IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v18y2012i4d10.1007_s10588-012-9128-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verifying agent-based models with steady-state analysis

Author

Listed:
  • James E. Gentile

    (University of Notre Dame)

  • Gregory J. Davis

    (University of Notre Dame)

  • Samuel S. C. Rund

    (University of Notre Dame)

Abstract

Agent-based modeling has been well received in the simulation community. Complex systems are simulated by many autonomous agents whose behavior is defined by a conceptual model. However, the model can be improperly implemented or misinterpreted resulting in an implementation that does not reflect the conceptual rules. It is imperative that the implementation’s function be tested against the model’s expected outcome. In this paper, we present certain steady-state techniques that can be used to verify the operation of agent-based simulations. These methods are introduced and then applied to an ecological model which simulates reproductive dynamics of mosquitoes.

Suggested Citation

  • James E. Gentile & Gregory J. Davis & Samuel S. C. Rund, 2012. "Verifying agent-based models with steady-state analysis," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 404-418, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:18:y:2012:i:4:d:10.1007_s10588-012-9128-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-012-9128-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-012-9128-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-012-9128-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 1995. "Verification and validation of simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 145-162, April.
    2. Fatima Rateb & Bernard Pavard & Narjes Bellamine-BenSaoud & J.J. Merelo & M.G. Arenas, 2005. "Modeling Malaria with Multi-Agent Systems," International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies (IJIIT), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 17-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianjun Lu & Shozo Tokinaga, 2016. "Cluster fluctuation in two-dimensional lattices with local interactions," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 237-259, June.
    2. Madeira, Carlos, 2019. "Measuring the covariance risk of consumer debt portfolios," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 21-38.
    3. Bing Bai & Byungjoon Yoo & Xiuquan Deng & Iljoo Kim & Dehua Gao, 2016. "Linking routines to the evolution of IT capability on agent-based modeling and simulation: a dynamic perspective," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 184-211, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Manuel Larrosa, 2016. "Agentes computacionales y análisis económico," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 18(34), pages 87-113, January-J.
    2. Pau Fonseca i Casas, 2023. "A Continuous Process for Validation, Verification, and Accreditation of Simulation Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    4. Edris Yousefi Rad & Mohammad Reza Mahpeykar, 2017. "A Novel Hybrid Approach for Numerical Modeling of the Nucleating Flow in Laval Nozzle and Transonic Steam Turbine Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-37, August.
    5. Tunali, S. & Batmaz, I., 2003. "A metamodeling methodology involving both qualitative and quantitative input factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 437-450, October.
    6. Patrick Afflerbach & Christopher Dun & Henner Gimpel & Dominik Parak & Johannes Seyfried, 2021. "A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Wisdom of Crowds Phenomenon in Aggregating Expert Judgment," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(4), pages 329-348, August.
    7. Diaz, Rafael & Behr, Joshua G. & Acero, Beatriz, 2022. "Coastal housing recovery in a postdisaster environment: A supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    8. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1995. "Sensitivity analysis and optimization of system dynamics models : Regression analysis and statistical design of experiments," Other publications TiSEM 87ee6ee0-592c-4204-ac50-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Janová, Jitka & Hampel, David & Nerudová, Danuše, 2019. "Design and validation of a tax sustainability index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 916-926.
    10. Sander van der Hoog, 2017. "Deep Learning in (and of) Agent-Based Models: A Prospectus," Papers 1706.06302, arXiv.org.
    11. Aumann, Craig A., 2007. "A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 385-396.
    12. Giuliano Rancilio & Alexandre Lucas & Evangelos Kotsakis & Gianluca Fulli & Marco Merlo & Maurizio Delfanti & Marcelo Masera, 2019. "Modeling a Large-Scale Battery Energy Storage System for Power Grid Application Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    13. MacPherson, Brian & Gras, Robin, 2016. "Individual-based ecological models: Adjunctive tools or experimental systems?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 323(C), pages 106-114.
    14. Ao, Dan & Hu, Zhen & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2017. "Design of validation experiments for life prediction models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 22-33.
    15. Labaka, Leire & Hernantes, Josune & Sarriegi, Jose M., 2015. "Resilience framework for critical infrastructures: An empirical study in a nuclear plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 92-105.
    16. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    17. Aros, Susan K. & Gibbons, Deborah E., 2018. "Exploring communication media options in an inter-organizational disaster response coordination network using agent-based simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 451-465.
    18. Meiyan Wang & Chen Chen & Bingxin Fan & Zilu Yin & Wenxuan Li & Huifang Wang & Fang’ai Chi, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Envelope Design of Rural Tourism Buildings in Southeastern Coastal Areas of China Based on NSGA-II Algorithm and Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-27, April.
    19. Kleijnen, J. P. C., 2001. "Ethical issues in modeling: Some reflections," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 223-230, April.
    20. Strang, Kenneth David, 2012. "Importance of verifying queue model assumptions before planning with simulation software," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 493-504.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:18:y:2012:i:4:d:10.1007_s10588-012-9128-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.