IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v173y2017i3d10.1007_s10957-016-1056-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity of Scheduling Problem in Single-Machine Flexible Manufacturing System with Cyclic Transportation and Unlimited Buffers

Author

Listed:
  • Marie-Laure Espinouse

    (Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, G-SCOP)

  • Grzegorz Pawlak

    (Poznan University of Technology)

  • Malgorzata Sterna

    (Poznan University of Technology)

Abstract

The paper concerns complexity studies on the scheduling problem arising in a simple flexible manufacturing system. The system consists of a single machine, one depot (both with unlimited buffers), and one vehicle (automated guided vehicle). The vehicle operates according to the regular metro strategy. This means that it travels in cycles of the constant length, without stops, transporting at most one job at a time between the depot and the machine. The machine executes available jobs in the non-preemptive way. The goal is to minimize the schedule length, i.e., to minimize the number of vehicle cycles necessary to transport and execute all jobs in the system. We prove the strong NP-hardness of this problem and show that any list algorithm has the worst-case performance ratio equal to 2. Moreover, we mention that special cases of the considered problem, with zero transportation times from the depot to the machine and from the machine to the depot, are polynomially solvable.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie-Laure Espinouse & Grzegorz Pawlak & Malgorzata Sterna, 2017. "Complexity of Scheduling Problem in Single-Machine Flexible Manufacturing System with Cyclic Transportation and Unlimited Buffers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 1042-1054, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:173:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-016-1056-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-016-1056-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-016-1056-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-016-1056-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lacomme, Philippe & Larabi, Mohand & Tchernev, Nikolay, 2013. "Job-shop based framework for simultaneous scheduling of machines and automated guided vehicles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 24-34.
    2. Caumond, A. & Lacomme, P. & Moukrim, A. & Tchernev, N., 2009. "An MILP for scheduling problems in an FMS with one vehicle," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 706-722, December.
    3. Ventura, José A. & Rieksts, Brian Q., 2009. "Optimal location of dwell points in a single loop AGV system with time restrictions on vehicle availability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 93-104, January.
    4. Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Bell, Michael G.H., 2010. "An uncertainty-aware AGV assignment algorithm for automated container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 354-366, May.
    5. Kats, Vladimir & Levner, Eugene, 2011. "A faster algorithm for 2-cyclic robotic scheduling with a fixed robot route and interval processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 51-56, February.
    6. Co, Christine G. & Tanchoco, J. M. A., 1991. "A review of research on AGVS vehicle management," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 35-42, February.
    7. Vis, Iris F.A., 2006. "Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 677-709, May.
    8. Sławomir Bąk & Jacek Błażewicz & Grzegorz Pawlak & Maciej Płaza & Edmund K. Burke & Graham Kendall, 2011. "A Parallel Branch-and-Bound Approach to the Rectangular Guillotine Strip Cutting Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 15-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fragapane, Giuseppe & de Koster, René & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Strandhagen, Jan Ola, 2021. "Planning and control of autonomous mobile robots for intralogistics: Literature review and research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 405-426.
    2. Torres, Isidro Ramos & Romero Dessens, Luis Felipe & Martínez Flores, José Luis & Olivares Benítez, Elías, 2015. "Review of Comprehensive Approaches in Optimizing AGV Systems," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 203-232, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & Seyed Mahdi Homayouni, 2019. "Joint production and transportation scheduling in flexible manufacturing systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 879-908, August.
    4. Arash Amirteimoori & Reza Kia, 2023. "Concurrent scheduling of jobs and AGVs in a flexible job shop system: a parallel hybrid PSO-GA meta-heuristic," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 727-753, September.
    5. Ilias Vlachos & Rodrigo Martinez Pascazzi & Miltiadis Ntotis & Konstantina Spanaki & Stella Despoudi & Panagiotis Repoussis, 2022. "Smart and flexible manufacturing systems using Autonomous Guided Vehicles (AGVs) and the Internet of Things (IoT)," Post-Print hal-03825237, HAL.
    6. Philippe Lacomme & Aziz Moukrim & Alain Quilliot & Marina Vinot, 2019. "Integration of routing into a resource-constrained project scheduling problem," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(4), pages 421-464, December.
    7. Vitalii Naumov & Daniel Kubek & Paweł Więcek & Iwona Skalna & Jerzy Duda & Robert Goncerz & Tomasz Derlecki, 2021. "Optimizing Energy Consumption in Internal Transportation Using Dynamic Transportation Vehicles Assignment Model: Case Study in Printing Company," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Moussa Abderrahim & Abdelghani Bekrar & Damien Trentesaux & Nassima Aissani & Karim Bouamrane, 2020. "Manufacturing 4.0 Operations Scheduling with AGV Battery Management Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Olatunde T. Baruwa & Miquel A. Piera, 2016. "A coloured Petri net-based hybrid heuristic search approach to simultaneous scheduling of machines and automated guided vehicles," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 4773-4792, August.
    10. Carlo, Héctor J. & Vis, Iris F.A. & Roodbergen, Kees Jan, 2014. "Transport operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, research directions and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 1-13.
    11. Caroline Lloyd & Jonathan Payne, 2021. "Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 109-124, March.
    12. Hwi Kim, Sang & Hwang, Hark, 1999. "An adaptive dispatching algorithm for automated guided vehicles based on an evolutionary process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 465-472, April.
    13. Xin Li & Richard Y. K. Fung, 2016. "Optimal K-unit cycle scheduling of two-cluster tools with residency constraints and general robot moving times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 165-176, April.
    14. Zhongbin Zhao & Xifu Wang & Suxin Cheng & Wei Liu & Lijun Jiang, 2022. "A New Synchronous Handling Technology of Double Stack Container Trains in Sea-Rail Intermodal Terminals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1, September.
    15. James T. Lin & Chun-Chih Chiu & Edward Huang & Hung-Ming Chen, 2018. "A Multi-Fidelity Model Approach for Simultaneous Scheduling of Machines and Vehicles in Flexible Manufacturing Systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(01), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Le-Anh, T. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2004. "A Review Of Design And Control Of Automated Guided Vehicle Systems," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS;2004-030-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    17. Wei, Xiaoyang & Jia, Shuai & Meng, Qiang & Tan, Kok Choon, 2020. "Tugboat scheduling for container ports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    18. John Lees-Miller, 2016. "Minimising average passenger waiting time in personal rapid transit systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 405-424, January.
    19. repec:zib:zbjtin:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:54-57 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Jenny Nossack & Dirk Briskorn & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Container Dispatching and Conflict-Free Yard Crane Routing in an Automated Container Terminal," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1059-1076, October.
    21. Mantel, Ronald J. & Landeweerd, Henri R. A., 1995. "Design and operational control of an AGV system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 257-266, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:173:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-016-1056-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.