IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0092338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare Planning for the Olympics in London: A Qualitative Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Georgia Black
  • Kostas Kononovas
  • Jayne Taylor
  • Rosalind Raine

Abstract

Background: Mass gatherings, such as the Olympic and Paralympic Games, represent an enormous logistical challenge for the host city. Health service planners must deliver routine and emergency services and, in recent Games, health legacy initiatives, for the local and visiting population. However there is little evidence to support their planning decisions. We therefore evaluated the strategic health planning programme for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games to identify generalisable information for future Games. Methods: We thematically analysed data from stakeholder interviews and documents. The data were prospectively collected in three phases, before, during and after the Games. Findings: We identified five key themes: (1) Systemic Improvement for example in communications, (2) Effective relationships led to efficiencies and permanent gains, such as new relationships with the private sector (3) Difficult relationships led to inefficiencies, for instance, duplication in testing and exercising emergency scenarios, (4) Tendency to over-estimate demand for care, particularly emergency medicine, and (5) Difficulties establishing a health legacy due to its deprioritisation and lack of vision by the programme team. Interpretation: Enduring improvements which are sustained after the Games are possible, such as the establishment of new and productive partnerships. Relationships must be established early on to avoid duplication, delay and unnecessary expense. There should be greater critical evaluation of the likely demand for health services to reduce the wasting of resources. Finally, if a health legacy is planned, then clear definitions and commitment to its measurement is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgia Black & Kostas Kononovas & Jayne Taylor & Rosalind Raine, 2014. "Healthcare Planning for the Olympics in London: A Qualitative Evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0092338
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092338
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092338&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0092338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gail Hebson & Damian Grimshaw & Mick Marchington, 2003. "PPPs and the Changing Public Sector Ethos: Case-Study Evidence from the Health and Local Authority Sectors," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 17(3), pages 481-501, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregorio González-Alcaide & Pedro Llorente & José M. Ramos, 2016. "Bibliometric indicators to identify emerging research fields: publications on mass gatherings," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 1283-1298, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tummers, L.G. & Van de Walle, Steven, 2012. "Explaining health care professionals’ resistance to implement Diagnosis Related Groups: (No) benefits for society, patients and professionals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 158-166.
    2. Ian Roper & Philip James & Paul Higgins, 2005. "Workplace partnership and public service provision," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(3), pages 639-649, September.
    3. Julie Rayner & Alan Lawton & Helen Williams, 2012. "Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Public Service Ethos: Whither the Organization?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(2), pages 117-130, March.
    4. Salvatore Russo, 2013. "The swing of public-private partnership in the Italian hospitals. A comparative analysis of two case studies," Working Papers 21, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    5. Peggy McDonough, 2006. "Habitus and the practice of public service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(4), pages 629-647, December.
    6. A. Bennett, 2011. "Learning to Be Job Ready: Strategies for Greater Social Inclusion in Public Sector Employment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 347-359, December.
    7. Stephen Bach, 2016. "Deprivileging the public sector workforce: Austerity, fragmentation and service withdrawal in Britain," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(1), pages 11-28, March.
    8. Jill Esbenshade & Matt Vidal & Gina Fascilla & Mariko Ono, 2016. "Customer-driven management models for choiceless clientele? Business process reengineering in a California welfare agency," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 30(1), pages 77-96, February.
    9. Topiwala, Priyanka, 2015. "Laboratory employee’s reflections towards change in transitioning from a public to a private laboratory service," MBA Research Papers 4961, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Management.
    10. Krachler, Nick & Greer, Ian, 2015. "When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 215-223.
    11. Gill Kirton & Cécile Guillaume, 2019. "When Welfare Professionals Encounter Restructuring and Privatization: The Inside Story of the Probation Service of England and Wales," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(6), pages 929-947, December.
    12. Clare Butler & Anne Marie Doherty & Jocelyn Finniear & Stephen Hill, 2015. "Alone in the back office: the isolation of those who care to support public services," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(4), pages 624-640, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0092338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.