IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2017i3p61-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Некоторые Проблемы Теории Экономического Роста // Some Problems Of The Economic Growth Theory

Author

Listed:
  • O. Sukharev S.

    (the Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • О. Сухарев С.

    (Российская академия наук)

Abstract

The subject of the study is the resource approach to the economic growth policy including theoretical aspects of the economic growth model. A recession is usually replaced by the growth dynamics, and the economy’s recovery from the recession requires justification of government policy measures that not only help overcome the crisis, but also lead the economy to sustainable growth at a given pace. The study is concerned with the assessment of aggregate type models within the framework of the resource-factor approach and the impact of investments and consumer spendings on the economic growth rate at the theoretical (model) and empirical levels of analysis. The modern technological level and the type of “technological function” ensure not only the ability of the economy to grow in the current regime but also provide the basis for long-term growth prospects. The technological choice determines the extensive or intensive types of economic growth. The relationship between the rates of creating a new resource and diversion of an existing one to ensure the growth has been determined. The more intensive is the diversion of the resource from available facilities as well as the higher is the interest rate, the lower are the opportunities for creating a new resource and more modest are growth opportunities through the development of a new resource. It is shown that the change in the technological level to ensure the growth of the economic system requires a greater change in consumer spendings. Concerning the economic policy of investment promotion in Russia, it is shown that in the first phase of the recovery, it is advisable not so much to increase the amount of investments as stimulate aggregate consumption and restore the income level. Therefore, the consumption crisis must be eliminated, and since economic growth can occur not through investments (as it was in Russia before the 2015 crisis), it is necessary to seek a growth policy through investments considering their impact on the technological parameters of the economic system. Besides, the increase in the savings rate is not an end in itself for the establishment of the economic growth policy, it is, rather, a resultant parameter that should be taken as such when making macroeconomic decisions. Предметом исследования стал ресурсный подход к организации экономического роста - теоретические аспекты модели роста экономики. Ростовая динамика обычно сменяет рецессию, а выход экономики из рецессии требует обоснования мероприятий правительственной политики, способствующих не только преодолению кризиса, но и выводу экономики на траекторию устойчивого роста заданного темпа. Исследование касается оценки моделей агрегатного типа в рамках применяемого ресурсно-факторного подхода, а также влияния инвестиций и потребительских расходов на темп экономического роста на теоретическом (модельном) и эмпирическом уровне анализа. Современный уровень технологичности и вид «технологической функции» обеспечивают не только способность роста экономики в текущем режиме, но и долгосрочные перспективы роста. Технологический выбор предопределяет экстенсивный или интенсивный тип экономического роста. Определено, как связаны скорости создания нового и отвлечения имеющегося ресурса для обеспечения роста. Чем интенсивнее идет отвлечение ресурса от имеющихся возможностей либо заимствование, а также чем выше процентная ставка, тем ниже возможности по созданию нового ресурса и скромны возможности роста за счет освоения нового ресурса. Показано, что изменение технологического уровня для роста экономической системы требует большего изменения потребительских расходов. Относительно экономической политики стимулирования инвестиций в России показано, что на первой фазе выхода из рецессии потребуется не столько наращение величины инвестиций, сколько стимулирование совокупного потребления и восстановление уровня доходов граждан. Поэтому кризис потребления требует элиминации. А с учетом того, что компонента валового потребления занимает самую большую долю в структуре ВВП РФ, стимулирование потребления через смягчение денежно-кредитной и бюджетной политики с мерами противодействия инфляции на уровне роста затрат и экономической структуры (регулирование естественных монополий) позволит сложить первую фазу политики экономического роста в России. Экономический рост России перед кризисом 2015 г. происходил не за счет инвестиций, а за счет потребительских, правительственных расходов и чистого экспорта. Теперь нужно искать новые факторы роста за счет инвестиций, рассматривая их влияние на технологические параметры экономики. Кроме того, повышение нормы накопления не является самоцелью для организации политики экономического роста, скорее данный параметр выступает результирующим и соответственно должен восприниматься при принятии макроэкономических решений.

Suggested Citation

  • O. Sukharev S. & О. Сухарев С., 2017. "Некоторые Проблемы Теории Экономического Роста // Some Problems Of The Economic Growth Theory," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 21(3), pages 61-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:3:p:61-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/362/289.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Solow, 1994. "Perspectives on Growth Theory," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 45-54, Winter.
    2. Richard Nelson, 2008. "Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 9-21.
    3. Robert M. Solow, 2007. "The last 50 years in growth theory and the next 10," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 3-14, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oleg Sukharev, 2016. "Economic Growth of a Rapidly Developing Economy: Theoretical Formulation," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 359-370.
    2. Jeon, Heesang, 2015. "Knowledge and Contemporary Capitalism in Light of Marx's Value Theory," Thesis Commons g5njk, Center for Open Science.
    3. O. S. Sukharev, 2019. "Economic growth and technological renewal: Structural dynamics," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 30-54, May.
    4. Daniele Tavani & Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Endogenous Technical Change In Alternative Theories Of Growth And Distribution," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1272-1303, December.
    5. O. Sukharev S. & О. Сухарев С., 2018. "Финансирование Развития: Решение Структурно-Распределительной Задачи // Development Financing: The Solution Of The Structural-Distributive Problem," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(3), pages 64-83.
    6. Erich Gundlach, 2003. "Growth Effects of EU Membership: The Case of East Germany," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 237-270, September.
    7. Kieran McQuinn & Karl Whelan, 2007. "Solow ( 1956 ) as a model of cross-country growth dynamics," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 45-62, Spring.
    8. Sorin Celea & Petre Brezeanu & Ana Petrina Păun, 2013. "Fiscal Discipline within the EU: Comparative Analysis," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 23-30.
    9. Roobavannan, M. & Kandasamy, J. & Pande, S. & Vigneswaran, S. & Sivapalan, M., 2020. "Sustainability of agricultural basin development under uncertain future climate and economic conditions: A socio-hydrological analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Christian Groth & Karl-Josef Koch & Thomas Steger, 2006. "Rethinking the Concept of Long-Run Economic Growth," CESifo Working Paper Series 1701, CESifo.
    11. Wilson, E.J. & Chaudhri, D.P., 2000. "Endogeneity, Knowledge and Dynamics of Long Run Capitalist Economic Growth," Economics Working Papers wp00-03, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    12. Wignaraja, Ganeshan, 2008. "FDI and Innovation as Drivers of Export Behaviour: Firm-level Evidence from East Asia," MERIT Working Papers 2008-061, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    13. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2006. "Better Rules or Stronger Communities? On the Social Foundations of Institutional Change and Its Economic Effects," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(1), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Joe Kerkvliet & William Nebesky & Carol Tremblay & Victor Tremblay, 1998. "Efficiency and Technological Change in the U.S. Brewing Industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 271-288, November.
    15. Shelby D. Hunt, 2012. "Understanding the Drivers of Economic Growth: Grounding Endogenous Economic Growth Models in Resource-Advantage Theory," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 6(4), December.
    16. Asongu, Simplice & Boateng, Agyenim & Akamavi, Raphael, 2016. "Mobile Phone Innovation and Inclusive Human Development: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," MPRA Paper 75046, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Pozzolo, Alberto Franco, 2004. "Endogenous Growth in Open Economies - A Survey of Major Results," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp04020, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    18. Lee, Keun & Juma, Calestous & Mathews, John, 2014. "Innovation capabilities for sustainable development in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 062, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Josep Carrion-i-Silvestre & Vicente German-Soto, 2010. "Stochastic convergence in the industrial sector of the Mexican states," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(3), pages 547-570, December.
    20. Khobai Hlalefang & Hamman Nicolene & Mkhombo Thando & Mhaka Simba & Mavikela Nomahlubi & Phiri Andrew, 2018. "The FDI-Growth Nexus in South Africa: A Re-Examination Using Quantile Regression Approach," Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, Sciendo, vol. 63(3), pages 33-55, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2017:i:3:p:61-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.