IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eaiere/v18y2021i2d10.1007_s40844-021-00214-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of Tidology and Astronomy in Alfred Marshall’s economics: a reassessment of his economic method for the analysis of periodic and secular variations

Author

Listed:
  • Naoki Matsuyama

    (University of Hyogo)

Abstract

Alfred Marshall explored a scientific method for theorising complex economic phenomena using mechanical and biological analogies. Moreover from his very first book The Economics of Industry Marshall paid attention to the efficacy of a science of tendencies to understand real economic movements. To clarify this, this paper begins by reviewing a methodological problem suggested by Thorstein Veblen, concerning which of Marshall’s economics should be regarded as ‘quasi-evolutionary’. Critically Veblen considered Marshall’s approach to economic progress could not avoid assumptions of a natural law and normality, even though Marshall analyzed the tendency of economic change produced over the ultra-long-term. However, we focus on the approaches Marshall found most convincing, which were based on eighteenth and nineteenth century scientific methods proposed by Cournot, John Herschel, and William Whewell. We examine the methodological significance derived from the analogies of astronomy and tidology over the secular term. Specifically, Marshall investigated the analysis of wages as a science of tendencies to realise fair wages through conciliation, where the influence of time, region, and custom were considered. Therefore, this article demonstrates how Marshall applied a non-Newtonian method based on tidology to the study of secular movements in economic society to develop his understanding of the organic growth of economy scientifically.

Suggested Citation

  • Naoki Matsuyama, 2021. "The influence of Tidology and Astronomy in Alfred Marshall’s economics: a reassessment of his economic method for the analysis of periodic and secular variations," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 549-567, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:18:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-021-00214-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s40844-021-00214-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40844-021-00214-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40844-021-00214-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veblen, Thorstein, 1899. "The Preconceptions of Economic Science I," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 13.
    2. Veblen, Thorstein, 1899. "The Preconceptions of Economic Science II," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 13.
    3. J. Stanley Metcalfe, 2007. "Alfred Marshall and the General Theory of Evolutionary Economics," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 15(1), pages 81-110.
    4. Cook,Simon J., 2009. "The Intellectual Foundations of Alfred Marshall's Economic Science," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521760089.
    5. Thorstein Veblen, 1900. "The Preconceptions of Economic Science," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 14(2), pages 240-269.
    6. Neil Hart, 2012. "Equilibrium and Evolution," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-36117-1.
    7. Veblen, Thorstein, 1900. "The Preconceptions of Economic Science III," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 14.
    8. Thorstein Veblen, 1899. "The Preconceptions of Economic Science," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 13(4), pages 396-426.
    9. Thorstein Veblen, 1899. "The Preconceptions of Economic Science," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 13(2), pages 121-150.
    10. Kenichi Yamamoto & Susumu Egashira, 2012. "Marshall's organic growth theory," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 227-248, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Mittone & Gian Paolo Jesi, 2016. "Heuristic Driven Agents in Tax Evasion: an Agent-based Approach," CEEL Working Papers 1605, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    2. Agnès Labrousse & Sandrine Michel, 2017. "Accumulation regimes," Post-Print hal-01719977, HAL.
    3. Matson, Erik W., 2021. "Satisfaction in action: Hume's endogenous theory of preferences and the virtues of commerce," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 849-860.
    4. Alberto Ruiz‐Villaverde, 2019. "Editor’s Introduction: The Growing Failure of the Neoclassical Paradigm in Economics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 13-34, January.
    5. Wojciech Giza, 2019. "The institutional dimension of market failure," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 18(1), pages 5-15, March.
    6. Tae-Hee Jo, 2016. "What If There Are No Conventional Price Mechanisms?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 327-344, April.
    7. Olivier Mesly & María del Carmen de la Orden de la Cruz & Juan Francisco Núñez Grapain, 2014. "Preferred shares in Spain: a case of financial predation?," Economía, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales (IIES). Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida, Venezuela, vol. 39(37), pages 77-99, January-J.
    8. Keith Tribe, 2010. "Marshall and Marshallian Economics in Britain," Chapters, in: Tiziano Raffaelli & Giacomo Becattini & Katia Caldari & Marco Dardi (ed.), The Impact of Alfred Marshall’s Ideas, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Guilherme Silva Fracarolli, 2021. "Global Markets, Local Issues: The Hegemonic Process of Agri-Food Construction to Present Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Roger E. Backhouse & Bradley W. Bateman & Steven G. Medema, 2010. "The Reception of Marshall in the United States," Chapters, in: Tiziano Raffaelli & Giacomo Becattini & Katia Caldari & Marco Dardi (ed.), The Impact of Alfred Marshall’s Ideas, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. António Madureira & Nico Baken & Harry Bouwman, 2011. "Value of digital information networks: a holonic framework," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, April.
    12. Blind, Georg, 2015. "Behavioural rules: Veblen, Nelson-Winter, Oström and beyond," MPRA Paper 66866, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. K.Vela Velupillai, 2014. "One Hundred Years Ago - Economic Theory in 1914," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1408, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    14. David Colander & Richard Holt & Barkley Rosser, 2004. "The changing face of mainstream economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 485-499.
    15. Jérôme Maucourant, 1998. "Pulsions et institutions : l'apport de Thorstein Veblen," Post-Print halshs-00564844, HAL.
    16. Gilles Dostaler, 2001. "L'école autrichienne dans le panorama de la pensée économique," Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM 20-06, Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des sciences économiques.
    17. Nuno Ornelas Martins, 2015. "Why is this ‘school’ called neoclassical economics? Classicism and neoclassicism in historical context," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 01, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
    18. Ingrid Rima, 1996. "Can neoclassical economics be social economics?," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 5-13, January.
    19. Tae-Hee Jo, 2021. "A Veblenian Critique of Nelson and Winter’s Evolutionary Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 1101-1117, October.
    20. Geoffrey Harcourt & Peter Kriesler, 2012. "Introduction [to Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics: Oxford University Press: USA]," Discussion Papers 2012-33, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Composite quasi-rent; Continuity; Fair wages; Organic growth theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:18:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-021-00214-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.