IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v31y2021i2d10.1007_s12525-020-00441-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trustworthy artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Thiebes

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

  • Sebastian Lins

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

  • Ali Sunyaev

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) brings forth many opportunities to contribute to the wellbeing of individuals and the advancement of economies and societies, but also a variety of novel ethical, legal, social, and technological challenges. Trustworthy AI (TAI) bases on the idea that trust builds the foundation of societies, economies, and sustainable development, and that individuals, organizations, and societies will therefore only ever be able to realize the full potential of AI, if trust can be established in its development, deployment, and use. With this article we aim to introduce the concept of TAI and its five foundational principles (1) beneficence, (2) non-maleficence, (3) autonomy, (4) justice, and (5) explicability. We further draw on these five principles to develop a data-driven research framework for TAI and demonstrate its utility by delineating fruitful avenues for future research, particularly with regard to the distributed ledger technology-based realization of TAI.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Thiebes & Sebastian Lins & Ali Sunyaev, 2021. "Trustworthy artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 447-464, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12525-020-00441-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam, Martin & Wessel, Michael & Benlian, Alexander, 2020. "AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 119304, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Venkata Marella & Bikesh Upreti & Jani Merikivi & Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen, 2020. "Understanding the creation of trust in cryptocurrencies: the case of Bitcoin," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 259-271, June.
    3. Rachel Courtland, 2018. "Bias detectives: the researchers striving to make algorithms fair," Nature, Nature, vol. 558(7710), pages 357-360, June.
    4. Dorian Selz, 2020. "From electronic markets to data driven insights," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 57-59, March.
    5. Anthony Vance & Christophe M. Elie-Dit-Cosaque & Detmar W. Straub, 2008. "Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture," Post-Print halshs-00641137, HAL.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2723 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Arun Rai, 2020. "Explainable AI: from black box to glass box," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 137-141, January.
    8. Moon Soo Kim & Jee Yong Chung, 2018. "Sustainable Growth and Token Economy Design: The Case of Steemit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    10. Thibault de Swarte & Boufous Omar & Paul Escalle, 2019. "Artificial intelligence, ethics and human values : the cases of military drones and companion robots," Post-Print hal-02277624, HAL.
    11. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Thomas R. Shaw & D. Sandy Staples, 2004. "Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 250-267, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sharifpour Hojatallah & Ghaseminezhad Yaser & Hashemi-Tabatabaei Mohammad & Amiri Maghsoud, 2022. "Investigating cause-and-effect relationships between supply chain 4.0 technologies," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 22-46, December.
    2. Lukas-Valentin Herm & Theresa Steinbach & Jonas Wanner & Christian Janiesch, 2022. "A nascent design theory for explainable intelligent systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2185-2205, December.
    3. Jonas Wanner & Lukas-Valentin Herm & Kai Heinrich & Christian Janiesch, 2022. "The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: Evidence from a user-based study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2079-2102, December.
    4. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Alexandra Brintrup & George Baryannis & Ashutosh Tiwari & Svetan Ratchev & Giovanna Martinez-Arellano & Jatinder Singh, 2023. "Trustworthy, responsible, ethical AI in manufacturing and supply chains: synthesis and emerging research questions," Papers 2305.11581, arXiv.org.
    6. Julia Brasse & Hanna Rebecca Broder & Maximilian Förster & Mathias Klier & Irina Sigler, 2023. "Explainable artificial intelligence in information systems: A review of the status quo and future research directions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Ransome Epie Bawack & Samuel Fosso Wamba & Kevin Daniel André Carillo & Shahriar Akter, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in E-Commerce: a bibliometric study and literature review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 297-338, March.
    8. Aliya Tastemirova & Johannes Schneider & Leona Chandra Kruse & Simon Heinzle & Jan vom Brocke, 2022. "Microexpressions in digital humans: perceived affect, sincerity, and trustworthiness," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1603-1620, September.
    9. Eric K. Clemons & Ravi V. Waran & Sebastian Hermes & Maximilian Schreieck & Helmut Krcmar, 2022. "Computing and Social Welfare," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 417-436, June.
    10. Matti Minkkinen & Markus Philipp Zimmer & Matti Mäntymäki, 2023. "Co-Shaping an Ecosystem for Responsible AI: Five Types of Expectation Work in Response to a Technological Frame," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 103-121, February.
    11. Christian Meske & Babak Abedin & Mathias Klier & Fethi Rabhi, 2022. "Explainable and responsible artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2103-2106, December.
    12. Rodney Duffett & Rodica Milena Zaharia & Tudor Edu & Raluca Constantinescu & Costel Negricea, 2024. "Exploring the Antecedents of Artificial Intelligence Products’ Usage. The Case of Business Students," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 106-106, February.
    13. Md Shajalal & Alexander Boden & Gunnar Stevens, 2022. "Explainable product backorder prediction exploiting CNN: Introducing explainable models in businesses," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2107-2122, December.
    14. Rainer Alt, 2021. "Electronic Markets on digital platforms and AI," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 233-241, June.
    15. Rainer Alt, 2022. "Electronic Markets on AI and standardization," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1795-1805, December.
    16. Jana Gerlach & Paul Hoppe & Sarah Jagels & Luisa Licker & Michael H. Breitner, 2022. "Decision support for efficient XAI services - A morphological analysis, business model archetypes, and a decision tree," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2139-2158, December.
    17. Niklas Kühl & Max Schemmer & Marc Goutier & Gerhard Satzger, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2235-2244, December.
    18. René Riedl, 2022. "Is trust in artificial intelligence systems related to user personality? Review of empirical evidence and future research directions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2021-2051, December.
    19. Milad Mirbabaie & Felix Brünker & Nicholas R. J. Möllmann Frick & Stefan Stieglitz, 2022. "The rise of artificial intelligence – understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 73-99, March.
    20. Pascal Hamm & Michael Klesel & Patricia Coberger & H. Felix Wittmann, 2023. "Explanation matters: An experimental study on explainable AI," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    21. Rongbin Yang & Santoso Wibowo, 2022. "User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2053-2077, December.
    22. Roman Lukyanenko & Wolfgang Maass & Veda C. Storey, 2022. "Trust in artificial intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to emerging research opportunities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1993-2020, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ming Yang & Jinglu Jiang & Melody Kiang & Fangyun Yuan, 2022. "Re-Examining the Impact of Multidimensional Trust on Patients’ Online Medical Consultation Service Continuance Decision," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 983-1007, June.
    2. Wallbach, Sören & Lehner, Roland & Röthke, Konstantin & Elbert, Ralf & Benlian, Alexander, 2020. "Trust-Building Effects of Blockchain Features – An Empirical Analysis of Immutability, Traceability and Anonymity," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 120705, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Wallbach, Sören, 2020. "Assimilation and Diffusion of Multi-Sided Platforms in Dynamic B2B Networks: Inhibiting Factors and Their Consequences," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 123277, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    5. Fernanda Leão Ramos & Jorge Brantes Ferreira & Angilberto Sabino de Freitas & Juliana Werneck Rodrigues, 2018. "The Effect of Trust in the Intention to Use m-banking," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(2), pages 175-191, March.
    6. Jung Lee & Jae-Nam Lee & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "Antecedents of cognitive trust and affective distrust and their mediating roles in building customer loyalty," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-175, February.
    7. Greenberg, Penelope Sue & Greenberg, Ralph H. & Antonucci, Yvonne Lederer, 2007. "Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 325-333.
    8. Bettina Distel & Holger Koelmann & Ralf Plattfaut & Jörg Becker, 2022. "Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 789-818, December.
    9. Nancy K. Lankton & D. Harrison McKnight & Ryan T. Wright & Jason Bennett Thatcher, 2016. "Research Note—Using Expectation Disconfirmation Theory and Polynomial Modeling to Understand Trust in Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 197-213, March.
    10. Chrisanthi Avgerou & Andrea Ganzaroli & Angeliki Poulymenakou & Nicolau Reinhard, 2009. "Interpreting the trustworthiness of government mediated by information and communication technology: lessons from electronic voting in Brazil," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30285, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Tussyadiah, Iis P. & Zach, Florian J. & Wang, Jianxi, 2020. "Do travelers trust intelligent service robots?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Weiquan Wang & May Wang, 2019. "Effects of Sponsorship Disclosure on Perceived Integrity of Biased Recommendation Agents: Psychological Contract Violation and Knowledge-Based Trust Perspectives," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 507-522, June.
    13. Weck, Marina & Afanassieva, Marianne, 2023. "Toward the adoption of digital assistive technology: Factors affecting older people's initial trust formation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    14. Yin Ma & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Shih-Chih Chen, 2019. "Investigating the Impact of Critical Factors on Continuance Intention towards Cross-Border Shopping Websites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Xin Lin & Shu-Chen Chang & Tung-Hsiang Chou & Shih-Chih Chen & Athapol Ruangkanjanases, 2021. "Consumers’ Intention to Adopt Blockchain Food Traceability Technology towards Organic Food Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Viju Raghupathi & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2020. "A Social Capital Perspective on Computer-Mediated Group Communication and Performance: An Empirical Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 747-801, August.
    17. Tao Zhou, 2015. "Understanding user adoption of location-based services from a dual perspective of enablers and inhibitors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 413-422, April.
    18. Supavich Fone Pengnate & Rathindra Sarathy & Todd J. Arnold, 2021. "The Influence of the Centrality of Visual Website Aesthetics on Online User Responses: Measure Development and Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 435-452, April.
    19. Chai, Sangmi & Kim, Minkyun, 2010. "What makes bloggers share knowledge? An investigation on the role of trust," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 408-415.
    20. Weiquan Wang & Jingjun (David) Xu & May Wang, 2018. "Effects of Recommendation Neutrality and Sponsorship Disclosure on Trust vs. Distrust in Online Recommendation Agents: Moderating Role of Explanations for Organic Recommendations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5198-5219, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trustworthy artificial intelligence; Artificial intelligence; Trust; Framework; Distributed ledger technology; Blockchain;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12525-020-00441-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.