IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v30y2016i1p77-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customer-driven management models for choiceless clientele? Business process reengineering in a California welfare agency

Author

Listed:
  • Jill Esbenshade

    (San Diego State University, USA)

  • Matt Vidal

    (King’s College London, UK)

  • Gina Fascilla

    (San Diego State University, USA)

  • Mariko Ono

    (San Diego State University, USA)

Abstract

Business process reengineering and lean are increasingly used to restructure public sector work. This article presents a case study of reengineering in a California welfare agency. It finds extensive work intensification and reduced autonomy for the workforce, and deteriorating service for the clientele. Rather than attribute these outcomes as inherent to the business process reengineering model, this article emphasizes how cost cutting and quantitative efficiency were prioritized over worker empowerment and service quality because the organization is a government agency facing severe budgetary pressures under neoliberalism, and the clientele consists of indigent families and individuals who have no choice of an alternative provider.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill Esbenshade & Matt Vidal & Gina Fascilla & Mariko Ono, 2016. "Customer-driven management models for choiceless clientele? Business process reengineering in a California welfare agency," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 30(1), pages 77-96, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:30:y:2016:i:1:p:77-96
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017015604109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017015604109
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017015604109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gail Hebson & Damian Grimshaw & Mick Marchington, 2003. "PPPs and the Changing Public Sector Ethos: Case-Study Evidence from the Health and Local Authority Sectors," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 17(3), pages 481-501, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tummers, L.G. & Van de Walle, Steven, 2012. "Explaining health care professionals’ resistance to implement Diagnosis Related Groups: (No) benefits for society, patients and professionals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 158-166.
    2. Ian Roper & Philip James & Paul Higgins, 2005. "Workplace partnership and public service provision," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(3), pages 639-649, September.
    3. Julie Rayner & Alan Lawton & Helen Williams, 2012. "Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Public Service Ethos: Whither the Organization?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 117-130, March.
    4. Salvatore Russo, 2013. "The swing of public-private partnership in the Italian hospitals. A comparative analysis of two case studies," Working Papers 21, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    5. Peggy McDonough, 2006. "Habitus and the practice of public service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(4), pages 629-647, December.
    6. A. Bennett, 2011. "Learning to Be Job Ready: Strategies for Greater Social Inclusion in Public Sector Employment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 347-359, December.
    7. Stephen Bach, 2016. "Deprivileging the public sector workforce: Austerity, fragmentation and service withdrawal in Britain," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(1), pages 11-28, March.
    8. Topiwala, Priyanka, 2015. "Laboratory employee’s reflections towards change in transitioning from a public to a private laboratory service," MBA Research Papers 4961, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Management.
    9. Krachler, Nick & Greer, Ian, 2015. "When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 215-223.
    10. Georgia Black & Kostas Kononovas & Jayne Taylor & Rosalind Raine, 2014. "Healthcare Planning for the Olympics in London: A Qualitative Evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    11. Gill Kirton & Cécile Guillaume, 2019. "When Welfare Professionals Encounter Restructuring and Privatization: The Inside Story of the Probation Service of England and Wales," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(6), pages 929-947, December.
    12. Clare Butler & Anne Marie Doherty & Jocelyn Finniear & Stephen Hill, 2015. "Alone in the back office: the isolation of those who care to support public services," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(4), pages 624-640, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:30:y:2016:i:1:p:77-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.