IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metron/v76y2018i3d10.1007_s40300-018-0146-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of small area counts with the benchmarking property

Author

Listed:
  • M. Giovanna Ranalli

    (Universitá degli Studi di Perugia)

  • Giorgio E. Montanari

    (Universitá degli Studi di Perugia)

  • Cecilia Vicarelli

    (Direzione Centrale per le Statistiche Congiunturali, ISTAT
    Direzione Centrale per la Contabilita’ Nazionale)

Abstract

Estimation of small area totals makes use of auxiliary variables to borrow strength from related areas through a model. Precision of final small area estimates depends on the validity of such a model. To protect against possible model failures, benchmarking procedures make the sum of small area estimates match a design consistent estimate of the total of a larger area. This is also particularly important for national institutes of statistics to ensure coherence between small area estimates and direct estimates produced at higher level planned domains. In this paper we propose a self-benchmarked estimator of small area totals which is based on a unit level logistic mixed model for a binary response. In particular, we use a plug-in approach and add a constraint to the maximum penalized quasi-likelihood (PQL) procedure considered in Saei and Chambers (Working paper M03/15, Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute. University of Southampton, 2003) to accommodate benchmarking. An analytic estimator for the mean squared error of the final small area estimator is also proposed following the ad-hoc procedure proposed by González-Manteiga et al. (Comput Stat Data Anal 51:2720–2733, 2007). We then compare the performance of the proposed benchmarked estimator with several competing estimators through a set of simulation studies.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Giovanna Ranalli & Giorgio E. Montanari & Cecilia Vicarelli, 2018. "Estimation of small area counts with the benchmarking property," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 76(3), pages 349-378, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:76:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s40300-018-0146-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s40300-018-0146-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40300-018-0146-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40300-018-0146-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh & Anders Skrondal, 2006. "Multilevel modelling of complex survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(4), pages 805-827, October.
    2. G. Datta & M. Ghosh & R. Steorts & J. Maples, 2011. "Bayesian benchmarking with applications to small area estimation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(3), pages 574-588, November.
    3. Gonzalez-Manteiga, W. & Lombardia, M.J. & Molina, I. & Morales, D. & Santamaria, L., 2007. "Estimation of the mean squared error of predictors of small area linear parameters under a logistic mixed model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 2720-2733, February.
    4. Jiming Jiang & P. Lahiri, 2006. "Mixed model prediction and small area estimation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(1), pages 1-96, June.
    5. Edward L. Korn & Barry I. Graubard, 2003. "Estimating variance components by using survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 175-190, February.
    6. Isabel Molina & Ayoub Saei & M. José Lombardía, 2007. "Small area estimates of labour force participation under a multinomial logit mixed model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(4), pages 975-1000, October.
    7. A. F. Militino & M. D. Ugarte & T. Goicoa, 2015. "Deriving small area estimates from information technology business surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 178(4), pages 1051-1067, October.
    8. Miguel Boubeta & María José Lombardía & Domingo Morales, 2016. "Empirical best prediction under area-level Poisson mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 548-569, September.
    9. Pfeffermann, Danny & Barnard, Charles H, 1991. "Some New Estimators for Small-Area Means with Application to the Assessment of Farmland Values," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 9(1), pages 73-84, January.
    10. M. Ugarte & A. Militino & T. Goicoa, 2009. "Benchmarked estimates in small areas using linear mixed models with restrictions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(2), pages 342-364, August.
    11. Malay Ghosh & Rebecca Steorts, 2013. "Two-stage benchmarking as applied to small area estimation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(4), pages 670-687, November.
    12. Jiming Jiang & P. Lahiri, 2001. "Empirical Best Prediction for Small Area Inference with Binary Data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(2), pages 217-243, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang Junni L. & Bryant John, 2020. "Fully Bayesian Benchmarking of Small Area Estimation Models," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(1), pages 197-223, March.
    2. Joscha Krause & Jan Pablo Burgard & Domingo Morales, 2022. "$$\ell _2$$ ℓ 2 -penalized approximate likelihood inference in logit mixed models for regional prevalence estimation under covariate rank-deficiency," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 459-489, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joscha Krause & Jan Pablo Burgard & Domingo Morales, 2022. "$$\ell _2$$ ℓ 2 -penalized approximate likelihood inference in logit mixed models for regional prevalence estimation under covariate rank-deficiency," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 459-489, May.
    2. Angelo Moretti, 2023. "Estimation of small area proportions under a bivariate logistic mixed model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3663-3684, August.
    3. Elaheh Torkashvand & Mohammad Jafari Jozani & Mahmoud Torabi, 2016. "Constrained Bayes estimation in small area models with functional measurement error," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(4), pages 710-730, December.
    4. Boubeta, Miguel & Lombardía, María José & Morales, Domingo, 2017. "Poisson mixed models for studying the poverty in small areas," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 32-47.
    5. Tomáš Hobza & Domingo Morales & Laureano Santamaría, 2018. "Small area estimation of poverty proportions under unit-level temporal binomial-logit mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(2), pages 270-294, June.
    6. Malay Ghosh, 2020. "Small area estimation: its evolution in five decades," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Chandra, Hukum & Salvati, Nicola & Chambers, Ray, 2018. "Small area estimation under a spatially non-linear model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 19-38.
    8. Marius Stefan & Michael Hidiroglou, 2021. "Benchmarked Estimators for a Small Area Mean Under a Onefold Nested Regression Model," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 108-131, April.
    9. Ghosh Malay, 2020. "Small area estimation: its evolution in five decades," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Danny Pfeffermann & Anna Sikov & Richard Tiller, 2014. "Single- and two-stage cross-sectional and time series benchmarking procedures for small area estimation," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(4), pages 631-666, December.
    11. Malay Ghosh & Tatsuya Kubokawa & Yuki Kawakubo, 2014. "Benchmarked Empirical Bayes Methods in Multiplicative Area-level Models with Risk Evaluation," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-918, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    12. María Dolores Esteban & María José Lombardía & Esther López-Vizcaíno & Domingo Morales & Agustín Pérez, 2020. "Small area estimation of proportions under area-level compositional mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(3), pages 793-818, September.
    13. Miguel Boubeta & María José Lombardía & Domingo Morales, 2016. "Empirical best prediction under area-level Poisson mixed models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 548-569, September.
    14. Militino, A.F. & Goicoa, T. & Ugarte, M.D., 2012. "Estimating the percentage of food expenditure in small areas using bias-corrected P-spline based estimators," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(10), pages 2934-2948.
    15. M. D. Ugarte & A. F. Militino & T. Goicoa, 2008. "Adjusting economic estimates in business surveys," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(11), pages 1253-1265.
    16. María Dolores Esteban & María José Lombardía & Esther López‐Vizcaíno & Domingo Morales & Agustín Pérez, 2022. "Empirical best prediction of small area bivariate parameters," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1699-1727, December.
    17. Ryan Janicki & Andrew Vesper, 2017. "Benchmarking techniques for reconciling Bayesian small area models at distinct geographic levels," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(4), pages 557-581, November.
    18. Merfeld,Joshua David & Newhouse,David Locke & Weber,Michael & Lahiri,Partha, 2022. "Combining Survey and Geospatial Data Can Significantly Improve Gender-DisaggregatedEstimates of Labor Market Outcomes," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10077, The World Bank.
    19. Zhang Junni L. & Bryant John, 2020. "Fully Bayesian Benchmarking of Small Area Estimation Models," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(1), pages 197-223, March.
    20. Isabel Molina & Ewa Strzalkowska‐Kominiak, 2020. "Estimation of proportions in small areas: application to the labour force using the Swiss Census Structural Survey," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 281-310, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:76:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s40300-018-0146-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.