IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i1d10.1007_s10668-021-01496-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social innovation ecosystems and sustainability in cities: a study in Florianópolis, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Carolina Andion

    (State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC)
    State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC))

  • Graziela Dias Alperstedt

    (State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC))

  • Julia Furlanetto Graeff

    (State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC))

  • Luciana Ronconi

    (State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC))

Abstract

The socio-environmental crisis and the complexity of urban problems highlight the importance of better understanding the emergence and configuration of social innovation ecosystems (SIEs) and their impact on cities. This article proposes a new theoretical–methodological approach that is inspired in a pragmatism perspective and presents results of its empirical application in the mapping and analysis of the SIE in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. The study was put into practice through the creation and implementation of a collaborative digital platform that made it possible to make a cartography of the network that forms the city’s SIE, shedding light on the linkage between micro-meso-macro-scales of SIEs. The research findings contribute to raising key aspects in each scale of SIE that could foster or hinder social innovation dynamics. In this sense, besides contributing to understanding the dynamics of SIEs better, the purpose of this study was to analyze the configuration, scope, and limits of the SIE to reinforce the processes of democratic experimentation and to strengthen the sustainability of cities, especially in countries of the South, where these studies are still scarce.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolina Andion & Graziela Dias Alperstedt & Julia Furlanetto Graeff & Luciana Ronconi, 2022. "Social innovation ecosystems and sustainability in cities: a study in Florianópolis, Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1259-1281, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01496-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01496-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01496-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01496-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abid Mehmood, 2016. "Of resilient places: planning for urban resilience," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 407-419, February.
    2. Jale Tosun & Jonas J. Schoenefeld, 2017. "Collective climate action and networked climate governance," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), January.
    3. Erik Stam, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1759-1769, September.
    4. Graziela Dias Alperstedt & Carolina Andion, 2021. "Social innovation ecosystems: a literature review and insights for a research agenda," Chapters, in: Jürgen Howaldt & Christoph Kaletka & Antonius Schröder (ed.), A Research Agenda for Social Innovation, chapter 9, pages 149-167, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Ansell, Christopher K. & Bartenberger, Martin, 2016. "Varieties of experimentalism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 64-73.
    6. Mike Hodson & Frank W. Geels & Andy McMeekin, 2017. "Reconfiguring Urban Sustainability Transitions, Analysing Multiplicity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Marc Wolfram & Niki Frantzeskaki, 2016. "Cities and Systemic Change for Sustainability: Prevailing Epistemologies and an Emerging Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Frank Moulaert & Farid Sekia, 2003. "Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 289-302.
    9. Judith Terstriep & Dieter Rehfeld & Maria Kleverbeck, 2020. "Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? – An explorative approach," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 881-905, July.
    10. Dmitri Domanski & Jürgen Howaldt & Christoph Kaletka, 2020. "A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 454-474, March.
    11. McPhearson, Timon & Andersson, Erik & Elmqvist, Thomas & Frantzeskaki, Niki, 2015. "Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 152-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuebart, Andreas & Ibert, Oliver, 2019. "Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(2-4), pages 118-133.
    2. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton & Diana Mangalagiu & Jing Lan & Dina Hestad & Elena Apostoli Cappello & Sander Leeuw, 2020. "Co-creation, co-evolution and co-governance: understanding green businesses and urban transformations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 621-636, June.
    4. Anne Maassen & Madeleine Galvin, 2019. "What Does Urban Transformation Look Like? Findings from a Global Prize Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Zhimin Liu & Chunliang Xiu & Wei Song, 2019. "Landscape-Based Assessment of Urban Resilience and Its Evolution: A Case Study of the Central City of Shenyang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Seyed Mohammad Haghighi Fard & Naciye Doratli, 2022. "Evaluation of Resilience in Historic Urban Areas by Combining Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System and GIS, with Sustainability and Regeneration Approach: The Case Study of Tehran (IRAN)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Jonas Mendes Constante & Peter W. Langen & Salvador Furió Pruñonosa, 2023. "Innovation ecosystems in ports: a comparative analysis of Rotterdam and Valencia," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Kathryn Davidson & Lars Coenen & Michele Acuto & Brendan Gleeson, 2019. "Reconfiguring urban governance in an age of rising city networks: A research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3540-3555, December.
    9. Grazia Brunetta & Stefano Salata, 2019. "Mapping Urban Resilience for Spatial Planning—A First Attempt to Measure the Vulnerability of the System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Jonas Torrens & Phillip Johnstone & Johan Schot, 2018. "Unpacking the Formation of Favourable Environments for Urban Experimentation: The Case of the Bristol Energy Scene," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Strambach, Simone & Pflitsch, Gesa, 2020. "Transition topology: Capturing institutional dynamics in regional development paths to sustainability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    12. Ziegler, Rafael & Balzac-Arroyo, Josephine & Hölsgens, Rick & Holzgreve, Sarah & Lyon, Fergus & Spangenberg, Joachim H. & Thapa, Philipp P., 2022. "Social innovation for biodiversity: A literature review and research challenges," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Urmanaviciene Audrone & Kostalova Jana & Baturina Danijel & Krzyworzeka Paweł & Budrytė Paulina & Lepik Katri-Liis, 2022. "Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(s1), pages 381-401, October.
    14. Rehák Štefan & Buček Milan & Hudec Oto, 2013. "Path dependency and path plasticity in emerging industries," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 52-66, October.
    15. Christina Theodoraki & Karim Messeghem & Mark P. Rice, 2018. "A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 153-170, June.
    16. Kanayo K. Ogujiuba & Maria Eggink & Ebenezer Olamide, 2023. "Interaction and Main Effects of Finance Support and Other Business Support Services on the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: A Case Study of the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Adrian Otoiu & Ramona Bere & Catalin Silvestru, 2017. "An Assessment of the First Round Impact of Innovation Industries on Europe’s Regional Economies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 289-289, February.
    18. Andreas Koch & Harald Strotmann, 2006. "Determinants of Innovative Activity in Newly Founded Knowledge Intensive Business Service Firms," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Michael Fritsch & Juergen Schmude (ed.), Entrepreneurship in the Region, chapter 10, pages 195-224, Springer.
    19. Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xipeng Liao, 2024. "Analysis of Domain Intersection and Knowledge Evolution—The Development of the Fields of Social Innovation and Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Dorine Cornet & Jean Bonnet & Sébastien Bourdin, 2023. "Digital entrepreneurship indicator (DEI): an analysis of the case of the greater Paris metropolitan area," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(3), pages 697-724, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01496-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.