IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v209y2013i1p179-20510.1007-s10479-013-1323-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The stochastic economic lot sizing problem for non-stop multi-grade production with sequence-restricted setup changeovers

Author

Listed:
  • George Liberopoulos
  • Dimitrios Pandelis
  • Olympia Hatzikonstantinou

Abstract

We study a variant of the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem (SELSP) encountered in process industries, in which a single production facility must produce several different grades of a family of products to meet random stationary demand for each grade from a common finished-goods (FG) inventory buffer that has limited storage capacity. When the facility is set up to produce a particular grade, the only allowable changeovers are from that grade to the next lower or higher grade. Raw material is always available, and the production facility produces continuously at a constant rate even during changeover transitions. All changeover times are constant and equal to each other, and demand that cannot be satisfied directly from inventory is lost. There is a changeover cost per changeover occasion, a spill-over cost per unit of product in excess whenever there is not enough space in the FG buffer to store the produced grade, and a lost-sales cost per unit short whenever there is not enough FG inventory to satisfy the demand. We model the SELSP as a discrete-time Markov decision process (MDP), where in each time period the decision is whether to initiate a changeover to a neighboring grade or keep the set up of the production facility unchanged, based on the current state of the system, which is defined by the current set up of the facility and the FG inventory levels of all the grades. The goal is to minimize the (long-run) expected average cost per period. For problems with more than three grades, we develop a heuristic solution procedure which is based on decomposing the original multi-grade problem into several 3-grade MDP sub-problems, numerically solving each sub-problem using value iteration, and constructing the final policy for the original problem by combining parts of the optimal policies of the sub-problems. We present numerical results for problem examples with 2–5 grades. For the 2- and 3-grade examples, we numerically solve the exact MDP problem using value iteration to obtain insights into the structure of the optimal changeover policy. For the 4- and 5-grade examples, we compare the performance of the decomposition-based heuristic (DBH) solution procedure against that obtained by numerically solving the exact problem. We also compare the performance of the DBH method against the performance of three simpler parameterized heuristics. Finally, we compare the performance of the DBH and the exact solution procedures for the case where the FG inventory storage consists of a number of separate general-purpose silos capable of storing any grade as long as it is not mixed with any other grade. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Suggested Citation

  • George Liberopoulos & Dimitrios Pandelis & Olympia Hatzikonstantinou, 2013. "The stochastic economic lot sizing problem for non-stop multi-grade production with sequence-restricted setup changeovers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 179-205, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:209:y:2013:i:1:p:179-205:10.1007/s10479-013-1323-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1323-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-013-1323-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-013-1323-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karmarkar, Uday S. & Yoo, Jinsung, 1994. "The stochastic dynamic product cycling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 360-373, March.
    2. Serge M. Karalli & A. Dale Flowers, 2006. "The Multiple-Family ELSP with Safety Stocks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 523-531, June.
    3. Sox, Charles R. & Jackson, Peter L. & Bowman, Alan & Muckstadt, John A., 1999. "A review of the stochastic lot scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 181-200, September.
    4. Meir Herzberg & Uri Yechiali, 1994. "Accelerating Procedures of the Value Iteration Algorithm for Discounted Markov Decision Processes, Based on a One-Step Lookahead Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 940-946, October.
    5. Salah E. Elmaghraby, 1978. "The Economic Lot Scheduling Problem (ELSP): Review and Extensions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 587-598, February.
    6. Winands, E.M.M. & Adan, I.J.B.F. & van Houtum, G.J., 2011. "The stochastic economic lot scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 1-9, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongjian Li & Xiaoqiang Cai & Lei Xu & Wenxia Yang, 2016. "Heuristic approach on dynamic lot-sizing model for durable products with end-of-use constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 265-283, July.
    2. Shib Sana, 2015. "An EOQ model for stochastic demand for limited capacity of own warehouse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 383-399, October.
    3. Löhndorf, Nils & Riel, Manuel & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 170-176.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beck, Fabian G. & Biel, Konstantin & Glock, Christoph H., 2019. "Integration of energy aspects into the economic lot scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 399-410.
    2. Löhndorf, Nils & Riel, Manuel & Minner, Stefan, 2014. "Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 170-176.
    3. Lopez de Haro, Santiago & Gershwin, Stanley B. & Rosenfield, Donald B., 2009. "Schedule evaluation in unstable manufacturing environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 183-194, September.
    4. Vidal-Carreras, Pilar I. & Garcia-Sabater, Jose P. & Coronado-Hernandez, Jairo R., 2012. "Economic lot scheduling with deliberated and controlled coproduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 396-404.
    5. Beemsterboer, Bart & Land, Martin & Teunter, Ruud, 2017. "Flexible lot sizing in hybrid make-to-order/make-to-stock production planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1014-1023.
    6. Winands, E.M.M. & Adan, I.J.B.F. & van Houtum, G.J., 2011. "The stochastic economic lot scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 1-9, April.
    7. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Jalali, Hamed & Lamas, Alejandro, 2021. "One too many: Product proliferation and the financial performance in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Kumar Rajaram & Uday S. Karmarkar, 2002. "Product Cycling With Uncertain Yields: Analysis and Application to the Process Industry," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 680-691, August.
    9. Beemsterboer, Bart & Land, Martin & Teunter, Ruud, 2016. "Hybrid MTO-MTS production planning: An explorative study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 453-461.
    10. Brander, Par & Forsberg, Rolf, 2006. "Determination of safety stocks for cyclic schedules with stochastic demands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 271-295, December.
    11. Garn, Wolfgang & Aitken, James, 2015. "Agile factorial production for a single manufacturing line with multiple products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 754-766.
    12. Serge M. Karalli & A. Dale Flowers, 2006. "The Multiple-Family ELSP with Safety Stocks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 523-531, June.
    13. Vaughan, Timothy S., 2007. "Cyclical schedules vs. dynamic sequencing: Replenishment dynamics and inventory efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 518-527, June.
    14. Leven, Erik & Segerstedt, Anders, 2007. "A scheduling policy for adjusting economic lot quantities to a feasible solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 414-423, June.
    15. Yokoyama, Masao, 1999. "The eclectic model for stochastic dynamic production cycling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 359-367, April.
    16. Wagner, Michael & Smits, Sanne R., 2004. "A local search algorithm for the optimization of the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 391-402, August.
    17. Jodlbauer, Herbert & Reitner, Sonja, 2012. "Optimizing service-level and relevant cost for a stochastic multi-item cyclic production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 306-317.
    18. Wei-Min Lan & Tava Lennon Olsen, 2006. "Multiproduct Systems with Both Setup Times and Costs: Fluid Bounds and Schedules," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 505-522, June.
    19. Ramesh Bollapragada & Uday Rao, 1999. "Single-Stage Resource Allocation and Economic Lot Scheduling on Multiple, Nonidentical Production Lines," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 889-904, June.
    20. Nicholas G. Hall, 1988. "A multi‐item EOQ model with inventory cycle balancing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 319-325, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:209:y:2013:i:1:p:179-205:10.1007/s10479-013-1323-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.