IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lifeda/v27y2021i4d10.1007_s10985-021-09534-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator for transition probabilities in partially non-Markov multi-state models

Author

Listed:
  • Niklas Maltzahn

    (Oslo University Hospital
    University of Oslo)

  • Rune Hoff

    (Oslo University Hospital)

  • Odd O. Aalen

    (University of Oslo)

  • Ingrid S. Mehlum

    (National Institute of Occupational Health)

  • Hein Putter

    (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University)

  • Jon Michael Gran

    (Oslo University Hospital
    University of Oslo)

Abstract

Multi-state models are increasingly being used to model complex epidemiological and clinical outcomes over time. It is common to assume that the models are Markov, but the assumption can often be unrealistic. The Markov assumption is seldomly checked and violations can lead to biased estimation of many parameters of interest. This is a well known problem for the standard Aalen-Johansen estimator of transition probabilities and several alternative estimators, not relying on the Markov assumption, have been suggested. A particularly simple approach known as landmarking have resulted in the Landmark-Aalen-Johansen estimator. Since landmarking is a stratification method a disadvantage of landmarking is data reduction, leading to a loss of power. This is problematic for “less traveled” transitions, and undesirable when such transitions indeed exhibit Markov behaviour. Introducing the concept of partially non-Markov multi-state models, we suggest a hybrid landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator for transition probabilities. We also show how non-Markov transitions can be identified using a testing procedure. The proposed estimator is a compromise between regular Aalen-Johansen and landmark estimation, using transition specific landmarking, and can drastically improve statistical power. We show that the proposed estimator is consistent, but that the traditional variance estimator can underestimate the variance of both the hybrid and landmark estimator. Bootstrapping is therefore recommended. The methods are compared in a simulation study and in a real data application using registry data to model individual transitions for a birth cohort of 184 951 Norwegian men between states of sick leave, disability, education, work and unemployment.

Suggested Citation

  • Niklas Maltzahn & Rune Hoff & Odd O. Aalen & Ingrid S. Mehlum & Hein Putter & Jon Michael Gran, 2021. "A hybrid landmark Aalen-Johansen estimator for transition probabilities in partially non-Markov multi-state models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 737-760, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:27:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10985-021-09534-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10985-021-09534-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-021-09534-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10985-021-09534-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Somnath Datta & Glen A. Satten, 2002. "Estimation of Integrated Transition Hazards and Stage Occupation Probabilities for Non-Markov Systems Under Dependent Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 792-802, December.
    2. Andrew C. Titman, 2015. "Transition probability estimates for non-Markov multi-state models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1034-1041, December.
    3. David V. Glidden, 2002. "Robust Inference for Event Probabilities with Non-Markov Event Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 361-368, June.
    4. Luís Meira-Machado & Jacobo Uña-Álvarez & Somnath Datta, 2015. "Nonparametric estimation of conditional transition probabilities in a non-Markov illness-death model," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 377-397, June.
    5. de Wreede, Liesbeth C. & Fiocco, Marta & Putter, Hein, 2011. "mstate: An R Package for the Analysis of Competing Risks and Multi-State Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 38(i07).
    6. Jacobo de Uña-Álvarez & Luís Meira-Machado, 2015. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities in the non-Markov illness-death model: A comparative study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 364-375, June.
    7. Datta, Somnath & Satten, Glen A., 2001. "Validity of the Aalen-Johansen estimators of stage occupation probabilities and Nelson-Aalen estimators of integrated transition hazards for non-Markov models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 403-411, December.
    8. Odd O. Aalen & Ørnulf Borgan & Harald Fekjær, 2001. "Covariate Adjustment of Event Histories Estimated from Markov Chains: The Additive Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 993-1001, December.
    9. Rune Hoff & Hein Putter & Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum & Jon Michael Gran, 2019. "Landmark estimation of transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models with covariates," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 660-680, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nießl, Alexandra & Allignol, Arthur & Beyersmann, Jan & Mueller, Carina, 2023. "Statistical inference for state occupation and transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models subject to both random left-truncation and right-censoring," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 110-124.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rune Hoff & Hein Putter & Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum & Jon Michael Gran, 2019. "Landmark estimation of transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models with covariates," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 660-680, October.
    2. Giorgos Bakoyannis & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2022. "Nonparametric tests for multistate processes with clustered data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(5), pages 837-867, October.
    3. Jacobo de Uña‐Álvarez & Micha Mandel, 2018. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities for a general progressive multi‐state model under cross‐sectional sampling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1203-1212, December.
    4. Jan Beyersmann & Hein Putter, 2014. "A note on computing average state occupation times," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(62), pages 1681-1696.
    5. Gustavo Soutinho & Luís Meira-Machado, 2022. "Methods for checking the Markov condition in multi-state survival data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 751-780, April.
    6. Guibert, Quentin & Planchet, Frédéric, 2018. "Non-parametric inference of transition probabilities based on Aalen–Johansen integral estimators for acyclic multi-state models: application to LTC insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 21-36.
    7. Nießl, Alexandra & Allignol, Arthur & Beyersmann, Jan & Mueller, Carina, 2023. "Statistical inference for state occupation and transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models subject to both random left-truncation and right-censoring," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 110-124.
    8. Jacobo de Uña-Álvarez & Luís Meira-Machado, 2015. "Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities in the non-Markov illness-death model: A comparative study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 364-375, June.
    9. Dennis Dobler & Andrew Titman, 2020. "Dynamic inference for non‐Markov transition probabilities under random right censoring," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(2), pages 572-586, June.
    10. Somnath Datta & Rajeshwari Sundaram, 2006. "Nonparametric Estimation of Stage Occupation Probabilities in a Multistage Model with Current Status Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 829-837, September.
    11. Gustavo Soutinho & Luís Meira-Machado, 2023. "Nonparametric estimation of the distribution of gap times for recurrent events," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 103-128, March.
    12. Richard J. Cook & Jerald F. Lawless & Bingfeng Xie, 2022. "Marker-dependent observation and carry-forward of internal covariates in Cox regression," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 560-584, October.
    13. Ritesh Ramchandani & Dianne M. Finkelstein & David A. Schoenfeld, 2020. "Estimation for an accelerated failure time model with intermediate states as auxiliary information," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Fuino, Michel & Wagner, Joël, 2018. "Long-term care models and dependence probability tables by acuity level: New empirical evidence from Switzerland," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 51-70.
    15. Richard J. Cook & Leilei Zeng & Ker-Ai Lee, 2008. "A Multistate Model for Bivariate Interval-Censored Failure Time Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1100-1109, December.
    16. Ling Lan & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Somnath Datta, 2017. "Non-parametric regression in clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster size," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(1), pages 31-57, January.
    17. Arthur Allignol & Martin Schumacher & Jan Beyersmann, 2011. "Estimating summary functionals in multistate models with an application to hospital infection data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 181-197, June.
    18. repec:jss:jstsof:38:i03 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jackson, Christopher, 2016. "flexsurv: A Platform for Parametric Survival Modeling in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i08).
    20. Timothy K Marcella & Scott M Gende & Daniel D Roby & Arthur Allignol, 2017. "Disturbance of a rare seabird by ship-based tourism in a marine protected area," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, May.
    21. Xiaofeng Lv & Gupeng Zhang & Guangyu Ren, 2017. "Gini index estimation for lifetime data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 275-304, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:27:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10985-021-09534-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.