IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v22y2021i7d10.1007_s10198-021-01307-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing measurement properties of two EQ-5D youth versions and KIDSCREEN-10 in China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang Pei

    (Fudan University)

  • Sun Yue

    (Fudan University)

  • Yang Zhi-Hao

    (Jinan University)

  • Zhang Ruo-Yu

    (Fudan University)

  • Wu Bin

    (Shanghai Jiaotong University)

  • Luo Nan

    (National University of Singapore)

Abstract

Objective To assess measurement properties of the two youth versions of EQ-5D (i.e., 5-level EQ-5D-Y [Y-5L] and 3-level EQ-5D-Y [Y-3L]) and KIDSCREEN-10 in China. Methods Children and adolescents attending schools in Shanghai, China were recruited to self-complete the Y-5L, KIDSCREEN-10, and Y-3L questionnaires. Their feasibility was assessed according to missing responses. Convergent validity of the EQ-5D-Y dimensions, a summated dimension score [SDS], and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were assessed by examining their correlations with the KIDSCREEN-10 index score and dimensions. Known-groups validity of SDS, VAS, and KIDSCREEN-10 index score were tested by comparing the scores of pupils with and without two conditions (i.e., overweight and shortsightedness), and the relative efficiency (RE) between them was also evaluated. Results A total of 262 pupils (girl: 58.4%; mean age: 12.7 years) were enrolled. Missing responses were low for both the Y-5L (0.3%) and Y-3L (2.4%), and KIDSCREEN-10 (0.3%). The overall ceiling effects were 40.3% for the Y-5L, 44.1% for the Y-3L and 1.1% for the KIDSCREEN-10. The SDSY-5L, SDSY-3L and VAS were moderately correlated with the KIDSCREEN-10 index score (|r|= 0.425 for SDSY-5L, 0.323 for SDSY-3L, and 0.435 for VAS; p 0.3). Both the SDSY-5L and SDSY-3L had lower values, and VAS and KIDSCREEN-10 index score had higher values for pupils without shortsightedness compared with those for their counterparts. The difference was statistical significance for the SDSY-5L and VAS (P

Suggested Citation

  • Wang Pei & Sun Yue & Yang Zhi-Hao & Zhang Ruo-Yu & Wu Bin & Luo Nan, 2021. "Testing measurement properties of two EQ-5D youth versions and KIDSCREEN-10 in China," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(7), pages 1083-1093, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:22:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01307-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01307-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-021-01307-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-021-01307-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Lee-Yin Tan & Zhihao Yang & Ataru Igarashi & Michael Herdman & Nan Luo, 2021. "How Do Respondents Interpret and View the EQ-VAS? A Qualitative Study of Three Asian Populations," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(2), pages 283-293, March.
    2. Michael Erhart & Veronika Ottova & Tanja Gaspar & Helena Jericek & Christina Schnohr & Mujgan Alikasifoglu & Antony Morgan & Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, 2009. "Measuring mental health and well-being of school-children in 15 European countries using the KIDSCREEN-10 Index," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(2), pages 160-166, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel A. Perez-Sousa & Pedro R. Olivares & Narcis Gusi, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Versions of EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in Children with Cancer: A Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-9, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Clercq, B. & Vyncke, V. & Hublet, A. & Elgar, F.J. & Ravens-Sieberer, U. & Currie, C. & Hooghe, M. & Ieven, A. & Maes, L., 2012. "Social capital and social inequality in adolescents’ health in 601 Flemish communities: A multilevel analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 202-210.
    2. Wenjing Zhou & Anle Shen & Zhihao Yang & Pei Wang & Bin Wu & Michael Herdman & Nan Luo, 2021. "Patient-caregiver agreement and test–retest reliability of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric patients with haematological malignancies," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(7), pages 1103-1113, September.
    3. Sabolova, Klara & Birdsey, Nicola & Stuart-Hamilton, Ian & Cousins, Alecia L., 2020. "A cross-cultural exploration of children’s perceptions of wellbeing: Understanding protective and risk factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Laura Stöcklin & Georg Loss & Erika Mutius & Juliane Weber & Jon Genuneit & Elisabeth Horak & Barbara Sozanska & Hanna Danielewicz & Paul Cullinan & Dick Heederick & Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer, 2013. "Health-related quality of life in rural children living in four European countries: the GABRIEL study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(3), pages 355-366, June.
    5. Paulo Moreira & Susana Pedras & Márcia Silva & Maria Moreira & Joana Oliveira, 2021. "Personality, Attachment, and Well-Being in Adolescents: The Independent Effect of Attachment After Controlling for Personality," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1855-1888, April.
    6. Christiane Otto & Anne-Catherine Haller & Fionna Klasen & Heike Hölling & Monika Bullinger & Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer & on behalf of the BELLA study group, 2017. "Risk and protective factors of health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: Results of the longitudinal BELLA study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Katrina Lloyd & Lesley Emerson, 2017. "(Re)examining the Relationship Between Children’s Subjective Wellbeing and Their Perceptions of Participation Rights," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 10(3), pages 591-608, September.
    8. Jenny Davison & Brendan Bunting & Paul Connolly & Katrina Lloyd & Laura Dunne & Barbara Stewart-Knox, 2022. "Less Screen Time, More Frequent Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Physical Activity are Associated with Greater Mental Wellbeing in Adolescents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(4), pages 1339-1361, August.
    9. Johanna W. Hoefnagels & Annelieke B. Schoen & Sabine E. I. van der Laan & Lyan H. Rodijk & Cornelis K. van der Ent & Elise M. van de Putte & Geertje W. Dalmeijer & Sanne L. Nijhof, 2022. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Mental Wellbeing in Children with a Chronic Condition Compared to Healthy Peers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, March.
    10. Veronika Ottova & Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, 2010. "Social determinants in child health: reflections from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(6), pages 525-526, December.
    11. Jose A. Piqueras & Tiscar Rodriguez-Jimenez & Juan Carlos Marzo & Maria Rivera-Riquelme & Agustin E. Martinez-Gonzalez & Raquel Falco & Michael J. Furlong, 2019. "Social Emotional Health Survey-Secondary (SEHS-S): A Universal Screening Measure of Social-Emotional Strengths for Spanish-Speaking Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:22:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-021-01307-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.