IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v27y2019i2d10.1007_s10100-018-0552-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating combinatorial algorithms into a linear programming solver

Author

Listed:
  • Richárd Molnár-Szipai

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)

  • Anita Varga

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)

Abstract

While there are numerous linear (and nonlinear) solvers, as well as specialized algorithms for combinatorial problems, they are rarely used together. We wrote a new module for the XPRESS optimizer that lets us call the objects and functions of the LEMON C++ library. We tested this module by comparing two versions of the Dual Ascent Procedure (DAP) (Adams and Johnson in DIMACS Ser Discrete Math Theor Comput Sci 16:43–75, 1994). It is an iterative algorithm that produces lower bounds for the quadratic assignment problem (QAP). The DAP is based on the level-1 RLT-relaxation (reformulation-linearization technique) of the QAP. This formulation is significantly larger than the original QAP, but if we construct its Lagrangian dual, we can decompose the new relaxation to smaller linear assignment problems for a fixed Lagrange multiplier. The algorithm determines a better Lagrange multiplier in every iteration. We implemented two versions of the DAP with the XPRESS Optimization Software. In the first model we solved the smaller linear assignment problems with the linear programming methods of XPRESS, while in the second model we solved them by using the graph algorithms of the LEMON library via the new module. Using the instances of QAPLIB, the new module produced significantly better running times, which suggests that this direction of research might yield further results in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Richárd Molnár-Szipai & Anita Varga, 2019. "Integrating combinatorial algorithms into a linear programming solver," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(2), pages 475-482, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:27:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10100-018-0552-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-018-0552-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-018-0552-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-018-0552-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adams, Warren P. & Guignard, Monique & Hahn, Peter M. & Hightower, William L., 2007. "A level-2 reformulation-linearization technique bound for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 983-996, August.
    2. Hugh Everett, 1963. "Generalized Lagrange Multiplier Method for Solving Problems of Optimum Allocation of Resources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 399-417, June.
    3. Christopher E. Nugent & Thomas E. Vollmann & John Ruml, 1968. "An Experimental Comparison of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities to Locations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 150-173, February.
    4. Eugene L. Lawler, 1963. "The Quadratic Assignment Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 586-599, July.
    5. Sadegh Niroomand & Szabolcs Takács & Béla Vizvári, 2011. "To lay out or not to lay out?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 183-192, November.
    6. Mavridou, T. & Pardalos, P.M. & Pitsoulis, L.S. & Resende, Mauricio G.C., 1998. "A GRASP for the biquadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 613-621, March.
    7. Frederick S. Hillier & Michael M. Connors, 1966. "Quadratic Assignment Problem Algorithms and the Location of Indivisible Facilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 42-57, September.
    8. Peter M. Hahn & Yi-Rong Zhu & Monique Guignard & William L. Hightower & Matthew J. Saltzman, 2012. "A Level-3 Reformulation-Linearization Technique-Based Bound for the Quadratic Assignment Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 202-209, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Botond Bertók & Tibor Csendes & Gábor Galambos, 2021. "Operations research in Hungary: VOCAL 2018," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 379-386, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silva, Allyson & Coelho, Leandro C. & Darvish, Maryam, 2021. "Quadratic assignment problem variants: A survey and an effective parallel memetic iterated tabu search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1066-1084.
    2. Loiola, Eliane Maria & de Abreu, Nair Maria Maia & Boaventura-Netto, Paulo Oswaldo & Hahn, Peter & Querido, Tania, 2007. "A survey for the quadratic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 657-690, January.
    3. Bolte, Andreas & Thonemann, Ulrich Wilhelm, 1996. "Optimizing simulated annealing schedules with genetic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 402-416, July.
    4. Jiming Peng & Tao Zhu & Hezhi Luo & Kim-Chuan Toh, 2015. "Semi-definite programming relaxation of quadratic assignment problems based on nonredundant matrix splitting," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 171-198, January.
    5. Ravi Kumar, K. & Hadjinicola, George C. & Lin, Ting-li, 1995. "A heuristic procedure for the single-row facility layout problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 65-73, November.
    6. Alexandre Domingues Gonçalves & Artur Alves Pessoa & Cristiana Bentes & Ricardo Farias & Lúcia Maria de A. Drummond, 2017. "A Graphics Processing Unit Algorithm to Solve the Quadratic Assignment Problem Using Level-2 Reformulation-Linearization Technique," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 676-687, November.
    7. Kazuhiro Tsuchiya & Sunil Bharitkar & Yoshiyasu Takefuji, 1996. "A neural network approach to facility layout problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 556-563, March.
    8. Kim, J. -Y. & Kim, Y. -D., 1995. "Graph theoretic heuristics for unequal-sized facility layout problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 391-401, August.
    9. Ketan Date & Rakesh Nagi, 2019. "Level 2 Reformulation Linearization Technique–Based Parallel Algorithms for Solving Large Quadratic Assignment Problems on Graphics Processing Unit Clusters," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 771-789, October.
    10. Yu, Junfang & Sarker, Bhaba R., 2003. "Directional decomposition heuristic for a linear machine-cell location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 142-184, August.
    11. Ceder, A. & Golany, B. & Tal, O., 2001. "Creating bus timetables with maximal synchronization," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 913-928, December.
    12. Pessoa, Artur Alves & Hahn, Peter M. & Guignard, Monique & Zhu, Yi-Rong, 2010. "Algorithms for the generalized quadratic assignment problem combining Lagrangean decomposition and the Reformulation-Linearization Technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 54-63, October.
    13. Huizhen Zhang & Cesar Beltran-Royo & Liang Ma, 2013. "Solving the quadratic assignment problem by means of general purpose mixed integer linear programming solvers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 261-278, August.
    14. Stefan Helber & Daniel Böhme & Farid Oucherif & Svenja Lagershausen & Steffen Kasper, 2016. "A hierarchical facility layout planning approach for large and complex hospitals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 5-29, June.
    15. Hahn, Peter M. & Kim, Bum-Jin & Stutzle, Thomas & Kanthak, Sebastian & Hightower, William L. & Samra, Harvind & Ding, Zhi & Guignard, Monique, 2008. "The quadratic three-dimensional assignment problem: Exact and approximate solution methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 416-428, January.
    16. Nihal Berktaş & Hande Yaman, 2021. "A Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Team Formation on Social Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1162-1176, July.
    17. E. de Klerk & R. Sotirov & U. Truetsch, 2015. "A New Semidefinite Programming Relaxation for the Quadratic Assignment Problem and Its Computational Perspectives," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 378-391, May.
    18. Mouhamadou A. M. T. Baldé & Serigne Gueye & Babacar M. Ndiaye, 2021. "A greedy evolutionary hybridization algorithm for the optimal network and quadratic assignment problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1663-1690, September.
    19. Palubeckis, Gintaras, 2015. "Fast simulated annealing for single-row equidistant facility layout," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 287-301.
    20. Monique Guignard, 2020. "Strong RLT1 bounds from decomposable Lagrangean relaxation for some quadratic 0–1 optimization problems with linear constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 173-200, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:27:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10100-018-0552-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.