IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/apjors/v5y2021i2d10.1007_s41685-020-00169-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the process of, and potential demand for, water resource land acquisition in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Ryohei Yamashita

    (Ishikawa Prefectural University)

Abstract

This study focused on the suspected conflict between Japanese public opinion and forest land acquisition by foreign investors in Japan’s water source areas. To establish whether the state of public anxiety and the regulatory efforts to address it corresponds with investors’ opinions and intentions, the study investigated the interest of investors from Taiwan and Hong Kong in acquiring land in these water source areas. An analysis of 618 responses, obtained through an online questionnaire, revealed the following: (1) recent land acquisition by foreign economic entities is concentrated on flat areas, rather than water source areas. (2) Almost all investors that acquired land were conscious of the need to maintain harmonious relations with local communities. (3) Land acquisition in water source areas is expected to continue in future, but the purpose is neither to hold assets without a clear purpose nor to resell them for profit, nor to develop water resources. (4) Investors had no intention of undermining the concerns of local residents. In future, developing an effective management plan for the water source region will depend upon creating a system of governance that allows for the sharing of consciousness and the exchange of information by local resident, cities, prefectures, and the country as a whole. Above all, it should have an accurate factual basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryohei Yamashita, 2021. "Exploring the process of, and potential demand for, water resource land acquisition in Japan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 625-642, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:5:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s41685-020-00169-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s41685-020-00169-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41685-020-00169-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41685-020-00169-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Wolford & Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Ruth Hall & Ian Scoones & Ben White & Jennifer Baka, 2013. "The Political Construction of Wasteland: Governmentality, Land Acquisition and Social Inequality in South India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(2), pages 409-428, March.
    2. Lian, Hongping & Li, Hui & Ko, Kilkon, 2019. "Market-led transactions and illegal land use: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 12-20.
    3. Ghatak, Maitreesh & Mookherjee, Dilip, 2014. "Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 303-312.
    4. Polat, Zeynel Abidin, 2019. "Legal, economic, geographical and demographic analysis of the acquisition of Real Estate by foreign nationals in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 207-217.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patil, Vikram & Ghosh, Ranjan & Kathuria, Vinish & Farrell, Katharine N., 2020. "Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners’ choices for compensation under land acquisition in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Sonia Bhalotra & Abhishek Chakravarty & Dilip Mookherjee & Francisco J. Pino, 2019. "Property Rights and Gender Bias: Evidence from Land Reform in West Bengal," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(2), pages 205-237, April.
    3. Lu, Shenghua & Wang, Hui, 2023. "How revolving-door recruitment makes firms stand out in land market: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Kleemann, Linda & Thiele, Rainer, 2015. "Rural welfare implications of large-scale land acquisitions in Africa: A theoretical framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 269-279.
    5. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2015. "Land Acquisition and Compensation Policy for Development Activity," MPRA Paper 72849, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Sep 2015.
    6. Jain, Sanjay & Majumdar, Sumon & Mukand, Sharun W, 2014. "Walk the line: Conflict, state capacity and the political dynamics of reform," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 150-166.
    7. Chowdhury, Prabal Roy, 2013. "Land acquisition: Political intervention, fragmentation and voice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 63-78.
    8. Kristian Hoelscher, 2016. "The evolution of the smart cities agenda in India," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 19(1), pages 28-44, March.
    9. Lei Yan & Xubin Lei & Kairong Hong & Hui Li & Mengyuan Chen, 2022. "Improving Farmer Willingness to Participate in the Transfer of Land Rights in Rural China: A Preference-Based Income Distribution Scheme," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Dinh, Hoang Huu & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Wilson, Clevo, 2017. "Economic incentive and factors affecting tree planting of rural households: Evidence from the Central Highlands of Vietnam," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 14-24.
    11. Yang, Jidong & Liu, Cheng & Liu, Kai, 2023. "Land marketization and industrial restructuring in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Alkan Gökler, Leyla, 2021. "Foreign demand and high-rise luxury housing projects in two Turkish cities: Ankara and Trabzon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Troisi, Roberta, 2022. "Illegal land use by Italian firms: An empirical analysis through the lens of isomorphism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Bin Duan & Xuanming Ji, 2021. "Can Carbon Finance Optimize Land Use Efficiency? The Example of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Jana, Arnab & Basu, Rounaq & Mukherjee, Conan, 2020. "A game theoretic approach to optimize multi-stakeholder utilities for land acquisition negotiations with informality," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    16. Ghatak, Maitreesh & Mitra, Sandip & Mookherjee, Dilip & Nath, Anusha, 2013. "Land Acquisition and Compensation in Singur: What Really Happened?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 121, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    17. Libang Ma & Tianmin Tao & Yao Yao & Yawei Li, 2023. "Renovation Potential Evaluation and Type Identification of Rural Idle Residential Land: A Case Study of Yuzhong County, Longzhong Loess Hilly Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Eliküçük, Seval & Polat, Zeynel Abidin, 2021. "Identifying key factors affecting foreigners' choice on real estate acquisition: The case of İzmir City, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    19. Chakaphon Singto & Martijn Vries & Gert Jan Hofstede & Luuk Fleskens, 2021. "Ex Ante Impact Assessment of Reservoir Construction Projects for Different Stakeholders Using Agent-Based Modeling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(3), pages 1047-1064, February.
    20. Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Renée Hannah A. Niro, 2023. "Antecedents of Real Estate Investment Intention among Filipino Millennials and Gen Z: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-35, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:apjors:v:5:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s41685-020-00169-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.