IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vikjou/v42y2017i3p131-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theorization of New Practices in Emerging Organizational Fields

Author

Listed:
  • Sushanta Kumar Sarma

Abstract

Executive Summary Organizational actions are subject to multiple interpretations by the constituents of organizational field and are often prone to lose legitimacy in an uncertain environment. To ensure that organizational practices are given meaning in a deliberate way, actors resort to ‘theorization’. The institutional theory literature looks at theorization as a legitimacy seeking strategy. IT defines the goal of theorization as mobilizing support and justifying new courses of action. By linking legitimacy, theorization, and emerging field, this article explores the question of how do the organizations theorize a new practice in an emerging field. Emerging organizational field is distinguished from a mature organizational field across four dimensions: extent of interactions among organizations, defined structure of domination and pattern of coalition among organizations, information sufficiency within the organizational field, and existence of commonly shared purpose among organizations. Theorization would focus on two important questions for justifying a new practice: ‘base of legitimacy’ and ‘audience for seeking legitimacy’. The article argues that in an emerging field, organization would theorize new practices with variants of moral and pragmatic legitimacy as base and would target the constituents of normative and market governance structure as the intended audiences. The article presents four propositions linking each of the dimensions of the emerging organizational field. It suggests that organization would theorize new practices by focusing on exchange, procedural, structural, and consequential legitimacy. The article contributes to existing literature by linking the characteristics of the emerging field to focus and audience of theorization strategy. With the growing prevalence of hybrid organizations, organizations are commonly exposed to multiple and even contradictory institutional demands. Understanding the focus of theorization and the intended audience can help these organizations to be more persuasive in seeking legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sushanta Kumar Sarma, 2017. "Theorization of New Practices in Emerging Organizational Fields," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 42(3), pages 131-144, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:vikjou:v:42:y:2017:i:3:p:131-144
    DOI: 10.1177/0256090917719980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0256090917719980
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0256090917719980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nelson Phillips & Thomas B. Lawrence & Cynthia Hardy, 2000. "Inter‐organizational Collaboration and the Dynamics of Institutional Fields," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 1-1, January.
    2. Morduch, Jonathan, 2000. "The Microfinance Schism," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 617-629, April.
    3. N. Anand & Richard A. Peterson, 2000. "When Market Information Constitutes Fields: Sensemaking of Markets in the Commercial Music Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 270-284, June.
    4. Kent, Derin & Dacin, M. Tina, 2013. "Bankers at the gate: Microfinance and the high cost of borrowed logics," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 759-773.
    5. M S Sriram, 2010. "Commercialisation of Microfinance in India: A Discussion on the Emperor’s Apparel," Working Papers id:2539, eSocialSciences.
    6. Mair, Johanna & Marti, Ignasi, 2009. "Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 419-435, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sutter, Christopher & Bruton, Garry D. & Chen, Juanyi, 2019. "Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 197-214.
    2. Daniel Makina, 2021. "Corporate Governance and Financial Inclusion: A Preliminary Review of Literature," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 12-23, October.
    3. Zhao, Eric Yanfei & Lounsbury, Michael, 2016. "An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 643-662.
    4. Gras, David & Nason, Robert S., 2015. "Bric by bric: The role of the family household in sustaining a venture in impoverished Indian slums," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 546-563.
    5. Joshua K Ault, 2016. "An institutional perspective on the social outcome of entrepreneurship: Commercial microfinance and inclusive markets," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(8), pages 951-967, October.
    6. Chliova, Myrto & Brinckmann, Jan & Rosenbusch, Nina, 2015. "Is microcredit a blessing for the poor? A meta-analysis examining development outcomes and contextual considerations," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 467-487.
    7. Simon Joncourt & Heiko Gebauer & Javier Reynoso & Karla Cabrera & Ana Valdes & Katharina Greve, 2019. "Extending the Base-of-the-Pyramid Concept," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 241-261, October.
    8. Alex Nicholls, 2011. "Editorial: Social Enterprise -- At the Forefront of Rethinking Business?," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-5, March.
    9. Subrata Chakrabarty & A. Erin Bass, 2015. "Comparing Virtue, Consequentialist, and Deontological Ethics-Based Corporate Social Responsibility: Mitigating Microfinance Risk in Institutional Voids," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 487-512, February.
    10. Doering, Laura & Wry, Tyler, 2022. "The challenges of supporting necessity entrepreneurs: Understanding loan officer exit in microfinance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2).
    11. Leif Atle Beisland & Kwame Ohene Djan & Roy Mersland & Trond Randøy, 2021. "Measuring Social Performance in Social Enterprises: A Global Study of Microfinance Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 51-71, June.
    12. Muñoz, Pablo & Kimmitt, Jonathan, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and the rest: The missing debate," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 100-106.
    13. Guillermo Casasnovas & Jessica Jones, 2022. "Who Has a Seat at the Table in Impact Investing? Addressing Inequality by Giving Voice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 951-969, September.
    14. Biswajit Ghose & S. Joplinshisha Paliar & Liha Mena, 2018. "Does Legal Status Affect Performance of Microfinance Institutions?: Empirical Evidence from India," Vision, , vol. 22(3), pages 316-328, September.
    15. Joshua K. Ault & Andrew Spicer, 2014. "The institutional context of poverty: State fragility as a predictor of cross-national variation in commercial microfinance lending," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(12), pages 1818-1838, December.
    16. Bruton, Garry D. & Ketchen, David J. & Ireland, R. Duane, 2013. "Entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 683-689.
    17. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    18. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.
    19. Bhuiyan, Muhammad Faress & Ivlevs, Artjoms, 2019. "Micro-entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 625-645.
    20. Juha Halme, 2021. "The role of social capital in the institutionalization of regional place marketing activity," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(3), pages 249-256, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vikjou:v:42:y:2017:i:3:p:131-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.