IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v53y2016i4d10.1007_s12597-016-0257-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and evaluation of layout alternatives to enhance the performance of industry

Author

Listed:
  • Parveen Sharma

    (National Institute of Technology)

  • Sandeep Singhal

    (National Institute of Technology)

Abstract

The present study provides an alternative way to handle the industrial layout problems. A procedural approach has been proposed by the authors to design the layout. The suggested approach consists of few easy and quite simpler steps. It only requires to apply predetermined steps consisting some simple mathematical calculation. An industrial layout problem has been resolved by adopting the suggested approach. The developed layout alternatives of the considered case study have been simulated with the ProModel tool for the evaluation purpose. The ranking of the alternatives has been carried out by the preference selection index (PSI) methodology. The output of the analysis demonstrated that the layout alternative designed by the suggested approach ranked higher as compared to the existing layout. A comparison of the proposed approach has also been carried out with the other approach from the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Parveen Sharma & Sandeep Singhal, 2016. "Design and evaluation of layout alternatives to enhance the performance of industry," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 741-760, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:53:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s12597-016-0257-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-016-0257-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-016-0257-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-016-0257-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Lie Chien & Sharp, Gunter P., 1999. "Application of the integrated framework for the plant layout evaluation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 118-138, July.
    2. Gordon C. Armour & Elwood S. Buffa, 1963. "A Heuristic Algorithm and Simulation Approach to Relative Location of Facilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 294-309, January.
    3. Kothari, Ravi & Ghosh, Diptesh, 2011. "The Single Row Facility Layout Problem: State of the Art," IIMA Working Papers WP2011-12-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    4. Frederick S. Hillier & Michael M. Connors, 1966. "Quadratic Assignment Problem Algorithms and the Location of Indivisible Facilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 42-57, September.
    5. Meir J. Rosenblatt, 1986. "The Dynamics of Plant Layout," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 76-86, January.
    6. S. Altuntas & T. Dereli & H. Selim, 2013. "Fuzzy weighted association rule based solution approaches to facility layout problem in cellular manufacturing system," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 253-271.
    7. Yang, Taho & Kuo, Chunwei, 2003. "A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 128-136, May.
    8. Matai, Rajesh, 2015. "Solving multi objective facility layout problem by modified simulated annealing," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 261(C), pages 302-311.
    9. Palubeckis, Gintaras, 2015. "Fast local search for single row facility layout," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 800-814.
    10. Kajal Chatterjee & Samarjit Kar, 2016. "Multi-criteria analysis of supply chain risk management using interval valued fuzzy TOPSIS," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(3), pages 474-499, September.
    11. K.D. Maniya & M.G. Bhatt, 2011. "The selection of flexible manufacturing system using preference selection index method," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 330-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bolte, Andreas & Thonemann, Ulrich Wilhelm, 1996. "Optimizing simulated annealing schedules with genetic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 402-416, July.
    2. Zhongwei Zhang & Lihui Wu & Zhaoyun Wu & Wenqiang Zhang & Shun Jia & Tao Peng, 2022. "Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Kazuhiro Tsuchiya & Sunil Bharitkar & Yoshiyasu Takefuji, 1996. "A neural network approach to facility layout problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 556-563, March.
    4. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Cheng, Chun Hung & Conway, Daniel G. & Lau, Chun Ming, 2003. "A hybrid genetic algorithm for the dynamic plant layout problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 107-120, November.
    5. Yu, Junfang & Sarker, Bhaba R., 2003. "Directional decomposition heuristic for a linear machine-cell location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 142-184, August.
    6. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafal Michalski, 2016. "A concept of a flexible approach to the facilities layout problems in logistics systems," WORking papers in Management Science (WORMS) WORMS/16/11, Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    7. Bock, Stefan & Hoberg, Kai, 2007. "Detailed layout planning for irregularly-shaped machines with transportation path design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 693-718, March.
    8. Parveen Sharma & Sandeep Singhal, 2017. "Analysis of facility layout alternatives using proposed integrated approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(1), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Stefan Helber & Daniel Böhme & Farid Oucherif & Svenja Lagershausen & Steffen Kasper, 2016. "A hierarchical facility layout planning approach for large and complex hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-29, June.
    10. Ravi Kumar, K. & Hadjinicola, George C. & Lin, Ting-li, 1995. "A heuristic procedure for the single-row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 65-73, November.
    11. Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Chiang, Chi, 1998. "Intelligent local search strategies for solving facility layout problems with the quadratic assignment problem formulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 457-488, April.
    12. Li, Wu-Ji & Smith, J. MacGregor, 1995. "An algorithm for Quadratic Assignment Problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 205-216, February.
    13. Gintaras Palubeckis & Armantas Ostreika & Jūratė Platužienė, 2022. "A Variable Neighborhood Search Approach for the Dynamic Single Row Facility Layout Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Loiola, Eliane Maria & de Abreu, Nair Maria Maia & Boaventura-Netto, Paulo Oswaldo & Hahn, Peter & Querido, Tania, 2007. "A survey for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 657-690, January.
    15. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Cheng, Chun Hung, 1998. "Dynamic layout algorithms: a state-of-the-art survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 507-521, August.
    16. Ali Derakhshan Asl & Kuan Yew Wong, 2017. "Solving unequal-area static and dynamic facility layout problems using modified particle swarm optimization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1317-1336, August.
    17. Xie, Yue & Zhou, Shenghan & Xiao, Yiyong & Kulturel-Konak, Sadan & Konak, Abdullah, 2018. "A β-accurate linearization method of Euclidean distance for the facility layout problem with heterogeneous distance metrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 26-38.
    18. Balakrishnan, Jaydeep & Hung Cheng, Chun, 2009. "The dynamic plant layout problem: Incorporating rolling horizons and forecast uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 165-177, February.
    19. Akash Tayal & Angappa Gunasekaran & Surya Prakash Singh & Rameshwar Dubey & Thanos Papadopoulos, 2017. "Formulating and solving sustainable stochastic dynamic facility layout problem: a key to sustainable operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 621-655, June.
    20. Rui Li & Yali Chen & Jinzhao Song & Ming Li & Yu Yu, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization Method of Industrial Workshop Layout from the Perspective of Low Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:53:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s12597-016-0257-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.