IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/flsman/v32y2020i2d10.1007_s10696-019-09370-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Switching- and hedging- point policy for preventive maintenance with degrading machines: application to a two-machine line

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Chiara Magnanini

    (Politecnico di Milano)

  • Tullio Tolio

    (Politecnico di Milano)

Abstract

Maintenance and production are frequently managed as separate activities although they do interact. Disruptive events such as machine failures may find the company unready to repair the machine immediately leading to time waste. Preventive Maintenance may be carried out and maintenance time reduced to the effective task duration, in order to prevent time waste. Companies and researchers have been focusing on policies able to mitigate the impact of Preventive Maintenance on system availability, by exploiting the knowledge about degradation profiles in machines and the joint information from the machine state and the buffer level. In this work, the mathematical proof of the optimal threshold-based control policy for Preventive Maintenance with inventory cost, maintenance cost, backlog cost is provided. The control policy is defined in terms of buffer thresholds and dependency of the thresholds on the degradation condition. The optimal control policy is proved to include a combination of switching points and hedging points, where the first ones activate the Preventive Maintenance for a given condition and the latter ones control the production rate in order to minimize the surplus. An extensive experimental campaign analyzes the impact of system parameters such as the Maintenance duration on the cost function. The results show that there exists cases in which the optimal policy is dominated by the effect of the hedging points or the switching points, alternatively. Therefore, the proposed method is used to provide suggestions to the management for operative decisions, in order to choose the policy fitting best the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Chiara Magnanini & Tullio Tolio, 2020. "Switching- and hedging- point policy for preventive maintenance with degrading machines: application to a two-machine line," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 241-271, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:32:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10696-019-09370-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10696-019-09370-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10696-019-09370-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10696-019-09370-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Meller, Russell D. & Kim, David S., 1996. "The impact of preventive maintenance on system cost and buffer size," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 577-591, December.
    3. Swanson, Laura, 2001. "Linking maintenance strategies to performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 237-244, April.
    4. Richard Barlow & Larry Hunter, 1960. "Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 90-100, February.
    5. Fitouhi, Mohamed-Chahir & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Gershwin, Stanley B., 2017. "Performance evaluation of a two-machine line with a finite buffer and condition-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 61-72.
    6. Chen, Dongyan & Trivedi, Kishor S., 2005. "Optimization for condition-based maintenance with semi-Markov decision process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 25-29.
    7. Aghezzaf, E.H. & Jamali, M.A. & Ait-Kadi, D., 2007. "An integrated production and preventive maintenance planning model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 679-685, September.
    8. Richard Conway & William Maxwell & John O. McClain & L. Joseph Thomas, 1988. "The Role of Work-in-Process Inventory in Serial Production Lines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 229-241, April.
    9. Harry Groenevelt & Liliane Pintelon & Abraham Seidmann, 1992. "Production Lot Sizing with Machine Breakdowns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 104-123, January.
    10. Ciriaco Valdez‐Flores & Richard M. Feldman, 1989. "A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single‐unit systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 419-446, August.
    11. Papadopoulos, H. T. & Heavey, C., 1996. "Queueing theory in manufacturing systems analysis and design: A classification of models for production and transfer lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 1-27, July.
    12. Scarf, Philip A., 1997. "On the application of mathematical models in maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 493-506, June.
    13. Saumil Ambani & Semyon Meerkov & Liang Zhang, 2010. "Feasibility and optimization of preventive maintenance in exponential machines and serial lines," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 766-777.
    14. Kyriakidis, E.G. & Dimitrakos, T.D., 2006. "Optimal preventive maintenance of a production system with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 86-99, January.
    15. Karamatsoukis, C.C. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2010. "Optimal maintenance of two stochastically deteriorating machines with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 297-308, November.
    16. William P. Pierskalla & John A. Voelker, 1976. "A survey of maintenance models: The control and surveillance of deteriorating systems," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 353-388, September.
    17. Song, Dong-Ping, 2009. "Production and preventive maintenance control in a stochastic manufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 101-111, May.
    18. Van der Duyn Schouten, F. A. & Vanneste, S. G., 1995. "Maintenance optimization of a production system with buffer capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 323-338, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Behnamfar, Reza & Sajadi, Seyed Mojtaba & Tootoonchy, Mahshid, 2022. "Developing environmental hedging point policy with variable demand: A machine learning approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    2. Xinlong Li & Yan Ran & Fangming Wan & Hui Yu & Genbao Zhang & Yan He, 2022. "Condition-based maintenance strategy optimization of meta-action unit considering imperfect preventive maintenance based on Wiener process," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 204-233, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kiesmüller, G.P. & Sachs, F.E., 2020. "Spare parts or buffer? How to design a transfer line with unreliable machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 121-134.
    2. Dimitrakos, T.D. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2008. "A semi-Markov decision algorithm for the maintenance of a production system with buffer capacity and continuous repair times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 752-762, February.
    3. Karamatsoukis, C.C. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2010. "Optimal maintenance of two stochastically deteriorating machines with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 297-308, November.
    4. Lisa M. Maillart & Xiang Fang, 2006. "Optimal maintenance policies for serial, multi‐machine systems with non‐instantaneous repairs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(8), pages 804-813, December.
    5. Thomas Sloan, 2008. "Simultaneous determination of production and maintenance schedules using in‐line equipment condition and yield information," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 116-129, March.
    6. Zhang, Ning & Qi, Faqun & Zhang, Chengjie & Zhou, Hongming, 2022. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance policy and buffer capacity for a two-unit series system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    7. Sachs, F.E. & Helber, S. & Kiesmüller, G.P., 2022. "Evaluation of Unreliable Flow Lines with Limited Buffer Capacities and Spare Part Provisioning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 544-559.
    8. Shuyuan Gan & Bolun Wang & Zhifang Song, 2021. "A Combined Maintenance Strategy Considering Spares, Buffer, and Quality," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 431-445, June.
    9. Guo R. & Ascher H. & Love E., 2001. "Towards Practical and Synthetical Modelling of Repairable Systems," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 147-182, January.
    10. Dehayem Nodem, F.I. & Kenné, J.P. & Gharbi, A., 2011. "Simultaneous control of production, repair/replacement and preventive maintenance of deteriorating manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 271-282, November.
    11. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    12. Ribeiro, M.A. & Silveira, J.L. & Qassim, R.Y., 2007. "Joint optimisation of maintenance and buffer size in a manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 405-413, January.
    13. Zequeira, Romulo I. & Valdes, Jose E. & Berenguer, Christophe, 2008. "Optimal buffer inventory and opportunistic preventive maintenance under random production capacity availability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 686-696, February.
    14. Peng, Hao & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2016. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance and production lot-sizing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 94-107.
    15. Chelbi, Anis & Ait-Kadi, Daoud, 2004. "Analysis of a production/inventory system with randomly failing production unit submitted to regular preventive maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 712-718, August.
    16. Kyriakidis, E.G. & Dimitrakos, T.D., 2006. "Optimal preventive maintenance of a production system with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 86-99, January.
    17. Meller, Russell D. & Kim, David S., 1996. "The impact of preventive maintenance on system cost and buffer size," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 577-591, December.
    18. Zhou, Yifan & Guo, Yiming & Lin, Tian Ran & Ma, Lin, 2018. "Maintenance optimisation of a series production system with intermediate buffers using a multi-agent FMDP," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 39-48.
    19. Budai-Balke, G. & Dekker, R. & Nicolai, R.P., 2006. "A review of planning models for maintenance and production," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2006-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    20. Wee, Hui Ming & Widyadana, Gede Agus, 2013. "Single-vendor single-buyer inventory model with discrete delivery order, random machine unavailability time and lost sales," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 574-579.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:flsman:v:32:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10696-019-09370-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.