IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v23y2020i4d10.1007_s10951-019-00632-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Efficient Filtering Algorithm for the Unary Resource Constraint with Transition Times and Optional Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Sascha Cauwelaert

    (UCLouvain)

  • Cyrille Dejemeppe

    (n-Side)

  • Pierre Schaus

    (UCLouvain)

Abstract

This paper describes a unified global constraint to model scheduling problems with unary resources, i.e., each resource can process only a single activity at a time. In addition, the constraint enforces sequence-dependent transition times between activities. It often happens that activities are grouped into families with zero transition times within a family. Moreover, some of the activities might be optional from the resource viewpoint (typically in the case of alternative resources). The global constraint unifies reasoning with both optional activities and families of activities. The scalable filtering algorithms we discuss keep a low time complexity of $$\mathcal {O}(n \cdot \log (n) \cdot \log (f))$$ O ( n · log ( n ) · log ( f ) ) , where n is the number of tasks on the resource and f is the number of families. This results from the fact that we extend the $$\varTheta $$ Θ -tree data structure used for the Unary Resource constraint without transition times. Our experiments demonstrate that our global constraint strengthens the pruning of domains as compared with existing approaches, leading to important speedups. Moreover, our low time complexity allows maintaining a small overhead, even for large instances. These conclusions are particularly true when optional activities are present in the problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Sascha Cauwelaert & Cyrille Dejemeppe & Pierre Schaus, 2020. "An Efficient Filtering Algorithm for the Unary Resource Constraint with Transition Times and Optional Activities," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 431-449, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:23:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10951-019-00632-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-019-00632-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-019-00632-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-019-00632-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Artigues & Dominique Feillet, 2008. "A branch and bound method for the job-shop problem with sequence-dependent setup times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 135-159, March.
    2. Allahverdi, Ali & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2008. "A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 985-1032, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javad Rezaeian & Reza Alizadeh Foroutan & Toraj Mojibi & Yacob Khojasteh, 2023. "Sensitivity Analysis of the Unrelated Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem with Rework Processes and Machine Eligibility Restrictions," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Marko Ɖurasević & Domagoj Jakobović, 2019. "Creating dispatching rules by simple ensemble combination," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 959-1013, December.
    3. Dongni Li & Xianwen Meng & Miao Li & Yunna Tian, 2016. "An ACO-based intercell scheduling approach for job shop cells with multiple single processing machines and one batch processing machine," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 283-296, April.
    4. Byung-Cheon Choi & Myoung-Ju Park, 2015. "A Batch Scheduling Problem with Two Agents," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(06), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Bozorgirad, Mir Abbas & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2013. "Bi-criteria group scheduling in hybrid flowshops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 599-612.
    6. Weng, Wei & Fujimura, Shigeru, 2012. "Control methods for dynamic time-based manufacturing under customized product lead times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 86-96.
    7. Omid Shahvari & Rasaratnam Logendran & Madjid Tavana, 2022. "An efficient model-based branch-and-price algorithm for unrelated-parallel machine batching and scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 589-621, October.
    8. Rossi, Andrea, 2014. "Flexible job shop scheduling with sequence-dependent setup and transportation times by ant colony with reinforced pheromone relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 253-267.
    9. Shi-Sheng Li & Ren-Xia Chen & Qi Feng, 2016. "Scheduling two job families on a single machine with two competitive agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 784-799, October.
    10. A. Dolgui & M. Kovalyov & K. Shchamialiova, 2011. "Multi-product lot-sizing and sequencing on a single imperfect machine," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 465-482, December.
    11. Jose L. Andrade-Pineda & David Canca & Pedro L. Gonzalez-R & M. Calle, 2020. "Scheduling a dual-resource flexible job shop with makespan and due date-related criteria," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 5-35, August.
    12. Löhndorf, Nils & Riel, Manuel & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 170-176.
    13. Shahvari, Omid & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2016. "Hybrid flow shop batching and scheduling with a bi-criteria objective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 239-258.
    14. Timo Gschwind & Stefan Irnich & Simon Emde & Christian Tilk, 2018. "Branch-Cut-and-Price for the Scheduling Deliveries with Time Windows in a Direct Shipping Network," Working Papers 1805, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    15. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    16. Wex, Felix & Schryen, Guido & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2014. "Emergency response in natural disaster management: Allocation and scheduling of rescue units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 697-708.
    17. Ansis Ozolins, 2020. "Bounded dynamic programming algorithm for the job shop problem with sequence dependent setup times," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1701-1728, September.
    18. Hinder, Oliver & Mason, Andrew J., 2017. "A novel integer programing formulation for scheduling with family setup times on a single machine to minimize maximum lateness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 411-423.
    19. Waldherr, Stefan & Knust, Sigrid, 2017. "Decomposition algorithms for synchronous flow shop problems with additional resources and setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 847-863.
    20. Dirk Briskorn & Konrad Stephan & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Minimizing the makespan on a single machine subject to modular setups," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 125-137, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:23:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10951-019-00632-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.