IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ieaple/v21y2021i4d10.1007_s10784-021-09540-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

China's policy and finding ways to prevent collapse in WEEE processing in the context of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal

Author

Listed:
  • Qinrun Zhang

    (Shandong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Based on the generally accepted view that the issues of climate change and the consequences of environmental pollution have no boundaries, the question of how countries are able to negotiate is of particular importance. After China's refusal to import e-waste, the environmental agenda of importing countries increasingly shares an opinion about the need to find alternatives for the disposal of this kind of waste. However, the question of how quickly such alternative solutions can be implemented, and whether such a delay contributes to the excess accumulation of waste remains open. In this regard, the research question is defined as follows: what challenges does the existing policy of China create for exporting countries and China itself with regard to WEEE exports and whether the scenario of returning to the previous model of import–export interaction between China and exporter-states is acceptable? To study these issues, the work uses the method of political and legal analysis, as well as the method of case study. The article suggests that today the role of China is uncontested, since today the level of production of electronic and electrical equipment significantly exceeds the volume of WEEE. At the same time, the number of existing facilities and personnel of companies involved in the processing of WEEE is critically out of proportion to the growing volume of waste. In the context of the applicability of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, the study examines the reasons for China's refusal to import WEEE, as well as perspective areas of legislative regulation of China in the field of handling WEEE. The study and assessment of the prospects for legal regulation in this area in China against the background of global initiatives determines the purpose of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinrun Zhang, 2021. "China's policy and finding ways to prevent collapse in WEEE processing in the context of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 693-710, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:21:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-021-09540-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10784-021-09540-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10784-021-09540-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10784-021-09540-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 2020. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 393-410, June.
    2. Nnorom, I.C. & Osibanjo, O., 2008. "Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 843-858.
    3. Gökçe Esenduran & Atalay Atasu & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2019. "Valuable e-waste: Implications for extended producer responsibility," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 382-396, April.
    4. Shumail Mazahir & Vedat Verter & Tamer Boyaci & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2019. "Did Europe Move in the Right Direction on E‐waste Legislation?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(1), pages 121-139, January.
    5. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 0. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    6. Kamran Rousta & Karin M. Ekström, 2013. "Assessing Incorrect Household Waste Sorting in a Medium-Sized Swedish City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gulzhazira Ilyassova & Aigul Nukusheva & Leila Arenova & Guldana Karzhassova & Marzhangul Akimzhanova, 2021. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prospects of legal regulation in the field of electronic waste management in the context of a circular economy," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 367-388, September.
    2. Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Reis, Tiago N.P. dos, 2021. "Maldevelopment revisited: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion over Brazil’s Cerrado in Matopiba," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Chen, Yuyu & Li, Bangyi & Zhang, Guoqing & Bai, Qingguo, 2020. "Quantity and collection decisions of the remanufacturing enterprise under both the take-back and carbon emission capacity regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Yue Wang & Baoying Xin & Zhe Wang & Bangyi Li, 2019. "Managing Supplier-Manufacturer Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Product Design and Take-Back Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Xu, Jie & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2021. "Remanufacturing strategies under product take-back regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Joyeeta Gupta & Aarti Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2022. "Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 393-409, June.
    9. Caiado, Nathália & Guarnieri, Patricia & Xavier, Lúcia Helena & de Lorena Diniz Chaves, Gisele, 2017. "A characterization of the Brazilian market of reverse logistic credits (RLC) and an analogy with the existing carbon credit market," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 47-59.
    10. Asuncion Arner Guerre, 2022. "The Extended Producer Responsibility for Waste Oils," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 210-217, March.
    11. Agni Kalfagianni & Oran R. Young, 2022. "The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 245-262, June.
    12. Mallawarachchi, Harshani & Karunasena, Gayani, 2012. "Electronic and electrical waste management in Sri Lanka: Suggestions for national policy enhancements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 44-53.
    13. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    14. Umair, Shakila & Björklund, Anna & Petersen, Elisabeth Ekener, 2015. "Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using UNEP SETAC guidelines," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 46-57.
    15. Shraddha Mishra & Surya Prakash Singh, 2022. "Designing dynamic reverse logistics network for post-sale service," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 89-118, March.
    16. Abhishek Nandan & Albin C. Suresh & Parth Saole & S. Amulya Jeevanasai & Ramprasad Chandrasekaran & Lucas Meili & Nur Izyan Wan Azelee & Rangabhashiyam Selvasembian, 2023. "An Integrated Approach for Electronic Waste Management—Overview of Sources of Generation, Toxicological Effects, Assessment, Governance, and Mitigation Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Babak Nemat & Mohammad Razzaghi & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2023. "Design-Based Approach to Support Sorting Behavior of Food Packaging," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-32, February.
    18. Morvarid Rahmani & Luyi Gui & Atalay Atasu, 2021. "The Implications of Recycling Technology Choice on Extended Producer Responsibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 522-542, February.
    19. Saurabh P. Tembhare & Bharat A. Bhanvase & Divya P. Barai & Sanjay J. Dhoble, 2022. "E-waste recycling practices: a review on environmental concerns, remediation and technological developments with a focus on printed circuit boards," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 8965-9047, July.
    20. Qi Feng & Chengzhang Li & Mengshi Lu & J. George Shanthikumar, 2022. "Implementing Environmental and Social Responsibility Programs in Supply Networks Through Multiunit Bilateral Negotiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2579-2599, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:21:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-021-09540-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.