IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/accntn/y2019i2p52-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Основы концепции анализа производственно-хозяйственной деятельности учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы // Conceptual Framework to Analyze the Production and Economic Activity of the Institutions of the Penal Correction System

Author

Listed:
  • Т. Sheshukova G.

    (Perm State National Research University, Perm)

  • A. Sanacheva A.

    (Perm State National Research University, Perm)

  • Т. Шешукова Г.

    (Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет, Пермь)

  • А. Саначева А.

    (Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет, Пермь)

Abstract

The subject of the research is a complex of theoretical, methodological and practical issues related to the analysis of the production and economic activity of the institutions belonging to the penal correction system (PCS). The authors largely use the following methods of cognition: observation, analysis and synthesis, grouping and aggregation of heterogeneous data; analogy; methods of comparative analysis, complex and systematic approaches; logical and graphic methods. The paper describes the key features of the analysis of the production and economic activity of the PCS institutions and the main objects of the research. In addition the research identifies the indicators applicable particularly to the analysis of penal correction institutions which makes this research different from a traditional economic analysis. Taking into account the peculiarities of PCS institutions the authors specify certain special directions of the research and propose additional indicators. As the main purposes of PCS institutions are of social character, integrative indicators should be able to measure the extent of achieving social results. The analysis of current assets includes the consideration of such groups of assets as food and general stores. The analysis of human resources should cover not only prison service civilian and certified staff but also convicts and, specifically, the relationship between their labor productivity and financial incentives. The analysis of the activity of PCS institutions should also incorporate the assessment of the effectiveness of use of state-provided funds. Предметом исследования выступает комплекс теоретических, методологических и практических вопросов, связанных с проведением анализа производственно-хозяйственной деятельности учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы (УИС). В ходе исследования широко использовались следующие методы познания: наблюдение, анализ и синтез, индукция и дедукция, методы группировки и агрегирования неоднородных данных, аналогия, методы сравнительного анализа, комплексные и системные подходы, логический и графический методы. В результате проведения исследования были выявлены ключевые особенности проведения анализа производственно-хозяйственной деятельности учреждений УИС, а также определены основные объекты, на которые должно быть направлено исследование. Кроме того, были установлены показатели, характерные именно для оценки деятельности исправительных учреждений, что отличает данное исследование от традиционного экономического анализа. Учитывая особенности деятельности учреждений УИС, некоторые направления анализа производственно-хозяйственной деятельности были конкретизированы и дополнены специфическими показателями. Поскольку основные цели учреждений УИС носят социальный характер, то на этапе выбора обобщающих показателей должно быть оценено достижение социальных результатов. Проведение анализа оборотных активов будет характеризоваться включением в оценку таких групп активов, как продукты питания и вещевое имущество. Анализ персонала должен включать не только исследование вольнонаемного и аттестованного персонала, но и осужденных, зависимость их производительности труда от системы материального стимулирования. Кроме того, в анализ деятельности учреждений УИС необходимо включить оценку эффективности расходования государственных средств.

Suggested Citation

  • Т. Sheshukova G. & A. Sanacheva A. & Т. Шешукова Г. & А. Саначева А., 2019. "Основы концепции анализа производственно-хозяйственной деятельности учреждений уголовно-исполнительной системы // Conceptual Framework to Analyze the Production and Economic Activity of the Institutio," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 6(2), pages 52-59.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2019:i:2:p:52-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://accounting.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/240/241.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beaver, William H. & Correia, Maria & McNichols, Maureen F., 2011. "Financial Statement Analysis and the Prediction of Financial Distress," Foundations and Trends(R) in Accounting, now publishers, vol. 5(2), pages 99-173, May.
    2. Li Li Eng & Xi Tian & T. Robert Yu, 2018. "Financial Statement Analysis: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-32, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffroy Enjolras & Philippe Madiès, 2020. "The role of bank analysts and scores in the prediction of financial distress: Evidence from French farms," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2978-2993.
    2. Chen, Qi & Goldstein, Itay & Huang, Zeqiong & Vashishtha, Rahul, 2022. "Bank transparency and deposit flows," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 475-501.
    3. Peng-Chia Chiu & Timothy D. Haight, 2020. "Investor learning, earnings signals, and stock returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 671-698, February.
    4. Yu Ling Tsai & Hua-Wei Huang, 2020. "Does Convergent-IFRS Adoption in China Increase Audit Fees?," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Songsheng Chen & Jun Guo & Qingqing Liu & Xiaoxiao Tong, 2021. "The impact of XBRL on real earnings management: unexpected consequences of the XBRL implementation in China," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 479-504, February.
    6. Janda, Karel & Moreira, David, 2016. "Predicting bankruptcy in European e-commerce sector," MPRA Paper 74460, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Niluthpaul Sarker & S. M. Khaled Hossain, 2023. "Ownership Structure and Financial Distress: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Audit Quality," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 187-202, November.
    8. Ashraf, Sumaira & Félix, Elisabete G.S. & Serrasqueiro, Zélia, 2020. "Development and testing of an augmented distress prediction model: A comparative study on a developed and an emerging market," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 57.
    9. María Fernanda Meneses-González & Javier Eliecer Pirateque-Niño & Santiago David Segovia-Baquero, 2019. "Indicadores de alerta temprana para el sector corporativo privado colombiano," Borradores de Economia 1084, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    10. Massimiliano Celli, 2021. "The Accounting of Consolidation Differences in the European Accounting Practice," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 102-102, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2019:i:2:p:52-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://accounting.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.