IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v2y2009i2p77-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact on Patient Health Outcomes of Interventions Targeting the Patient-Physician Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Auerbach

Abstract

Over the past 3–4 decades, numerous studies have been published evaluating interventions targeted at healthcare providers, at patients, or at both patients and healthcare providers, which are designed to, in some fashion, improve the provider-patient relationship and thereby enhance patient health outcomes. This article synthesizes findings from 14 literature reviews of relevant studies published between 1991 and 2007. Findings indicate that interventions aimed at physicians and other providers have consistently produced positive effects on provider communication behaviors and interpersonal skills. However, only moderately positive effects on patient satisfaction, and limited impact on patient healthcare behaviors such as compliance, appointment adherence, and resource use were found. Effects on primary medical outcomes were minimal although some positive effects on secondary medical outcomes such as quality of life were obtained. Patient-targeted interventions also showed consistently positive effects on patient-physician communication in addition to enhanced patient participation in decision making. Effects on patient primary medical outcomes were limited, and weak effects on patient satisfaction were obtained. Characteristics of studies and training programs that may have influenced outcomes are discussed, as are practical impediments to promoting better physician-patient communication in clinical practice. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Auerbach, 2009. "The Impact on Patient Health Outcomes of Interventions Targeting the Patient-Physician Relationship," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 2(2), pages 77-84, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:2:y:2009:i:2:p:77-84
    DOI: 10.2165/01312067-200902020-00003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2165/01312067-200902020-00003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2165/01312067-200902020-00003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annette M. O'Connor & Dawn Stacey & Michael J. Barry & Nananda F. Col & Karen B. Eden & Vikki Entwistle & Valerie Fiset & Margaret Holmes-Rovner & Sara Khangura & Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas & David R. Ro, 2007. "Do Patient Decision Aids Meet Effectiveness Criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 27(5), pages 554-574, September.
    2. Kiesler, Donald J. & Auerbach, Stephen M., 2003. "Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician-patient interaction: the interpersonal circumplex," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 1707-1722, November.
    3. Edward Krupat, 2006. "Patient-Physician Fit: An Idea Whose Time Has Come," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 26(2), pages 110-111, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angela Fagerlin & Karen R. Sepucha & Mick P. Couper & Carrie A. Levin & Eleanor Singer & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2010. "Patients’ Knowledge about 9 Common Health Conditions: The DECISIONS Survey," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 35-52, September.
    2. Lyndal Trevena, 2021. "Commentary on History of IPDAS," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(7), pages 734-735, October.
    3. France Légaré & Stéphane Turcotte & Dawn Stacey & Stéphane Ratté & Jennifer Kryworuchko & Ian Graham, 2012. "Patients’ Perceptions of Sharing in Decisions," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Sergey Motorny & Surendra Sarnikar & Cherie Noteboom, 2022. "Design of an Intelligent Patient Decision aid Based on Individual Decision-Making Styles and Information Need Preferences," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1249-1264, August.
    5. Mary Ersek & Justine S. Sefcik & Feng-Chang Lin & Tae Joon Lee & Robin Gilliam & Laura C. Hanson, 2014. "Provider Staffing Effect on a Decision Aid Intervention," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 36-53, February.
    6. Malcom Hopwood, 2020. "The Shared Decision-Making Process in the Pharmacological Management of Depression," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(1), pages 23-30, February.
    7. Syahrir Zaini & Harvin Anbu Manivanna Bharathy & Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman & Jesjeet Singh Gill & Koh Ong Hui & Hasniza Zaman Huri & Siti Hadijah Shamsudin & Ng Chong Guan, 2018. "Development of a Strategic Tool for Shared Decision-Making in the Use of Antidepressants among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Focus Group Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Cousin, Gaëtan & Schmid Mast, Marianne & Jaunin-Stalder, Nicole, 2013. "Finding the right interactional temperature: Do colder patients need more warmth in physician communication style?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 18-23.
    9. Christopher E. Knoepke & Erin L. Chaussee & Daniel D. Matlock & Jocelyn S. Thompson & Colleen K. McIlvennan & Amrut V. Ambardekar & Elisabeth M. Schaffer & Prateeti Khazanie & Laura Scherer & Robert M, 2022. "Changes over Time in Patient Stated Values and Treatment Preferences Regarding Aggressive Therapies: Insights from the DECIDE-LVAD Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(3), pages 404-414, April.
    10. Meeuwesen, Ludwien & Harmsen, Johannes A.M. & Bernsen, Roos M.D. & Bruijnzeels, Marc A., 2006. "Do Dutch doctors communicate differently with immigrant patients than with Dutch patients?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2407-2417, November.
    11. Moumjid, Nora & Charles, Cathy & Morelle, Magali & Gafni, Amiram & Brémond, Alain & Farsi, Fadila & Whelan, Tim & Carrère, Marie-Odile, 2009. "The statutory duty of physicians to inform patients versus unmet patients' information needs: The case of breast cancer in France," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 162-173, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:2:y:2009:i:2:p:77-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.