IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v30y2022i2d10.1007_s10100-021-00790-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy and robust approach for decision-making in disaster situations

Author

Listed:
  • Tereza Sedlářová Nehézová

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Michal Škoda

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Robert Hlavatý

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Helena Brožová

    (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

Abstract

The paper deals with the combination of multiple criteria decision making, fuzzy modelling, and robust optimization for shortest path planning (graph theory) in emergency management. Many factors can be included in the evaluation of uncertainty in emergency situations. Graph theory is used for representation of affected area, fuzzy modelling approach and fuzzy linguistic scales are used for the assessment of these factors and the resulting uncertainty. Based on the aggregation of the multiple criteria evaluation, the edges of the graph are divided into subsets according to their levels of uncertainty. Finally, we introduce a robust approach that reflects these different subsets and allows us to plan paths under uncertainty in travel times on edges. Different relevant scenarios are calculated and compared with each other. The results show that setting different uncertainty levels has a significant impact on the solution. The suggested approach using vague terms is shown as a possible tool for setting up the uncertainty set for the robust optimization approach in shortest path planning. This approach also allows to set and modify properly the solution based on the newly obtained information. The approach suggested for robust and fuzzy models is described in detail and is shown in the example of the area of Oaxaca, Mexico where the earthquake occurred in 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Tereza Sedlářová Nehézová & Michal Škoda & Robert Hlavatý & Helena Brožová, 2022. "Fuzzy and robust approach for decision-making in disaster situations," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 617-645, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:30:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10100-021-00790-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-021-00790-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-021-00790-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-021-00790-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Virginie Gabrel & Cécile Murat & Lei Wu, 2013. "New models for the robust shortest path problem: complexity, resolution and generalization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 97-120, August.
    2. Taccari, Leonardo, 2016. "Integer programming formulations for the elementary shortest path problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 122-130.
    3. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    4. Altay, Nezih & Green III, Walter G., 2006. "OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 475-493, November.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & David B. Brown, 2009. "Constructing Uncertainty Sets for Robust Linear Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1483-1495, December.
    6. Najafi, Mehdi & Eshghi, Kourosh & Dullaert, Wout, 2013. "A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 217-249.
    7. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    8. Liu, Kanglin & Li, Qiaofeng & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2019. "Distributionally robust optimization of an emergency medical service station location and sizing problem with joint chance constraints," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 79-101.
    9. Galindo, Gina & Batta, Rajan, 2013. "Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 201-211.
    10. Ji, Ya-Min & Qi, Ming-Liang, 2020. "A robust optimization approach for decontamination planning of emergency planning zone: Facility location and assignment plan," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    12. Ben-Tal, Aharon & Chung, Byung Do & Mandala, Supreet Reddy & Yao, Tao, 2011. "Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1177-1189, September.
    13. de la Torre, Luis E. & Dolinskaya, Irina S. & Smilowitz, Karen R., 2012. "Disaster relief routing: Integrating research and practice," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 88-97.
    14. Rawls, Carmen G. & Turnquist, Mark A., 2010. "Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 521-534, May.
    15. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    16. G Barbarosoǧlu & Y Arda, 2004. "A two-stage stochastic programming framework for transportation planning in disaster response," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(1), pages 43-53, January.
    17. Rolando M. Tomasini & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Pan-american health organization’s humanitarian supply management system: de-politicization of the humanitarian supply chain by creating accountability," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(3), pages 437-449, March.
    18. Christian Fikar & Patrick Hirsch & Pamela C. Nolz, 2018. "Agent-based simulation optimization for dynamic disaster relief distribution," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(2), pages 423-442, June.
    19. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    20. Roy, Bernard, 2010. "Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: A multi-faceted issue," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 629-638, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Ying, Kuo-Ching & Chen, Hui-Ju, 2016. "Real-time relief distribution in the aftermath of disasters – A rolling horizon approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-20.
    2. Özdamar, Linet & Ertem, Mustafa Alp, 2015. "Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 55-65.
    3. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    4. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. TURKEŠ, Renata & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & PALHAZI CUERVO, Daniel, 2020. "Deriving rules of thumb for facility decision making in humanitarian operations," Working Papers 2020002, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    6. Yanyan Wang & Baiqing Sun, 2022. "Multiperiod optimal emergency material allocation considering road network damage and risk under uncertain conditions," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2173-2208, July.
    7. Rodolfo Modrigais Strauss Nunes & Susana Carla Farias Pereira, 2022. "Intellectual structure and trends in the humanitarian operations field," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1099-1157, December.
    8. Qi, Mingyao & Yang, Ying & Cheng, Chun, 2023. "Location and inventory pre-positioning problem under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    9. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    10. Zhang, Guowei & Jia, Ning & Zhu, Ning & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Ma, Shoufeng, 2023. "Robust drone selective routing in humanitarian transportation network assessment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 400-428.
    11. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    12. Balcik, Burcu & Yanıkoğlu, İhsan, 2020. "A robust optimization approach for humanitarian needs assessment planning under travel time uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 40-57.
    13. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Lotfi, M.M. & Baghaian, Atefe & Ruiz, Rubén & Rezapour, Shabnam, 2020. "Mass casualty management in disaster scene: A systematic review of OR&MS research in humanitarian operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 787-819.
    14. Renata Turkeš & Daniel Palhazi Cuervo & Kenneth Sörensen, 2019. "Pre-positioning of emergency supplies: does putting a price on human life help to save lives?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 865-895, December.
    15. Kamyabniya, Afshin & Noormohammadzadeh, Zohre & Sauré, Antoine & Patrick, Jonathan, 2021. "A robust integrated logistics model for age-based multi-group platelets in disaster relief operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Wang, Duo & Yang, Kai & Yang, Lixing & Dong, Jianjun, 2023. "Two-stage distributionally robust optimization for disaster relief logistics under option contract and demand ambiguity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Alem, Douglas & Clark, Alistair & Moreno, Alfredo, 2016. "Stochastic network models for logistics planning in disaster relief," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 187-206.
    18. Nihal Berktaş & Bahar Yetiş Kara & Oya Ekin Karaşan, 2016. "Solution methodologies for debris removal in disaster response," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 403-445, September.
    19. Doan, Xuan Vinh & Shaw, Duncan, 2019. "Resource allocation when planning for simultaneous disasters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 687-709.
    20. Li, Xiaoping & Batta, Rajan & Kwon, Changhyun, 2017. "Effective and equitable supply of gasoline to impacted areas in the aftermath of a natural disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 25-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:30:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10100-021-00790-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.