IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v141y2017i2d10.1007_s10584-016-1876-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy versus variability of climate projections for flood assessment in central Italy

Author

Listed:
  • S. Camici

    (Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council)

  • L. Brocca

    (Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council)

  • T. Moramarco

    (Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council)

Abstract

Climatic extremes are changing and decision-makers express a strong need for reliable information on future changes over the coming decades as a basis for adaption strategies. In the hydrological-hydraulic context, to estimate changes on floods, a modeling chain composed by general circulation models (GCMs), bias correction (BC) methods, and hydrological modeling is generally applied. It is well-known that each step of the modeling chain introduces uncertainties, resulting in a reduction of the reliability of future climate projections. The main goal of this study is the assessment of the accuracy and variability (i.e., model accuracy, climate intermodel variability, and natural variability) on climate projections related to the present period. By using six different GCMs and two BC methods, the “climate intermodel variability” is evaluated. “Natural variability” is estimated through random realizations of stochastic weather generators. By comparing observed and simulated extreme discharge values, obtained through a continuous rainfall-runoff model, “model accuracy” is computed. The Tiber River basin in central Italy is used as a case study. Results show that in climate projections, model accuracy and climate intermodel variability components have to be clearly distinguished. For accuracy, the hydrological model is found to be the largest source of error; for variability, natural variability contributes for more than 75% to the total variability while GCM and BC have a much lower influence. Moreover, accuracy and variability components vary significantly, and not consistently, between catchments with different permeability characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Camici & L. Brocca & T. Moramarco, 2017. "Accuracy versus variability of climate projections for flood assessment in central Italy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 273-286, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:141:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-016-1876-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-016-1876-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-016-1876-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-016-1876-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Lehmann & Matthias Rillig, 2014. "Distinguishing variability from uncertainty," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 153-153, March.
    2. A. Kay & H. Davies & V. Bell & R. Jones, 2009. "Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 41-63, January.
    3. Christel Prudhomme & Alison Kay & Sue Crooks & Nick Reynard, 2013. "Climate change and river flooding: Part 2 sensitivity characterisation for british catchments and example vulnerability assessments," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 949-964, August.
    4. Clara Deser & Reto Knutti & Susan Solomon & Adam S. Phillips, 2012. "Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(11), pages 775-779, November.
    5. A. Kay & R. Jones, 2012. "Comparison of the use of alternative UKCP09 products for modelling the impacts of climate change on flood frequency," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 211-230, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ignazio Giuntoli & Gabriele Villarini & Christel Prudhomme & David M. Hannah, 2018. "Uncertainties in projected runoff over the conterminous United States," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 149-162, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dallison, Richard J.H. & Patil, Sopan D., 2023. "Impact of climate change on hydropower potential in the UK and Ireland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 611-628.
    2. Nima Fayaz & Laura E. Condon & David G. Chandler, 2020. "Evaluating the Sensitivity of Projected Reservoir Reliability to the Choice of Climate Projection: A Case Study of Bull Run Watershed, Portland, Oregon," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(6), pages 1991-2009, April.
    3. John Tzilivakis & D. Warner & A. Green & K. Lewis, 2015. "Adapting to climate change: assessing the vulnerability of ecosystem services in Europe in the context of rural development," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 547-572, April.
    4. Indira Pokhrel & Ajay Kalra & Md Mafuzur Rahaman & Ranjeet Thakali, 2020. "Forecasting of Future Flooding and Risk Assessment under CMIP6 Climate Projection in Neuse River, North Carolina," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Carolina Natel Moura & Sílvio Luís Rafaeli Neto & Claudia Guimarães Camargo Campos & Eder Alexandre Schatz Sá, 2020. "Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change in a Well-preserved Upland Watershed," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(8), pages 2255-2267, June.
    6. Yi Yang & Jianping Tang, 2023. "Downscaling and uncertainty analysis of future concurrent long-duration dry and hot events in China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Alison Kay, 2022. "Differences in hydrological impacts using regional climate model and nested convection-permitting model data," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Michael R. Grose & James S. Risbey & Penny H. Whetton, 2017. "Tracking regional temperature projections from the early 1990s in light of variations in regional warming, including ‘warming holes’," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 307-322, January.
    9. Christopher W. Callahan & Justin S. Mankin, 2022. "National attribution of historical climate damages," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Shirin Karimi & Bahman Jabbarian Amiri & Arash Malekian, 2019. "Similarity Metrics-Based Uncertainty Analysis of River Water Quality Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 1927-1945, April.
    11. Ho-Seong Yang & Ali Alkhabbaz & Dylan Sheneth Edirisinghe & Watchara Tongphong & Young-Ho Lee, 2022. "FOWT Stability Study According to Number of Columns Considering Amount of Materials Used," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Chenyao Yang & Helder Fraga & Wim Ieperen & Henrique Trindade & João A. Santos, 2019. "Effects of climate change and adaptation options on winter wheat yield under rainfed Mediterranean conditions in southern Portugal," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 159-178, May.
    13. Eun-Sung Chung & Kwangjae Won & Yeonjoo Kim & Hosun Lee, 2014. "Water Resource Vulnerability Characteristics by District’s Population Size in a Changing Climate Using Subjective and Objective Weights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Florence Habets & Julien Boé & Michel Déqué & Agnès Ducharne & Simon Gascoin & Ali Hachour & Eric Martin & Christian Pagé & Eric Sauquet & Laurent Terray & Dominique Thiéry & Ludovic Oudin & Pascal Vi, 2013. "Impact of climate change on the hydrogeology of two basins in northern France," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 771-785, December.
    15. Richard Arsenault & François Brissette & Jean-Stéphane Malo & Marie Minville & Robert Leconte, 2013. "Structural and Non-Structural Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for the Péribonka Water Resource System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2075-2087, May.
    16. Ye Tian & Yue-Ping Xu & Xu-Jie Zhang, 2013. "Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on River High Flows through Comparative Use of GR4J, HBV and Xinanjiang Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(8), pages 2871-2888, June.
    17. Michelle Vliet & Stephen Blenkinsop & Aidan Burton & Colin Harpham & Hans Broers & Hayley Fowler, 2012. "A multi-model ensemble of downscaled spatial climate change scenarios for the Dommel catchment, Western Europe," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 249-277, March.
    18. Zigeng Niu & Lan Feng & Xinxin Chen & Xiuping Yi, 2021. "Evaluation and Future Projection of Extreme Climate Events in the Yellow River Basin and Yangtze River Basin in China Using Ensembled CMIP5 Models Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Lauren M. Cook & Seth McGinnis & Constantine Samaras, 2020. "The effect of modeling choices on updating intensity-duration-frequency curves and stormwater infrastructure designs for climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 289-308, March.
    20. Charles D. Kolstad & Frances C. Moore, 2019. "Estimating the Economic Impacts of Climate Change Using Weather Observations," NBER Working Papers 25537, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:141:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-016-1876-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.