IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v20y2006i2p223-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seagull management and the control of nursing work

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Cooke

    (University Of Manchester)

Abstract

This article considers data from a qualitative study of discipline and misconduct in nursing. It outlines the ways in which the study can inform our understanding of changes in the control of nursing work. Specifically it considers evidence for work intensification in nursing and contrasts this with policy pronouncements, which have proclaimed that nurses have been empowered by recent changes. The study found that empowerment often implied increased responsibility accompanied by tightened control. Some nurses described their managers as ‘seagull’ managers and the article elaborates what was meant by that term. The four key features of seagull management were: distance, distrust, destructive criticism, and a defensive culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Cooke, 2006. "Seagull management and the control of nursing work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(2), pages 223-243, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:20:y:2006:i:2:p:223-243
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017006064112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017006064112
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017006064112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damian Grimshaw, 1999. "Changes in Skills-Mix and Pay Determination among the Nursing Workforce in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(2), pages 295-328, June.
    2. Stephen Ackroyd & Sharon Bolton, 1999. "It is not Taylorism: Mechanisms of Work Intensification in the Provision of Gynaecological Services in a NHS Hospital," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 13(2), pages 369-387, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McGovern, Patrick, 2014. "Contradictions at work: a critical review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45188, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. McDonald, Ruth & Campbell, Stephen & Lester, Helen, 2009. "Practice nurses and the effects of the new general practitioner contract in the English National Health Service: The extension of a professional project?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1206-1212, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Smith & Raffaella Valsecchi & Frank Mueller & Jonathan Gabe, 2008. "Knowledge and the discourse of labour process transformation: nurses and the case of NHS Direct for England," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(4), pages 581-599, December.
    2. Hemantika Basu, 2019. "Mode of Work Organization in Nursing: Management Practices in Private Healthcare in India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 44(4), pages 433-454, November.
    3. Francis Green & Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Golo Henseke, 2022. "Working Still Harder," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(2), pages 458-487, March.
    4. Damian Grimshaw, 2000. "Public Sector Employment, Wage Inequality and the Gender Pay Ratio in the UK," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 427-448.
    5. Graeme Currie & Rachael Finn & Graham Martin, 2009. "Professional competition and modernizing the clinical workforce in the NHS," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 267-284, June.
    6. Francis Green, 2002. "Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense?," Studies in Economics 0207, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    7. Sharon C. Bolton, 2004. "A Simple Matter of Control? NHS Hospital Nurses and New Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 317-333, March.
    8. Stephanie Tailby, 2005. "Agency and bank nursing in the UK National Health Service," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(2), pages 369-389, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:20:y:2006:i:2:p:223-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.