IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sek/jijoss/v7y2018i1p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possible Effects Of Uk?S Separation From Eu

Author

Listed:
  • Ekrem Yasar Akcay

    (Hakkari Universitesi)

Abstract

One of the major EU countries, the United Kingdom (UK), the EU has become a member after the first wave of enlargement. Historically Great Britain which opposed to the idea of a European Union, it has been in the economic and political interests despite efforts need to be a member of the Union. UK which became to member of EU, After UK?s application was rejected twice by Former French President Charles De Gaulle, took up a position the attitude towards EU integration by avoiding the problems inherent in the EU up to now. Recently leading to a referendum on EU membership in the UK, 52% of the people have voted to leave the EU. As a result of this situation, Britain's status will be determined according to Lisbon Treaty article 50. In this context, after England's departure from the EU, both in the the Union and in the UK what kind of changes, the advantages and disadvantages are problem of our study. Thus, with the departure of the UK from the EU, an evaluation will be carried out in the same way that economic troubles can be experienced and similar problems can be experienced in the EU, such as the separatist movements and the disintegration of the EU. In this context, it is aimed that the UK will face economic difficulties and the EU will face the danger of dispersal.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekrem Yasar Akcay, 2018. "Possible Effects Of Uk?S Separation From Eu," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:jijoss:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:1-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-social-sciences/publication-detail-1815
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-social-sciences/publication-detail-1815?download=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Moravcsik, 1993. "Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 473-524, December.
    2. Christopher Preston, 1995. "Obstacles to EU Enlargement: The Classical Community Method and the Prospects for a Wider Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 451-463, September.
    3. Thomas Sampson, 2017. "Brexit: The Economics of International Disintegration," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(4), pages 163-184, Fall.
    4. Hans Vollaard, 2014. "Explaining European Disintegration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 1142-1159, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petros E. Ioannatos, 2021. "Brexit or Euro for the UK? Evidence from Panel Data," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 63(1), pages 117-138, March.
    2. Bloom, Nicholas & Bunn, Philip & Chen, Scarlet & Mizen, Paul & Smietanka, Pawel & Thwaites, Gregory, 2019. "The impact of Brexit on UK firms," Bank of England working papers 818, Bank of England.
    3. Thomas Doleys, 2009. "Incomplete Contracting, Commission Discretion and the Origins of EU Merger Control," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 483-506, June.
    4. Patrick Bisciari, 2019. "A survey of the long-term impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU27 economies," Working Paper Research 366, National Bank of Belgium.
    5. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01019642, HAL.
    6. Malte Tobias Kähler, 2011. "From German Rules to European Discretion: Policy’s Slippery Slope," Chapters, in: David Howden (ed.), Institutions in Crisis, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Eric Tremolada & Carlos Tassara & Olivier Costa, 2019. "Colombia y la Unión Europea. Una asociación cada vez más estrecha," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1101, October.
    8. Noriaki Matsushima & Ryusuke Shinohara, 2015. "The efficiency of monopolistic provision of public goods through simultaneous bilateral bargaining," ISER Discussion Paper 0948, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    9. Brigitte Pircher & Karl Loxbo, 2020. "Compliance with EU Law in Times of Disintegration: Exploring Changes in Transposition and Enforcement in the EU Member States between 1997 and 2016," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1270-1287, September.
    10. Seikel, Daniel, 2011. "Wie die Europäische Kommission Liberalisierung durchsetzt: Der Konflikt um das öffentlich-rechtliche Bankenwesen in Deutschland," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/16, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    11. Thumira Gunasena, 2016. "The applicability of adopting European Union?s integration model in South Asia: A comparative analysis of European Union and South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 19-43, May.
    12. Walter Bossert & Andrew E Clark & Conchita D’Ambrosio & Anthony Lepinteur, 2023. "Economic insecurity and political preferences," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(3), pages 802-825.
    13. Andreas Kyriacou, 2009. "Decision rules, membership and political centralization in the European Union," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 143-158, April.
    14. Walter Bossert & Andrew E. Clark & Conchita d'Ambrosio & Anthony Lepinteur, 2019. "Economic Insecurity and the Rise of the Right," PSE Working Papers halshs-02325984, HAL.
    15. Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou, 2022. "The Political Economy of Populism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 753-832, September.
    16. Paul R. Bergin & Giancarlo Corsetti, 2020. "The Macroeconomic Stabilization of Tariff Shocks: What is the Optimal Monetary Response?," Discussion Papers 2017, Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
    17. Swati Dhingra & Rebecca Freeman & Hanwei Huang, 2023. "The Impact of Non‐tariff Barriers on Trade and Welfare," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(357), pages 140-177, January.
    18. Polyzos, Stathis & Samitas, Aristeidis & Katsaiti, Marina-Selini, 2020. "Who is unhappy for Brexit? A machine-learning, agent-based study on financial instability," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Raouf Boucekkine & Carmen Camacho & Weihua Ruan & Benteng Zou, 2022. "Why and when coalitions split? An alternative analytical approach with an application to environmental agreements," Working Papers halshs-03676670, HAL.
    20. V. Sidenko, 2017. "The crisis processes in the EU development: origins and prospects," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 1, pages 7-30.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU; United Kingdom; Lisbon Treaty; Separation from the EU; Referendum.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General
    • Z19 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:jijoss:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijoss.iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.