IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v22y2011i2p161-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of XBRL adoption in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Felden

Abstract

The distribution of the eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) is globally driven by the growing information needs of stakeholders in and around enterprises and by the mandatory reporting requirements of public entities. The aim of this paper is to show the adoption level and the impact parameters of the adoption of the XBRL standard in Germany and to compare it with the adoption of other information and communication standards. In order to gain knowledge and an understanding of this topic, managers from different business units used a survey based on institutional theory and the technology acceptance model. The results are discussed in terms of the lessons learned in the context of diffusion research. It is shown that the influence of social groups and top management leadership determine the level of XBRL adoption. The positive arguments for XBRL seem to be underrepresented or provide insufficient reasons for adoption. Comparisons with the adoption of other information and communication standards show differences in the parameters which influence adoption. Copyright Springer Verlag 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Felden, 2011. "Characteristics of XBRL adoption in Germany," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 161-186, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:22:y:2011:i:2:p:161-186
    DOI: 10.1007/s00187-011-0134-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00187-011-0134-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00187-011-0134-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josh Lerner & Jean Tirole, 2005. "The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(2), pages 99-120, Spring.
    2. Bonsón, E. & Cortijo, V. & Escobar, T., 2009. "Towards the global adoption of XBRL using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 46-60.
    3. Richard A. Wolfe, 1994. "Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique And Suggested Research Directions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 405-431, May.
    4. Blaize Horner Reich & Izak Benbasat, 1990. "An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Success of Customer-Oriented Strategic Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 325-347, September.
    5. Debreceny, Roger & Farewell, Stephanie & Piechocki, Maciej & Felden, Carsten & Gräning, André, 2010. "Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 296-306, June.
    6. Monideepa Tarafdar & Rahul K. Roy, 2003. "Analyzing the Adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems in Indian Organizations: A Process Framework," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 21-51, January.
    7. Williams, Susan P. & Scifleet, Paul A. & Hardy, Catherine A., 2006. "Online business reporting: An information management perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 91-101.
    8. Fisher, Robert J & Price, Linda L, 1992. "An Investigation into the Social Context of Early Adoption Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 477-486, December.
    9. Thong, J. Y. L. & Yap, C. S., 1995. "CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 429-442, August.
    10. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    11. Ada Scupola, 2003. "The Adoption of Internet Commerce by SMEs in the South of Italy: An Environmental, Technological and Organizational Perspective," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 52-71, January.
    12. Yoon, Hyungwook & Zo, Hangjung & Ciganek, Andrew P., 2011. "Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 157-163, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sharifah Milda Amirul & Noor Ismawati Jaafar & Anna Azriati Che Azmi, 2022. "Two decades of XBRL: a science mapping of research trends and future research agenda," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2301-2324, August.
    2. Ariel Markelevich & Lewis Shaw & Hagit Weihs, 2015. "The Israeli XBRL Adoption Experience," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 117-133, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenyang Bai & Manabu Sakaue & Fumiko Takeda, 2014. "The Impact of XBRL Adoption on the Information Environment: Evidence from Japan," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 4, pages 49-74, December.
    2. Valentinetti, Diego & Rea, Michele A., 2012. "IFRS Taxonomy and financial reporting practices: The case of Italian listed companies," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 163-180.
    3. Omar Ikbal Tawfik1 & Ahmad Faisal Hayek & Ahnaf Ali Al-Smadi, 2017. "The Extend of Applying the Extensible Business Reporting Language at Jordanian Industrial Companies," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 66-75.
    4. André Gräning & Carsten Felden & Maciej Piechocki, 2011. "Status Quo and Potential of XBRL for Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(4), pages 231-239, August.
    5. Diego Valentinetti & Michele A. Rea, 2013. "XBRL for Financial Reporting: Evidence on Italian GAAP versus IFRS," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 237-259, September.
    6. Saiful Azam, 2014. "Perceived Environmental Factors And The Intention To Adopt A Standard Business Reporting Facility: A Survey Of Australian Corporate Cfos," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 10(2), pages 147-173.
    7. Ariel Markelevich & Lewis Shaw & Hagit Weihs, 2015. "The Israeli XBRL Adoption Experience," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 117-133, June.
    8. Malmi, Teemu, 1999. "Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 649-672, November.
    9. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    10. Wasapon Thanabodypath & Achara Chandrachai & Sudkate Chaiyo & Orawon Chailapakul, 2021. "Industrial Buyer Innovation Adoption Model: A Focus on a Smartphone-Based Electrochemical Analytical Device for Toxic Heavy Metal Detection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Ramon Casadesus-Masanell & Gastón Llanes, 2011. "Mixed Source," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(7), pages 1212-1230, July.
    12. Aboelmaged, Mohamed Gamal, 2014. "Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 639-651.
    13. Shan, Yuan George & Troshani, Indrit & Richardson, Grant, 2015. "An empirical comparison of the effect of XBRL on audit fees in the US and Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 89-103.
    14. Mohammad Alamgir Hossain & Mohammed Quaddus, 2015. "Radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption: A cross-sectional comparison of voluntary and mandatory contexts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1057-1076, October.
    15. Martínez-Román, Juan A. & Gamero, Javier & Tamayo, Juan A. & Delgado-González, Loreto, 2020. "Empirical analysis of organizational archetypes based on generation and adoption of knowledge and technologies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    16. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107687899.
    17. Gianluca Vagnani & Corrado Gatti & Luca Proietti, 2019. "A conceptual framework of the adoption of innovations in organizations: a meta-analytical review of the literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(4), pages 1023-1062, December.
    18. Jap Efendi & Jin Dong Park & Chandra Subramaniam, 2016. "Does the XBRL Reporting Format Provide Incremental Information Value? A Study Using XBRL Disclosures During the Voluntary Filing Program," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(2), pages 259-285, June.
    19. Rana, Nripendra P. & Barnard, Daniel J. & Baabdullah, Abdullah M.A. & Rees, Daniel & Roderick, Sian, 2019. "Exploring barriers of m-commerce adoption in SMEs in the UK: Developing a framework using ISM," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 141-153.
    20. Chou, Chi-Chun & Hwang, Nen-Chen Richard & Wang, Tawei & Debreceny, Roger, 2018. "The topical link model-integrating topic-centric information in XBRL-formatted reports," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 16-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:22:y:2011:i:2:p:161-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.