IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v24y2019i1d10.1007_s13253-018-00340-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Integer Calibration Weights for Census of Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Sartore

    (National Institute of Statistical Sciences
    USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service)

  • Kelly Toppin

    (USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service)

  • Linda Young

    (USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service)

  • Clifford Spiegelman

    (USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service
    Texas A&M University)

Abstract

When conducting a national survey or census, administrative data may be available that can provide reliable values for some of the variables. Survey and census estimates should be consistent with reliable administrative data. Calibration can be used to improve the estimates by further adjusting the survey weights so that estimates of targeted variables honor bounds obtained from administrative data. The commonly used methods of calibration produce non-integer weights. For the Census of Agriculture, estimates of farms are provided as integers so as to insure consistent estimates at all aggregation levels; thus, the calibrated weights are rounded to integers. The calibration and rounding procedure used for the 2012 Census of Agricultural produced final weights that were substantially different from the survey weights that had been adjusted for under-coverage, non-response, and misclassification. A new method that calibrates and rounds as a single process is provided. The new method produces integer, calibrated weights that tend to be consistent with more calibration targets and are more correlated with the modeled census weights. In addition, the new method is more computationally efficient. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Sartore & Kelly Toppin & Linda Young & Clifford Spiegelman, 2019. "Developing Integer Calibration Weights for Census of Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(1), pages 26-48, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:24:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-018-00340-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-018-00340-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-018-00340-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-018-00340-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antal, Erika & Tillé, Yves, 2011. "A Direct Bootstrap Method for Complex Sampling Designs From a Finite Population," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 534-543.
    2. repec:ags:unassr:235089 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. O'Donoghue, Erik J. & Hoppe, Robert A. & Banker, David E. & Korb, Penni, 2009. "Exploring Alternative Farm Definitions: Implications for Agricultural Statistics and Program Eligibility," Economic Information Bulletin 291954, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Song Xi Chen & Cheng Yong Tang, 2011. "Properties of Census Dual System Population Size Estimators," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 79(3), pages 336-361, December.
    5. Scholetzky, Wendy, 2000. "Evaluation of Integer Weighting for the 1997 Census of Agriculture," NASS Research Reports 234371, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    6. repec:ags:unassr:234371 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Kott, Phillip S., 2001. "Using the Delete-a-Group Jackknife Variance Estimator in NASS Surveys," NASS Research Reports 235089, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    8. Linda J. Young & Andrea C. Lamas & Denise A. Abreu, 2017. "The 2012 Census of Agriculture: A Capture–Recapture Analysis," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 523-539, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brittney Goodrich & Marieke Fenton & Jerrod Penn & John Bovay & Travis Mountain, 2023. "Battling bots: Experiences and strategies to mitigate fraudulent responses in online surveys," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 762-784, June.
    2. Penn, Jerrod & Hu, Wuyang & Alfaro-Inocente, Adriana & Bastola, Sapana, 2020. "Payment versus Charitable Donations to Attract Producer Survey Participation," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304329, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrico Fabrizi & Caterina Giusti & Nicola Salvati & Nikos Tzavidis, 2014. "Mapping average equivalized income using robust small area methods," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 685-701, August.
    2. Wayne A. Fuller & Jason C. Legg & Yang Li, 2017. "Bootstrap Variance Estimation for Rejective Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(520), pages 1562-1570, October.
    3. Lambert, Dayton M. & Sullivan, Patrick, 2006. "Conservation Reserve Program Participation and Acreage Enrollment of Working Farms," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21361, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Dong, Fengxia & Mitchell, Paul D., 2023. "Economic and risk analysis of sustainable practice adoption among U.S. corn growers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Sayed A. Mostafa & Ibrahim A. Ahmad, 2021. "Kernel Density Estimation Based on the Distinct Units in Sampling with Replacement," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 507-547, November.
    6. Zhao, Puying & Haziza, David & Wu, Changbao, 2020. "Survey weighted estimating equation inference with nuisance functionals," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 516-536.
    7. Parcel Joshua D. & Schroeter John R. & Azzam Azzeddine M, 2017. "A Re-Examination of Multistage Economies in Hog Farming," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Pier Luigi Conti & Alberto Iorio & Alessio Guandalini & Daniela Marella & Paola Vicard & Vincenzina Vitale, 2020. "On the estimation of the Lorenz curve under complex sampling designs," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 29(1), pages 1-24, March.
    9. MacDonald, James M. & Hoppe, Robert A. & Newton, Doris, 2018. "Three Decades of Consolidation in U.S. Agriculture," Economic Information Bulletin 276247, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Zhonglei Wang & Liuhua Peng & Jae Kwang Kim, 2022. "Bootstrap inference for the finite population mean under complex sampling designs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1150-1174, September.
    11. Lu Chen & Luca Sartore & Habtamu Benecha & Valbona Bejleri & Balgobin Nandram, 2022. "Smoothing County-Level Sampling Variances to Improve Small Area Models’ Outputs," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Kenneth Poon & Alfons Weersink, 2011. "Factors affecting variability in farm and off‐farm income," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 71(3), pages 379-397, November.
    13. Musser, Wesley N. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Daberkow, Stan G., 2006. "Factors Affecting Direct and Indirect Energy Use in U.S. Corn Production," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21063, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Sixia Chen & David Haziza & Zeinab Mashreghi, 2022. "A Comparison of Existing Bootstrap Algorithms for Multi-Stage Sampling Designs," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Michal Brzezinski, 2014. "Statistical inference for richness measures," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 1599-1608, May.
    16. Alessio Guandalini, 2022. "Things you should know about the Gini index," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 76(4), pages 4-12, October-D.
    17. White, T. Kirk & Hoppe, Robert A., 2012. "Changing Farm Structure and the Distribution of Farm Payments and Federal Crop Insurance," Economic Information Bulletin 120309, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. J. A. Mayor-Gallego & J. L. Moreno-Rebollo & M. D. Jiménez-Gamero, 2019. "Estimation of the finite population distribution function using a global penalized calibration method," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(1), pages 1-35, March.
    19. Eilya Torshizian & Arthur Grimes, 2021. "Household Crowding Measures: A Comparison and External Test of Validity," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1925-1951, April.
    20. Minegishi, Kota & Mieno, Taro, 2020. "Gold in Them Tha-R Hills: A Review of R Packages for Exploratory Data Analysis," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2(3), July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:24:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-018-00340-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.