IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v63y2018i5d10.1007_s00038-018-1107-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attendance to cervical cancer screening among Roma and non-Roma women living in North-Western region of Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Trude Andreassen

    (Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research
    University of Oslo
    University of Oslo)

  • Adriana Melnic

    (The Romanian Cancer Society)

  • Rejane Figueiredo

    (Folkhälsan Research Center, Genetic Epidemiology Group)

  • Kåre Moen

    (University of Oslo)

  • Ofelia Şuteu

    (University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Iuliu Haţieganu”
    Institute of Oncology “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă” Cluj-Napoca (IOCN))

  • Florian Nicula

    (Institute of Oncology “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă” Cluj-Napoca (IOCN))

  • Giske Ursin

    (Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research
    University of Oslo
    University of Southern California)

  • Elisabete Weiderpass

    (Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research
    Folkhälsan Research Center, Genetic Epidemiology Group
    University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway
    Karolinska Institutet)

Abstract

Objectives Romania has Europe’s highest incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer. Participation in the national cervical cancer-screening programme is low, especially among minority Roma women. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study, using a structured questionnaire aiming to quantify reasons for screening attendance among women in North-Western region of Romania. Results 980 women were enrolled in this study. Data were analysed using logistic regression, estimating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). This study revealed that Roma women (46%) attended screening less frequently that non-Roma women (63%),; however, ethnicity in itself was not associated with screening attendance. Instead we found that attendance to the cervical cancer screening programme was determined by having ever heard about a screening opportunity (OR 5.90, 95% CI 3.76−9.27) and having three or more sex partners (OR 5.99, 95% CI 1.71–21.04). Conclusions We concluded that information about the screening programme’s existence and its rationale does not reach the women targeted for screening sufficiently and argue that a process of user involvement aiming to build contact, interaction and cooperation between the programme and its potential participants is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Trude Andreassen & Adriana Melnic & Rejane Figueiredo & Kåre Moen & Ofelia Şuteu & Florian Nicula & Giske Ursin & Elisabete Weiderpass, 2018. "Attendance to cervical cancer screening among Roma and non-Roma women living in North-Western region of Romania," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(5), pages 609-619, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:63:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s00038-018-1107-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-018-1107-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00038-018-1107-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-018-1107-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Freitas, Cláudia & Martin, Graham, 2015. "Inclusive public participation in health: Policy, practice and theoretical contributions to promote the involvement of marginalised groups in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 31-39.
    2. Irina Todorova & Adriana Baban & Anna Alexandrova-Karamanova & Janet Bradley, 2009. "Inequalities in cervical cancer screening in Eastern Europe: perspectives from Bulgaria and Romania," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(4), pages 222-232, August.
    3. Jepson, Ruth Gillian & Hewison, Jenny & Thompson, Andrew & Weller, David, 2007. "Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: A qualitative study in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 890-899, September.
    4. Eardley, Anne & Elkind, Andrea Knopf & Spencer, Brenda & Hobbs, Patricia & Pendleton, Laura L. & Haran, Dave, 1985. "Attendance for cervical screening--Whose problem?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(9), pages 955-962, January.
    5. Rutter, Deborah & Manley, Catherine & Weaver, Tim & Crawford, Mike J. & Fulop, Naomi, 2004. "Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(10), pages 1973-1984, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marisa Usera-Clavero & Diana Gil-González & Daniel La Parra-Casado & Carmen Vives-Cases & Pilar Carrasco-Garrido & Pablo Caballero, 2020. "Inequalities in the use of gynecological visits and preventive services for breast and cervical cancer in Roma women in Spain," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(3), pages 273-280, April.
    2. Anna Gottschlich & Pamela Ochoa & Alvaro Rivera-Andrade & Christian S. Alvarez & Carlos Mendoza Montano & Claudia Camel & Rafael Meza, 2020. "Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Guatemala: a quantitative analysis using data from the Guatemala Demographic and Health Surveys," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(2), pages 217-226, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreassen, Trude & Weiderpass, Elisabete & Nicula, Florian & Suteu, Ofelia & Itu, Andreea & Bumbu, Minodora & Tincu, Aida & Ursin, Giske & Moen, Kåre, 2017. "Controversies about cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of Roma women's (non)participation in cervical cancer screening in Romania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 48-55.
    2. Haldane, Victoria & Singh, Shweta R. & Srivastava, Aastha & Chuah, Fiona L.H. & Koh, Gerald C.H. & Chia, Kee Seng & Perel, Pablo & Legido-Quigley, Helena, 2020. "Community involvement in the development and implementation of chronic condition programmes across the continuum of care in high- and upper-middle income countries: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 419-437.
    3. Lydia Lewis, 2014. "User Involvement in Mental Health Services: A Case of Power over Discourse," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Chapple, Alison & Ziebland, Sue & Hewitson, Paul & McPherson, Ann, 2008. "What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2425-2435, June.
    5. Lorenza Magliano & Andrea Fiorillo & Heidegret Del Vecchio & Claudio Malangone & Corrado De Rosa & Carla Bachelet & Giampiero Cesari & Rosa D'Ambrogio & Francesca Fulgosi Cigala & Franco Veltro & Paol, 2009. "Development and Validation of a Self-Reported Questionnaire On Users’ Opinions About Schizophrenia: a Participatory Research," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(5), pages 425-441, September.
    6. Raluca Dania Todor & Gabriel Bratucu & Marius Alexandru Moga & Adina Nicoleta Candrea & Luigi Geo Marceanu & Costin Vlad Anastasiu, 2021. "Challenges in the Prevention of Cervical Cancer in Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Diana Rose & Pete Fleischmann & Peter Schofield, 2010. "Perceptions of User Involvement: a User-Led Study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(4), pages 389-401, July.
    8. Martin, Graham P., 2008. "Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1757-1765, December.
    9. Aveling, Emma-Louise & Martin, Graham, 2013. "Realising the transformative potential of healthcare partnerships: Insights from divergent literatures and contrasting cases in high- and low-income country contexts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 74-82.
    10. Valentine, Kylie, 2010. "A consideration of medicalisation: Choice, engagement and other responsibilities of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 950-957, September.
    11. Marianne Storm & Kjell Hausken & Knud Knudsen, 2011. "Inpatient service providers’ perspectives on service user involvement in Norwegian community mental health centres," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(6), pages 551-563, November.
    12. Tonya Moen Hansen & Knut Stavem & Kim Rand, 2023. "Completing the time trade-off with respondents who are older, in poorer health or with an immigrant background in an EQ-5D-5L valuation study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(6), pages 877-884, August.
    13. de Freitas, Cláudia & Martin, Graham, 2015. "Inclusive public participation in health: Policy, practice and theoretical contributions to promote the involvement of marginalised groups in healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 31-39.
    14. Laura Chisholm & Sue Holttum & Neil Springham, 2018. "Processes in an Experience-Based Co-Design Project With Family Carers in Community Mental Health," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    15. Daniela E. Miranda & Manuel Garcia-Ramirez & Fabricio E. Balcazar & Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar, 2019. "A Community-Based Participatory Action Research for Roma Health Justice in a Deprived District in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Barigozzi, Francesca & Levaggi, Rosella, 2008. "Emotions in physician agency," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Croft, Charlotte & Currie, Graeme & Staniszewska, Sophie, 2016. "Moving from rational to normative ideologies of control over public involvement: A case of continued managerial dominance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 124-132.
    18. Maria Goddard & Peter Smith, 1998. "Equity of access to health care," Working Papers 032cheop, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    19. Escobar-Ballesta, M. & García-Ramírez, M. & De Freitas, C., 2018. "Taking stock of Roma health policies in Spain: Lessons for health governance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(4), pages 444-451.
    20. Kirstin Scott & John Powles & Hilary Thomas & Boika Rechel, 2011. "Perceived barriers to the development of modern public health in Bulgaria: a qualitative study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(2), pages 191-199, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:63:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s00038-018-1107-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.