IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i6p1224-1242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The contribution of intergroup neighbouring to community participation: Evidence from Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Wang

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

  • Fangzhu Zhang

    (University College London, UK)

  • Fulong Wu

    (University College London, UK)

Abstract

What kind of neighbouring might enhance participation in community activities? Using a 1420-sized household survey collected in Shanghai, this paper examines the relationship between different types of neighbouring and community participation. Our results show that in-group neighbouring between residents belonging to the same social group does not have a direct effect on community participation. Instead intergroup neighbouring between migrant and local neighbours can lead to more willingness to take part in community activities. Owing to the unequal power configuration between minority and majority groups living in the same locality, intergroup neighbouring can help break down existing barriers between migrant residents and local residents who are mostly in charge of organising community activities. Our findings contribute to a better conceptualisation of neighbouring and community participation, which so far has focused on the quantity of neighbouring but largely ignored the types of neighbouring.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Wang & Fangzhu Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2020. "The contribution of intergroup neighbouring to community participation: Evidence from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1224-1242, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:6:p:1224-1242
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098019830899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019830899
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098019830899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fulong Wu & John Logan, 2016. "Do rural migrants ‘float’ in urban China? Neighbouring and neighbourhood sentiment in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 2973-2990, November.
    2. John Friedmann, 2007. "Reflections on Place and Place‐making in the Cities of China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 257-279, June.
    3. Leslie Shieh & John Friedmann, 2008. "Restructuring urban governance," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 183-195, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurine Blonk & Margo Trappenburg & Femmianne Bredewold, 2022. "‘I can’t just go up to a person to ask what’s going on.’ How Dutch urbanites’ accounts of non-engagement enhance our understanding of urban care," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1185-1201, May.
    2. Zheng Wang, 2022. "LIFE AFTER RESETTLEMENT IN URBAN CHINA: State‐led Community Building as a Reterritorialization Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 424-440, May.
    3. Tianlan Fu & Sanqin Mao, 2022. "Individual Social Capital and Community Participation: An Empirical Analysis of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Si-ming Li & Sanqin Mao & Huimin Du, 2019. "Residential mobility and neighbourhood attachment in Guangzhou, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 761-780, May.
    2. Shengchen Du & Hongze Tan, 2023. "Communities in Transitions: Reflection on the Impact of the Outbreak of COVID-19 on Urban China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Qingjun Zhao & Meijing Song & Hanrui Wang, 2022. "Voting with Your Feet: The Impact of Urban Public Health Service Accessibility on the Permanent Migration Intentions of Rural Migrants in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Adding new narratives to the urban imagination: An introduction to ‘New directions of urban studies in China’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 459-472, February.
    5. Weiming Tong & Kevin Lo, 2021. "Back to the Countryside: Rural Development and the Spatial Patterns of Population Migration in Zhejiang, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Zhilin Liu & Yiming Tan & Yanwei Chai, 2020. "Neighbourhood-scale public spaces, inter-group attitudes and migrant integration in Beijing, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2491-2509, September.
    7. John Friedmann, 2008. "Globalization, the City, and Civil Society in Pacific Asia: The Social Production of Civil Spaces – Edited by Mike Douglass, K.C. Ho and Giok Ling Ooi," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1028-1030, December.
    8. Shenjing He & George CS Lin, 2015. "Producing and consuming China’s new urban space: State, market and society," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2757-2773, November.
    9. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    10. Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Development, Inequality and Urban Villages in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 885-889, December.
    11. Greif, Avner & Tabellini, Guido, 2017. "The clan and the corporation: Sustaining cooperation in China and Europe," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 1-35.
    12. John Friedmann, 2007. "Forum 2007," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 38(6), pages 987-998, November.
    13. Matt Patterson, 2012. "The Role of the Public Institution in Iconic Architectural Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3289-3305, November.
    14. Wen-I Lin & Chaolee Kuo, 2013. "Community Governance and Pastorship in Shanghai: A Case Study of Luwan District," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(6), pages 1260-1276, May.
    15. Jaap Nieuwenhuis & Xinyi Shen, 2023. "The effect of meeting opportunities on local urban residents’ prejudice against migrant children in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 847-868, April.
    16. Avner Greif & Guido Tabellini, 2010. "Cultural and Institutional Bifurcation: China and Europe Compared," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 135-140, May.
    17. Siyang Cao & Wenzhi Wu, 2020. "The Resilient Bond With Zhujiajiao: (Re)making Community in a Chinese Tourism Town," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(1), pages 119-135, March.
    18. Tianke Zhu & Xigang Zhu & Jian Jin, 2021. "Grid Governance in China under the COVID-19 Outbreak: Changing Neighborhood Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Xuan Sun & Weikai Wang & Tao Sun & Ya Ping Wang, 2018. "Understanding the Living Conditions of Chinese Urban Neighborhoods through Social Infrastructure Configurations: The Case Study of Tianjin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Sanqin Mao & Jie Chen, 2021. "Residential Mobility and Post-Move Community Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from Guangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:6:p:1224-1242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.