IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1412.3230.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Max-factor individual risk models with application to credit portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Denuit
  • Anna Kiriliouk
  • Johan Segers

Abstract

Individual risk models need to capture possible correlations as failing to do so typically results in an underestimation of extreme quantiles of the aggregate loss. Such dependence modelling is particularly important for managing credit risk, for instance, where joint defaults are a major cause of concern. Often, the dependence between the individual loss occurrence indicators is driven by a small number of unobservable factors. Conditional loss probabilities are then expressed as monotone functions of linear combinations of these hidden factors. However, combining the factors in a linear way allows for some compensation between them. Such diversification effects are not always desirable and this is why the present work proposes a new model replacing linear combinations with maxima. These max-factor models give more insight into which of the factors is dominant.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Denuit & Anna Kiriliouk & Johan Segers, 2014. "Max-factor individual risk models with application to credit portfolios," Papers 1412.3230, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1412.3230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.3230
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anastasiadis, Simon & Chukova, Stefanka, 2012. "Multivariate insurance models: An overview," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 222-227.
    2. Denuit, Michel & Lefevre, Claude & Utev, Sergey, 2002. "Measuring the impact of dependence between claims occurrences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Denuit, Michel & Lambert, Philippe, 2005. "Constraints on concordance measures in bivariate discrete data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 40-57, March.
    4. Cossette, Helene & Gaillardetz, Patrice & Marceau, Etienne & Rioux, Jacques, 2002. "On two dependent individual risk models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 153-166, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denuit, Michel & Kiriliouk, Anna & Segers, Johan, 2014. "Max-Factor individual risk models with application to credit portfolios," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2014048, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Denuit, Michel & Kiriliouk, Anna & Segers, Johan, 2015. "Max-factor individual risk models with application to credit portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 162-172.
    3. Liu, Yan, 2007. "Precise large deviations for negatively associated random variables with consistently varying tails," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 181-189, January.
    4. Faugeras, Olivier P., 2015. "Maximal coupling of empirical copulas for discrete vectors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 179-186.
    5. Emanuela Raffinetti & Fabio Aimar, 2019. "MDCgo takes up the association/correlation challenge for grouped ordinal data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(4), pages 527-561, December.
    6. Katarzyna Bien & Ingmar Nolte & Winfried Pohlmeier, 2008. "A multivariate integer count hurdle model: theory and application to exchange rate dynamics," Studies in Empirical Economics, in: Luc Bauwens & Winfried Pohlmeier & David Veredas (ed.), High Frequency Financial Econometrics, pages 31-48, Springer.
    7. Kolev, Nikolai & Paiva, Delhi, 2005. "Multinomial model for random sums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 494-504, December.
    8. Yeo, Keng Leong & Valdez, Emiliano A., 2006. "Claim dependence with common effects in credibility models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 609-629, June.
    9. Quinn C, 2009. "Measuring income-related inequalities in health using a parametric dependence function," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 09/24, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    10. Aristidis Nikoloulopoulos & Dimitris Karlis, 2010. "Regression in a copula model for bivariate count data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 1555-1568.
    11. Koen Decancq, 2014. "Copula-based measurement of dependence between dimensions of well-being," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(3), pages 681-701.
    12. Kaas, Rob & Tang, Qihe, 2005. "A large deviation result for aggregate claims with dependent claim occurrences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 251-259, June.
    13. Geenens Gery, 2020. "Copula modeling for discrete random vectors," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 417-440, January.
    14. Fokianos, Konstantinos & Fried, Roland & Kharin, Yuriy & Voloshko, Valeriy, 2022. "Statistical analysis of multivariate discrete-valued time series," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Eugenio J. Miravete, 2009. "Competing with Menus of Tariff Options," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 7(1), pages 188-205, March.
    16. Bien, Katarzyna & Nolte, Ingmar & Pohlmeier, Winfried, 2006. "Estimating liquidity using information on the multivariate trading process," CoFE Discussion Papers 06/04, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    17. Emanuela Raffinetti & Pier Alda Ferrari, 2021. "A dependence measure flow tree through Monte Carlo simulations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 467-496, April.
    18. Siem Jan Koopman & Rutger Lit & André Lucas & Anne Opschoor, 2018. "Dynamic discrete copula models for high‐frequency stock price changes," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(7), pages 966-985, November.
    19. Areski Cousin & Diana Dorobantu & Didier Rullière, 2013. "An extension of Davis and Lo's contagion model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 407-420, February.
    20. Fantazzini, Dean, 2020. "Discussing copulas with Sergey Aivazian: a memoir," MPRA Paper 102317, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1412.3230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.