IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v12y2010i4d10.1007_s11009-008-9118-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Method for Bounding the Distance Between Sums of Independent Integer-Valued Random Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Eutichia Vaggelatou

    (University of Athens)

Abstract

Let X 1, X 2,..., X n and Y 1, Y 2,..., Y n be two sequences of independent random variables which take values in ℤ and have finite second moments. Using a new probabilistic method, upper bounds for the Kolmogorov and total variation distances between the distributions of the sums $\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i}$ and $\sum_{i=1}^{n}Y_{i}$ are proposed. These bounds adopt a simple closed form when the distributions of the coordinates are compared with respect to the convex order. Moreover, they include a factor which depends on the smoothness of the distribution of the sum of the X i ’s or Y i ’s, in that way leading to sharp approximation error estimates, under appropriate conditions for the distribution parameters. Finally, specific examples, concerning approximation bounds for various discrete distributions, are presented for illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Eutichia Vaggelatou, 2010. "A New Method for Bounding the Distance Between Sums of Independent Integer-Valued Random Variables," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 587-607, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:12:y:2010:i:4:d:10.1007_s11009-008-9118-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-008-9118-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-008-9118-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-008-9118-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denuit, Michel & Lefevre, Claude & Utev, Sergey, 2002. "Measuring the impact of dependence between claims occurrences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Kaas, R., 1993. "How to (and how not to) compute stop-loss premiums in practice," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 241-254, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C., 2013. "Survival probabilities in bivariate risk models, with application to reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 632-642.
    2. Reijnen, Rajko & Albers, Willem & Kallenberg, Wilbert C.M., 2005. "Approximations for stop-loss reinsurance premiums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 237-250, June.
    3. Dhaene, Jan & Vandebroek, Martina, 1995. "Recursions for the individual model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 31-38, April.
    4. Kaas, Rob & Tang, Qihe, 2005. "A large deviation result for aggregate claims with dependent claim occurrences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 251-259, June.
    5. Dhaene, Jan & Denuit, Michel, 1999. "The safest dependence structure among risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 11-21, September.
    6. Areski Cousin & Diana Dorobantu & Didier Rullière, 2013. "An extension of Davis and Lo's contagion model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 407-420, February.
    7. John Mullahy, 2017. "Individual Results May Vary: Elementary Analytics of Inequality-Probability Bounds, with Applications to Health-Outcome Treatment Effects," NBER Working Papers 23603, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Mullahy, John, 2018. "Individual results may vary: Inequality-probability bounds for some health-outcome treatment effects," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 151-162.
    9. Denuit, Michel & Kiriliouk, Anna & Segers, Johan, 2014. "Max-Factor individual risk models with application to credit portfolios," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2014048, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    10. Denuit, Michel & Kiriliouk, Anna & Segers, Johan, 2015. "Max-factor individual risk models with application to credit portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 162-172.
    11. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2015. "Discrete Schur-constant models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 343-362.
    12. Denuit, Michel & Lefevre, Claude & Utev, Sergey, 2002. "Measuring the impact of dependence between claims occurrences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2015. "Discrete Schur-constant models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 343-362.
    14. Ćmiel, Bogdan & Ledwina, Teresa, 2020. "Validation of association," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 55-67.
    15. Liu, Yan, 2007. "Precise large deviations for negatively associated random variables with consistently varying tails," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 181-189, January.
    16. Dhaene, J. & Goovaerts, M. J., 1997. "On the dependency of risks in the individual life model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 243-253, May.
    17. Michel Denuit & Anna Kiriliouk & Johan Segers, 2014. "Max-factor individual risk models with application to credit portfolios," Papers 1412.3230, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:12:y:2010:i:4:d:10.1007_s11009-008-9118-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.