Baumhackl & Thomas Berger & Harald Kolleger & Karl Vass, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Austria," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 14-23, July.
    5. Gisela Kobelt & Jenny Berg & Peter Lindgren & W. Elias & P. Flachenecker & M. Freidel & N. König & V. Limmroth & E. Straube, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 34-44, July.
    6. Gisela Kobelt & J. Berg & P. Lindgren, 2006. "Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis in The Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(02), pages 55-64, July.
    7. Yahya H Almohmeed & Alison Avenell & Lorna Aucott & Mark A Vickers, 2013. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Sero-Epidemiological Association between Epstein Barr Virus and Multiple Sclerosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Emma McIntosh, 2006. "Using Discrete Choice Experiments within a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 855-868, September.
    9. Lieven Annemans & Mélanie Brignone & Sylvain Druais & Ann Pauw & Aline Gauthier & Koen Demyttenaere, 2014. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmaceutical Treatment Options in the First-Line Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Belgium," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 479-493, May.
    10. José Nunes, 1998. "Economic evaluation of rehabilitation: The quality of life approach using EuroQol," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 4(2), pages 192-201, May.
    11. Brazier, John & Roberts, Jennifer & Deverill, Mark, 2002. "The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 271-292, March.
    12. Trudy Owens & Nikos Evangelou & David Whynes, 2013. "Rationing and deprivation: disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(2), pages 315-321, April.
    13. Lena Lundberg & Magnus Johannesson & Dag G.L. Isacson & Lars Borgquist, 1999. "The Relationship between Health-state Utilities and the SF-12 in a General Population," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(2), pages 128-140, April.
    14. Annie Hawton & James Shearer & Elizabeth Goodwin & Colin Green, 2013. "Squinting Through Layers of Fog: Assessing the Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 331-341, August.
    15. Garry Barton & Tracey Sach & Michael Doherty & Anthony Avery & Claire Jenkinson & Kenneth Muir, 2008. "An assessment of the discriminative ability of the EQ-5D index , SF-6D, and EQ VAS, using sociodemographic factors and clinical conditions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 9(3), pages 237-249, August.
    16. Dennis Petrie & Chris Doran & Anthony Shakeshaft & Rob Sanson-Fisher, 2007. "The relationship between alcohol consumption and self-reported health status using the EQ5D," Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 204, Economic Studies, University of Dundee.
    17. Nick Bansback & Huiying Sun & Daphne P. Guh & Xin Li & Bohdan Nosyk & Susan Griffin & Paul G. Barnett & Aslam H. Anis, 2008. "Impact of the recall period on measuring health utilities for acute events," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(12), pages 1413-1419, December.
    18. N J Devlin & P Hansen & P Kind & A H Williams, 2000. "The health state preferences and logistical inconsistencies of New Zealanders: a tale of two tariffs," Working Papers 180chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    19. Jenny Berg & P. Lindgren & Sten Fredrikson & Gisela Kobelt, 2006. "Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Sweden," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(02), pages 75-85, July.
    20. Gisela Kobelt, 2006. "Costs and quality of life for patients with multiple sclerosis in Belgium," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 7(2), pages 24-33, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:5:y:2012:i:1:p:57-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.