IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/josatr/v6y2021i1d10.1186_s41072-021-00085-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conditions influencing the choice between direct shipment and transshipment in maritime shipping network

Author

Listed:
  • Hoshi Tagawa

    (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

  • Tomoya Kawasaki

    (The University of Tokyo)

  • Shinya Hanaoka

    (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

Abstract

This study examines the conditions that influence the choice between direct shipment and transshipment, focusing on two factors: geographical distance and demand. We develop a two-stage model comprising shipping lines and shippers, and apply it to a virtual maritime network with one origin, two destination ports, and one hub port. The generalized costs of shippers in the optimum direct shipment and in transshipment for the shipping lines model are compared to evaluate the choice between direct shipment and transshipment. We find that competitiveness of the port as a hub, indicating the cargo volume aggregated in transshipment, is essential for examining the cost-effectiveness of direct shipment and transshipment. The comparison between the cost-effectiveness of direct shipment and transshipment is based on the configuration of each network, especially in terms of frequency and the vessel size deployed. Direct shipment can be more cost-effective for short distances.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoshi Tagawa & Tomoya Kawasaki & Shinya Hanaoka, 2021. "Conditions influencing the choice between direct shipment and transshipment in maritime shipping network," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:6:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-021-00085-3
    DOI: 10.1186/s41072-021-00085-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41072-021-00085-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41072-021-00085-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tran, Nguyen Khoi, 2011. "Studying port selection on liner routes: An approach from logistics perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 39-53.
    2. Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Hua & Meng, Qiang, 2015. "Itinerary provision and pricing in container liner shipping revenue management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 135-146.
    3. Adolf K.Y. Ng & Zaili Yang & Stephen Cahoon & Paul T.W. Lee & Dago Alain Gohomene & Zaili l. Yang & Stephen Bonsal & Eleftherios Maistralis & Jin Wang & Kevin X. Li, 2016. "The Attractiveness of Ports in West Africa: Some Lessons from Shipping Lines' Port Selection," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 416-426, September.
    4. Morrell, Peter, 2008. "Can long-haul low-cost airlines be successful?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 61-67.
    5. Sun, Zhuo & Zheng, Jianfeng, 2016. "Finding potential hub locations for liner shipping," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 750-761.
    6. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 701-714.
    7. Notteboom, Theo E. & Parola, Francesco & Satta, Giovanni, 2019. "The relationship between transhipment incidence and throughput volatility in North European and Mediterranean container ports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 371-381.
    8. Chang, Young-Tae & Lee, Sang-Yoon & Tongzon, Jose L., 2008. "Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 877-885, November.
    9. S. Veldman & L. Garcia-Alonso & M. Liu, 2016. "Testing port choice models using physical and monetary data: a comparative case study for the Spanish container trades," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 495-508, May.
    10. Wang, Hua & Meng, Qiang & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2014. "Game-theoretical models for competition analysis in a new emerging liner container shipping market," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 201-227.
    11. Notteboom, Theo E. & Vernimmen, Bert, 2009. "The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 325-337.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jamileh Yousefi & Sahand Ashtab & Amirali Yasaei & Allu George & Ali Mukarram & Satinderpal Singh Sandhu, 2023. "Multiple Linear Regression Analysis of Canada’s Freight Transportation Framework," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Kawasaki, Tomoya & Loh, Zhan Teng & Hanaoka, Shinya, 2023. "Geospatial transition of port hinterland considering intermodal service frequency: A case study in Bangladesh," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    2. Achilleas Tsantis & John Mangan & Agustina Calatayud & Roberto Palacin, 2023. "Container shipping: a systematic literature review of themes and factors that influence the establishment of direct connections between countries," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(4), pages 667-697, December.
    3. Munim, Ziaul Haque & Duru, Okan & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Transhipment port's competitiveness forecasting using analytic network process modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-82.
    4. Sheng, Dian & Li, Zhi-Chun & Fu, Xiaowen & Gillen, David, 2017. "Modeling the effects of unilateral and uniform emission regulations under shipping company and port competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 99-114.
    5. Shuaian Wang & Dan Zhuge & Lu Zhen & Chung-Yee Lee, 2021. "Liner Shipping Service Planning Under Sulfur Emission Regulations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 491-509, March.
    6. Wang, Ying & Yeo, Gi-Tae & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2014. "Choosing optimal bunkering ports for liner shipping companies: A hybrid Fuzzy-Delphi–TOPSIS approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 358-365.
    7. Sun, Qinghe & Meng, Qiang & Chou, Mabel C., 2021. "Optimizing voyage charterparty (VCP) arrangement: Laytime negotiation and operations coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 263-270.
    8. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    9. De, Arijit & Choudhary, Alok & Turkay, Metin & Tiwari, Manoj K., 2021. "Bunkering policies for a fuel bunker management problem for liner shipping networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 927-939.
    10. Button, Kenneth & Chin, Anthony & Kramberger, Tomaž, 2015. "Incorporating subjective elements into liners' seaport choice assessments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 125-133.
    11. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2015. "Robust bunker management for liner shipping networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 789-797.
    12. Zheng, Jianfeng & Zhang, Wenlong & Qi, Jingwen & Wang, Shuaian, 2019. "Canal effects on a liner hub location problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 230-247.
    13. Meng, Qiang & Du, Yuquan & Wang, Yadong, 2016. "Shipping log data based container ship fuel efficiency modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 207-229.
    14. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2013. "Containership scheduling with transit-time-sensitive container shipment demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 68-83.
    15. Yang, Yi-Chih & Chen, Shu-Ling, 2016. "Determinants of global logistics hub ports: Comparison of the port development policies of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 179-189.
    16. Chathumi Kavirathna & Tomoya Kawasaki & Shinya Hanaoka & Takuma Matsuda, 2018. "Transshipment hub port selection criteria by shipping lines: the case of hub ports around the bay of Bengal," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Zheng, Wei & Li, Bo & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Effects of risk-aversion on competing shipping lines’ pricing strategies with uncertain demands," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 337-356.
    18. Xi Jiang & Haijun Mao & Yadong Wang & Hao Zhang, 2020. "Liner Shipping Schedule Design for Near-Sea Routes Considering Big Customers’ Preferences on Ship Arrival Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Pierre, Cariou & Francesco, Parola & Theo, Notteboom, 2019. "Towards low carbon global supply chains: A multi-trade analysis of CO2 emission reductions in container shipping," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 17-28.
    20. Fukasawa, Ricardo & He, Qie & Song, Yongjia, 2016. "A disjunctive convex programming approach to the pollution-routing problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 61-79.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:6:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-021-00085-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.