IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v27y2022i4d10.1007_s13253-022-00504-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Row–Column Sampling Design Using Auxiliary Ranking Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Omer Ozturk

    (The Ohio State University)

  • Olena Kravchuk

    (Food and Wine, University of Adelaide)

  • Raymond Correll

    (Food and Wine, University of Adelaide)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a new class of row–column sampling design when a sampling region is presented by non-overlapping quadrats of an rp-by-p row–column grid. Quadrats are rank-ordered on a relevant auxiliary variable, first in the rp rows of the grid and then in the so formed p ranked columns. This ranking enhances the precision of the sampling using ideas from standard rank set sampling methods. The sampling design falls in the traditional sampling framework where the sample selection probabilities are independent of the variables of interest. Selection probabilities are governed by a spatial design and the auxiliary information to facilitate better sampling coverage over the sampling region. The paper constructs unbiased estimators for population mean, total and provides variance estimates for them. It also shows when the new sampling design performs better than its competitors. The new sampling design is applied to a forest and two agricultural field samples to estimate the population means. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Omer Ozturk & Olena Kravchuk & Raymond Correll, 2022. "Row–Column Sampling Design Using Auxiliary Ranking Variables," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 652-673, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:27:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-022-00504-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-022-00504-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-022-00504-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-022-00504-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omer Ozturk, 2017. "Statistical inference with empty strata in judgment post stratified samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(5), pages 1029-1057, October.
    2. Omer Ozturk & Olena Kravchuk, 2021. "Judgment Post-stratified Assessment Combining Ranking Information from Multiple Sources, with a Field Phenotyping Example," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 329-348, September.
    3. Anton Grafström & Lina Schelin, 2014. "How to Select Representative Samples," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(2), pages 277-290, June.
    4. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Two-stage cluster samples with ranked set sampling designs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(1), pages 63-91, February.
    5. B. L. Robertson & J. A. Brown & T. McDonald & P. Jaksons, 2013. "BAS: Balanced Acceptance Sampling of Natural Resources," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 776-784, September.
    6. McIntyre, G.A., 2005. "A Method for Unbiased Selective Sampling, Using Ranked Sets," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 59, pages 230-232, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Zhao & Anton Grafström, 2020. "A sample coordination method to monitor totals of environmental variables," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), September.
    2. B. L. Robertson & O. Ozturk & O. Kravchuk & J. A. Brown, 2022. "Spatially Balanced Sampling with Local Ranking," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 622-639, December.
    3. Omer Ozturk & Olena Kravchuk, 2021. "Judgment Post-stratified Assessment Combining Ranking Information from Multiple Sources, with a Field Phenotyping Example," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 329-348, September.
    4. Robertson, B.L. & Reale, M. & Price, C.J. & Brown, J.A., 2021. "Quasi-random ranked set sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Omer Ozturk & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "Exact two-sample nonparametric test for quantile difference between two populations based on ranked set samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(1), pages 235-249, March.
    6. Naif Alotaibi & A. S. Al-Moisheer & Ibrahim Elbatal & Mansour Shrahili & Mohammed Elgarhy & Ehab M. Almetwally, 2023. "Half Logistic Inverted Nadarajah–Haghighi Distribution under Ranked Set Sampling with Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1, April.
    7. Jinguo Gao & Omer Ozturk, 2017. "Rank regression in order restricted randomised designs," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 231-257, April.
    8. Juan Manuel Pérez-Salamero González & Marta Regúlez-Castillo & Carlos Vidal-Meliá, 2017. "The continuous sample of working lives: improving its representativeness," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 43-95, March.
    9. Raphaël Jauslin & Bardia Panahbehagh & Yves Tillé, 2022. "Sequential spatially balanced sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), December.
    10. Omer Ozturk, 2019. "Two-stage cluster samples with ranked set sampling designs," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(1), pages 63-91, February.
    11. Manal M. Yousef & Amal S. Hassan & Abdullah H. Al-Nefaie & Ehab M. Almetwally & Hisham M. Almongy, 2022. "Bayesian Estimation Using MCMC Method of System Reliability for Inverted Topp–Leone Distribution Based on Ranked Set Sampling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Al-Saleh, Mohammad Fraiwan & Samuh, Monjed Hisham, 2008. "On multistage ranked set sampling for distribution and median estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2066-2078, January.
    13. Jesse Frey & Timothy G. Feeman, 2017. "Efficiency comparisons for partially rank-ordered set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1149-1163, December.
    14. Gao, Jinguo & Ozturk, Omer, 2012. "Two sample distribution-free inference based on partially rank-ordered set samples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(5), pages 876-884.
    15. Omer Ozturk & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "An Exact Control-Versus-Treatment Comparison Test Based on Ranked Set Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1213-1222, December.
    16. Juan Du & Steven N. MacEachern, 2008. "Judgement Post-Stratification for Designed Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 345-354, June.
    17. Xinlei Wang & Johan Lim & Seung-Jean Kim & Kyu Hahn, 2015. "Estimating cell probabilities in contingency tables with constraints on marginals/conditionals by geometric programming with applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 107-129, March.
    18. Frey, Jesse & Wang, Le, 2013. "Most powerful rank tests for perfect rankings," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 157-168.
    19. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2021. "Unconventional Monetary Policy and Wealth Inequalities in Great Britain," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(1), pages 115-175, February.
    20. Robertson, B.L. & McDonald, T. & Price, C.J. & Brown, J.A., 2017. "A modification of balanced acceptance sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 107-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:27:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s13253-022-00504-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.