IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aistmt/v69y2017i1d10.1007_s10463-015-0534-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conditional sure independence screening by conditional marginal empirical likelihood

Author

Listed:
  • Qinqin Hu

    (Shandong University, Weihai)

  • Lu Lin

    (Shandong University)

Abstract

In many applications, researchers often know a certain set of predictors is related to the response from some previous investigations and experiences. Based on the conditional information, we propose a conditional screening feature procedure via ranking conditional marginal empirical likelihood ratios. Due to the use of centralized variable, the proposed screening approach works well when there exist either or both hidden important variables and unimportant variables that are highly marginal correlated with the response. Moreover, the new method is demonstrated effective in scenarios with less restrictive distributional assumptions by inheriting the advantage of empirical likelihood approach and is computationally simple because it only needs to evaluate the conditional marginal empirical likelihood ratio at one point, without parameter estimation and iterative algorithm. The theoretical results reveal that the proposed procedure has sure screening properties. The merits of the procedure are illustrated by extensive numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinqin Hu & Lu Lin, 2017. "Conditional sure independence screening by conditional marginal empirical likelihood," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 69(1), pages 63-96, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:69:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10463-015-0534-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10463-015-0534-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10463-015-0534-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10463-015-0534-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Whitney K. Newey & Richard J. Smith, 2004. "Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 219-255, January.
    2. Chang, Jinyuan & Chen, Song Xi & Chen, Xiaohong, 2015. "High dimensional generalized empirical likelihood for moment restrictions with dependent data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 283-304.
    3. Song Chen & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2009. "A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(3), pages 415-447, November.
    4. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    5. Chenlei Leng & Cheng Yong Tang, 2012. "Penalized empirical likelihood and growing dimensional general estimating equations," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(3), pages 703-716.
    6. Fan, Jianqing & Feng, Yang & Song, Rui, 2011. "Nonparametric Independence Screening in Sparse Ultra-High-Dimensional Additive Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 544-557.
    7. Lin, Lu & Sun, Jing & Zhu, Lixing, 2013. "Nonparametric feature screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 162-174.
    8. Song Xi Chen & Liang Peng & Ying-Li Qin, 2009. "Effects of data dimension on empirical likelihood," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 711-722.
    9. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv & Lei Qi, 2011. "Sparse High-Dimensional Models in Economics," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 291-317, September.
    10. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    11. Peter Hall & D. M. Titterington & Jing‐Hao Xue, 2009. "Tilting methods for assessing the influence of components in a classifier," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(4), pages 783-803, September.
    12. Cheng Yong Tang & Chenlei Leng, 2010. "Penalized high-dimensional empirical likelihood," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(4), pages 905-920.
    13. Song Chen & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2009. "Rejoinder on: A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(3), pages 468-474, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi Chu & Lu Lin, 2020. "Conditional SIRS for nonparametric and semiparametric models by marginal empirical likelihood," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1589-1606, August.
    2. Jing Zhang & Haibo Zhou & Yanyan Liu & Jianwen Cai, 2021. "Conditional screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data in case-cohort studies," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 632-661, October.
    3. Jun Lu & Lu Lin, 2020. "Model-free conditional screening via conditional distance correlation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 225-244, February.
    4. Qinqin Hu & Lu Lin, 2018. "Conditional feature screening for mean and variance functions in models with multiple-index structure," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 357-393, May.
    5. Qinqin Hu & Lu Lin, 2022. "Feature Screening in High Dimensional Regression with Endogenous Covariates," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 949-969, October.
    6. Lu, Jun & Lin, Lu, 2018. "Feature screening for multi-response varying coefficient models with ultrahigh dimensional predictors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 242-254.
    7. Jing Zhang & Yanyan Liu & Hengjian Cui, 2021. "Model-free feature screening via distance correlation for ultrahigh dimensional survival data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 2711-2738, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jia & Shi, Haoming & Tian, Lemeng & Xiao, Fengjun, 2019. "Penalized generalized empirical likelihood in high-dimensional weakly dependent data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 270-283.
    2. Chang, Jinyuan & Chen, Song Xi & Chen, Xiaohong, 2015. "High dimensional generalized empirical likelihood for moment restrictions with dependent data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 283-304.
    3. Tong Tong Wu & Gang Li & Chengyong Tang, 2015. "Empirical Likelihood for Censored Linear Regression and Variable Selection," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 798-812, September.
    4. Mahdieh Bayati & Seyed Kamran Ghoreishi & Jingjing Wu, 2021. "Bayesian analysis of restricted penalized empirical likelihood," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1321-1339, June.
    5. Zang, Yangguang & Zhang, Sanguo & Li, Qizhai & Zhang, Qingzhao, 2016. "Jackknife empirical likelihood test for high-dimensional regression coefficients," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 302-316.
    6. Hong Guo & Changliang Zou & Zhaojun Wang & Bin Chen, 2014. "Empirical likelihood for high-dimensional linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(7), pages 921-945, October.
    7. Tang, Niansheng & Yan, Xiaodong & Zhao, Puying, 2018. "Exponentially tilted likelihood inference on growing dimensional unconditional moment models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 57-74.
    8. Otsu, Taisuke & Xu, Ke-Li & Matsushita, Yukitoshi, 2015. "Empirical likelihood for regression discontinuity design," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 94-112.
    9. Zhenghui Feng & Lu Lin & Ruoqing Zhu & Lixing Zhu, 2020. "Nonparametric variable selection and its application to additive models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(3), pages 827-854, June.
    10. Peirong Xu & Lixing Zhu & Yi Li, 2014. "Ultrahigh dimensional time course feature selection," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 356-365, June.
    11. Liu, Zhongkai & Song, Rui & Zeng, Donglin & Zhang, Jiajia, 2017. "Principal components adjusted variable screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 134-144.
    12. Ying Sheng & Yifei Sun & Chiung‐Yu Huang & Mi‐Ok Kim, 2022. "Synthesizing external aggregated information in the presence of population heterogeneity: A penalized empirical likelihood approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 679-690, June.
    13. Xiaolin Chen & Xiaojing Chen & Yi Liu, 2019. "A note on quantile feature screening via distance correlation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 1741-1762, October.
    14. Bang-Qiang He & Xing-Jian Hong & Guo-Liang Fan, 2020. "Penalized empirical likelihood for partially linear errors-in-variables panel data models with fixed effects," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 2351-2381, December.
    15. Fang, Jianglin, 2023. "A split-and-conquer variable selection approach for high-dimensional general semiparametric models with massive data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    16. Zheqi Wang & Dehui Wang & Jianhua Cheng, 2023. "A new autoregressive process driven by explanatory variables and past observations: an application to PM 2.5," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 619-658, June.
    17. Xiangyu Wang & Chenlei Leng, 2016. "High dimensional ordinary least squares projection for screening variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(3), pages 589-611, June.
    18. Roberto Baragona & Francesco Battaglia & Domenico Cucina, 2017. "Empirical likelihood ratio in penalty form and the convex hull problem," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(4), pages 507-529, November.
    19. Xia Chen & Liyue Mao, 2020. "Penalized empirical likelihood for partially linear errors-in-variables models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 597-623, December.
    20. Zemin Zheng & Jie Zhang & Yang Li, 2022. "L 0 -Regularized Learning for High-Dimensional Additive Hazards Regression," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2762-2775, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:69:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10463-015-0534-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.