IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v29y2018i6d10.1007_s10845-015-1182-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An effective discrete invasive weed optimization algorithm for lot-streaming flowshop scheduling problems

Author

Listed:
  • Hong-Yan Sang

    (Liaocheng University)

  • Quan-Ke Pan

    (Shanghai University)

  • Pei-Yong Duan

    (Liaocheng University)

  • Jun-Qing Li

    (Liaocheng University)

Abstract

Lot-streaming scheduling problem has been an active area of research due to its important applications in modern industries. This paper deals with the lot-streaming flowshop problem with sequence-dependent setup times with makespan criterion. An effective discrete invasive weed optimization (DIWO) algorithm is presented with new characteristics. A job permutation representation is utilized and an adapted Nawaz–Enscore–Ham heuristic is employed to ensure an initial weed colony with a certain level of quality. A new spatial dispersal model is designed based on the normal distribution and the property of tangent function to enhance global search. A local search procedure based on the insertion neighborhood is employed to perform local exploitation. The presented DIWO is calibrated by means of the design of experiments approach. A comparative evaluation is carried out with several best performing algorithms based on a total of 280 randomly generated instances. The numerical experiments show that the presented DIWO algorithm produces significantly better results than the competing algorithms and it constitutes a new state-of-the-art solution for the lot-streaming flowshop problem with sequence-dependent setup times with makespan criterion.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong-Yan Sang & Quan-Ke Pan & Pei-Yong Duan & Jun-Qing Li, 2018. "An effective discrete invasive weed optimization algorithm for lot-streaming flowshop scheduling problems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1337-1349, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1182-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1182-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-015-1182-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-015-1182-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    2. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2014. "Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 83-95.
    3. Stanley Reiter, 1965. "A System for Managing Job-Shop Production," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39, pages 371-371.
    4. Nawaz, Muhammad & Enscore Jr, E Emory & Ham, Inyong, 1983. "A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 91-95.
    5. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 166-180, April.
    6. Ribas, Imma & Companys, Ramon & Tort-Martorell, Xavier, 2011. "An iterated greedy algorithm for the flowshop scheduling problem with blocking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 293-301, June.
    7. Allahverdi, Ali & Gupta, Jatinder N. D. & Aldowaisan, Tariq, 1999. "A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 219-239, April.
    8. M. R. Garey & D. S. Johnson & Ravi Sethi, 1976. "The Complexity of Flowshop and Jobshop Scheduling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 117-129, May.
    9. Hongyan Sang & Liang Gao & Xinyu Li, 2014. "An Iterated Local Search Algorithm for the Lot-Streaming Flow Shop Scheduling Problem," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 31(06), pages 1-19.
    10. Tseng, Chao-Tang & Liao, Ching-Jong, 2008. "A discrete particle swarm optimization for lot-streaming flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 360-373, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gui Li & Gai-Ge Wang & Shan Wang, 2021. "Two-Population Coevolutionary Algorithm with Dynamic Learning Strategy for Many-Objective Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-34, February.
    2. Wenjie Wang & Guangdong Tian & Gang Yuan & Duc Truong Pham, 2023. "Energy-time tradeoffs for remanufacturing system scheduling using an invasive weed optimization algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1065-1083, March.
    3. Zheng, Zhi-xin & Li, Jun-qing & Duan, Pei-yong, 2019. "Optimal chiller loading by improved artificial fish swarm algorithm for energy saving," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 227-243.
    4. Xiaoqi Zhao & Haipeng Qu & Wenjie Lv & Shuo Li & Jianliang Xu, 2021. "MooFuzz: Many-Objective Optimization Seed Schedule for Fuzzer," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Jiang Li & Lihong Guo & Yan Li & Chang Liu, 2019. "Enhancing Elephant Herding Optimization with Novel Individual Updating Strategies for Large-Scale Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-35, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 166-180, April.
    2. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    3. Matthias Bultmann & Sigrid Knust & Stefan Waldherr, 2018. "Flow shop scheduling with flexible processing times," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 809-829, July.
    4. Rajendran, Chandrasekharan & Ziegler, Hans, 2003. "Scheduling to minimize the sum of weighted flowtime and weighted tardiness of jobs in a flowshop with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(3), pages 513-522, September.
    5. Ding, Jian-Ya & Song, Shiji & Wu, Cheng, 2016. "Carbon-efficient scheduling of flow shops by multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 758-771.
    6. Rubén Ruiz & Ali Allahverdi, 2007. "Some effective heuristics for no-wait flowshops with setup times to minimize total completion time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 143-171, December.
    7. Bagchi, Tapan P. & Gupta, Jatinder N.D. & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2006. "A review of TSP based approaches for flowshop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 816-854, March.
    8. Ruiz, Ruben & Maroto, Concepcion & Alcaraz, Javier, 2005. "Solving the flowshop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times using advanced metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 34-54, August.
    9. Rossit, Daniel Alejandro & Tohmé, Fernando & Frutos, Mariano, 2018. "The Non-Permutation Flow-Shop scheduling problem: A literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 143-153.
    10. Gupta, Jatinder N.D. & Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2006. "Performance guarantees for flowshop heuristics to minimize makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 865-872, March.
    11. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    12. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "Local search methods for the flowshop scheduling problem with flowtime minimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 31-43.
    13. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Lin, Ya-Tai, 2009. "A hybrid genetic local search algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 84-92, October.
    14. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    15. Ramalhinho Lourenco, Helena, 1996. "Sevast'yanov's algorithm for the flow-shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 176-189, May.
    16. Brucker, Peter & Knust, Sigrid & Wang, Guoqing, 2005. "Complexity results for flow-shop problems with a single server," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 398-407, September.
    17. Jean-Paul Watson & Laura Barbulescu & L. Darrell Whitley & Adele E. Howe, 2002. "Contrasting Structured and Random Permutation Flow-Shop Scheduling Problems: Search-Space Topology and Algorithm Performance," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 98-123, May.
    18. Framinan, J. M. & Leisten, R., 2003. "An efficient constructive heuristic for flowtime minimisation in permutation flow shops," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 311-317, August.
    19. J N D Gupta & J E Schaller, 2006. "Minimizing flow time in a flow-line manufacturing cell with family setup times," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(2), pages 163-176, February.
    20. Li, Xiaoping & Wang, Qian & Wu, Cheng, 2009. "Efficient composite heuristics for total flowtime minimization in permutation flow shops," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 155-164, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1182-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.